Mathematics and metacognition in adolescents and adults with learning disabilities

International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 82-100

  Annemie, Desoete ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assessment; Comorbidity; Mathematical learning disabilities; Metacognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955144275     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13079298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barbaresi, W.J., Katusic, S.K., Colligan, R.C., Weaver, A.L., & Jacobsen, S.J. (2005). Learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976-82, Rochester, Minn, Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5 (5), 281-289.
2. Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2005). Screening for dyscalculia within Higher Education. MSOR Connections, 5 (1), 40-43
3. Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2006a). Project update. Widening the use of DyscalculiUM: A first-line screening test for dyscalculia in higher education. MSOR Connections, 6 (1), 1-3.
4. Beacham, N., & Trott, C. (2006b). Project Report: Wider use of Dyscalculi UM: An electronic screening tool for dyscalculia in H.E. MSOR Connections, 6 (2), 12-19.
5. Borkowski, J. G., Chan, L. K. S., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). A proces-oriented model of metacognition: Links between motivation and executive functioning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 1-41). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
6. Clark, L.A., Watson, D., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology: challenges to the current system and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121-153.
7. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, Sage. Cornoldi, C., Venneri, A., Marconato, F., Molin, A., & Montinaro, C. (2003). A rapid screening measure for the identification of visuospatial learning disability in schools. Journal of learning disabilities, 36, 299-306.
8. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
9. Desoete, A. (2008). Co-morbidity in mathematical learning disabilities: Rule or exception? The Open rehabilitation Journal, 1 (1), 15-26.
10. Desoete, A. (2007a). Students with mathematical disabilities in Belgium: from definition, classification and assessment to STICORDI devices. (181-222). In T.E. Scruggs & M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol. 20. International Perspectives Amsterdam & Oxford: Elsevier Press.
11. Desoete, A. (2007b). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5 (3), 705-730.
12. Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Cognitieve Deelhandelingen van het Rekenen Jongvolwassenen. CDR 5de graad. VCLB Service cvba
13. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435-449.
14. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2004). Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities in Belgium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (1), 50-61.
15. Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Huylebroeck, A. (2006). Metacognitive skills in Belgian third grade children (age 8 to 9) with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (2), 119-135.
16. De Vos, T. (1992). Tempo Test Rekenen (TTR). Nijmegen: Berkhout. Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic. Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Padova, Italy 26-30 August 2003.
19. Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. London, Sage. Frank, A.W. (2004). After methods, the story: from incongruity to truth in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14 (3), 430-440.
20. Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 564-574
21. Geary, D.C. (2004). Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (1), 4-13.
22. Holliday, A. (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. London: Sage.
23. Jordan, N., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with co-morbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.
24. Kaplan, B., Crawford, S., Cantell, M., Kooistra, L., & Dewey, D. (2006). Comorbidity, cooccurrence, continuum: what's in a name? Child: care, health and development, 32, 723-731.
25. Kibby, M. Y., Marks, W., Morgan, S., & Long, C. J. (2004). Specific impairment in developmental reading disabilities: A working memory approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 349-363.
26. Light, J.G., & DeFries, J.C. (1995). Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disabilities: Genetic and environmental etiologies. Journal of learning disabilities, 28, 96-106.
27. Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391.
28. Martinez, R. (2006). Social support in inclusive middle schools: perceptions of youth with learning disabilities, Psychology in the Schools, 43 (2), 197-209.
29. Martinez, R. & Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2004). Emotional Adjustment and School Functioning of Young Adolescents with Multiple Versus Single LearningDisabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37 (5), 411-420.
30. Neale, M.C., & Kendler, K.S. (1995). Models of Comorbidity for Multifactorial Disorders, American Journal of Human Genetics, 57 (4), 935-953.
31. Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385-413.
32. Pressley, M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between study analyses of thinking-aloud data. In G. Schraw, & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 262-296). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
33. Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students' work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 236-245.
34. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (Eds.) (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
35. Rhee, S. H., Hewitt, J. K., Corley, R. P., Willcutt, E. G., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Testing Hypotheses Regarding the Causes of Comorbidity: Examining the Underlying Deficits of Comorbid Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 346-362.
36. Seale, C., Gogo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
37. Shalev, R.S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 121-125.
38. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). A Triarchic View of Giftedness: Theory and Practice. In N. Coleangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 43-53). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Focussing on mathematical disabilities: a search for definition, classification and assessment. In Soren V. Randall (Ed.), Learning Disabilities New Research. Nova Science: Hauppage, NY.
41. Swanson, H.L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2009). Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 175-196.
42. Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274
43. Swanson, H.L., Jerman, O., & Zheng, X. (2008). Math Disabilities and Reading Disabilities: Can they be Separated? Journal of Psycho-educational assessment, in press.
44. Swanson, H. L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2001). Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 294-321.
45. Tesch, R. (1991). Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer
46. Trott, C. & Beacham, N. (2006). Dyscalcul IUM. UK: Mathematics Education Centre, Lough borough University.
47. Van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427-449
48. Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning. Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3-14.
49. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learnedfrom multi-method designs? In C. Artelt, & B. Moschner (Eds), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 77-99). Münster: Waxmann.
50. Willcutt, E.G., Pennington, B.F., Boada, R., Ogline, J.S., Tunick, R.A., Chhabildas, N.A. et al. (2001). A comparison of the cognitive deficits in reading disability an attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 157-172.