Rail transportation by hydrogen vs. electrification - Case study for Ontario, Canada, II: Energy supply and distribution

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6097-6107

  Marin, G D ^a   Naterer, G F ^a   Gabriel, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Copper chlorine cycle; Electrolysis; Hydrogen train; Thermochemical hydrogen production

Indexed keywords

COPPER-CHLORINE CYCLE; ECONOMIC ASPECTS; ENERGY SUPPLIES; ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; GHG EMISSION; HYDROGEN-FUELLED; LOAD FACTORS; ONTARIO , CANADA; PERSONAL VEHICLES; RAIL TRANSPORTATION; THERMOCHEMICAL HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; TORONTO; TRAIN OPERATIONS; TRAIN SERVICES; TRANSPORTATION MODE;

CHLORINE; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROLYSIS; ENGINES; FUEL CELLS; GAS PRODUCERS; HYDROGEN FUELS; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; LOCOMOTIVES; MASS TRANSPORTATION; RAILROAD CARS; RAILROADS; REACTION KINETICS;

ELECTRIC RAILROADS;

EID: 77955135278     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.095     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. R. McIsaac The big move, transforming transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area 2008 Office of the Chair Metrolinx Toronto [Press release]
2. The cost of congestion, Move-Ontario 2020 Newsroom June 15 2007 [Online] Office of the Premier, June 15, 2007. [Cited: 01 01, 2010.] http://www.news. ontario.ca/opo/en/2007/06/moveontario-2020.html
3. McDonald, and Hatch Mott GO Transit Lakeshore corridor 2031, addendum to April 08, 2008 final report 2008 GO Transit Toronto PR251423.002
4. Y. Haseli, G.F. Naterer, and I. Dincer Comparative assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation of hydrogen passenger trains Oshawa: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 1788 1796 2008.02.005
5. Locomotive Emissions Monitoring Program, Environment Canada [Online, [Cited: 01 02, 2010.] http://www.railcan.ca/documents/publications/1118/2006-04- 12-LemReport2004-en.pdf December 2005 EPS 2/TS/19
6. GO transit Lakeshore ExpressRrail benefits case. GO Transit Lakeshore [Online, cited: 11 21, 2010.] https://ozone.scholarsportal.info/bitstream/1873/ 15137/1/294744.pdf June 2009
7. M.E. Nelson, E.L. Keating, D.R. Govan, R.J. Banchack, and J.R. Corpus Hydrogen production from nuclear fission product waste heat and use in gas turbines Annapolis, MD: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 5 1979 383 399 0360-3199/80/0701
8. Michele A. Lewis, and Joseph G. Masin The evaluation of alternative thermochemical cycles, part II, the down-selection process Argonne, IL: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 4125 4135 2008.07.085
9. Hydrogen Innnovation and Research Centre Denmark Hydrogentrain.eu. The European hydrogen train, feasibility study, main report July 2006 [Online cited: November 13, 2009.] www.hydrogentrain.eu
10. K. Ogawa, T. Yamamoto, and H. Hasegawa Development of the fuel-cell/battery hybrid railway vehicle Dearbon, MI IEEEXplore digital library 2009 978-1-4244-2600-3 1730-1735
11. AEA Technology Rail Rail Safety Standards Board, T 531 feasibility study into the use of hydrogen fuel - final report 2005 [Online, cited: November 12, 2009.] www.rssb.co.uk LD82120
12. 2 emissions related to energy use. CANMET. s.l.: Energy Diversification Research Laboratory.
13. P.L. Spath, and M.K. Mann Life cycle assesment of hydrogen production via natural gas steam reforming 2001 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado
14. J. Marcinkoski, J.P. Kopasz, and T.G. Benjamin Progress in DOE fuel cell subprogram efforts in polymer electrolyte fuel cells s.l.: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 3894 3902
15. E. Anderson, and P. Lukaszewicz Energy consumption and related air pollution for Scandinavian electric passenger trains 2006 Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Stokholm, Sweeden KTH/AVE 2006-20
16. M. Balat Potential importance of hydrogen as future solution to transportation and environmental problems s.l. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 4013 4029
17. National Research Council, Committee on Alternatives and Strategies for Future Hydrogen Production The hydrogen economy, opportunities, constrains, barriers and R&D needs s.l. 2004 National Academies Press 978 0309 0916 33
18. L.C. Brown, G.E. Besenbruch, R.D. Lentsch, K.R. Schultz, J.F. Funk, and P.S. Pickard High efficiency generation of hydrogen fuel using nuclear power. s.l.: Nucelar Energy Initiative Program 2003 DOI de-fg03-99sf21888
19. M. Ball, and M. Wietschel The future of hydrogen opportunities and challenges s.l. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 615 627
20. International Nuclear Societies Council. Nuclear production of hydrogen, technologies and perspectives for global deployment. s.l. : INSC. ISBN: 0-89448-570-9.
21. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Cost of storing and transporting hydrogen. s.l.: NREL. NREL/TP-570-25106; 1998.
22. Alistair I. Miller Hydrail: an adaptable, low cost alternative to electrification, hydrogen and fuel cells report Vancouver: s.n., 2007 Report 4.205.4
23. G. Naterer, S. Suppiah, M. Lewis, K. Gabriel, I. Dincer, and M.A. Rosen Recent Canadian advances in nuclear based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu-Cl cycle s.l. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 2901 2917
24. Roadmap on manufacturing R&D for the hydrogen economy Washington, D.C.: workshop on manufacturing R&D for the hydrogen economy 2005
25. AEA Technology Rail. 2007. RS&SB Research Programme, T 618, Improving the Efficiency of Traction Energy Use, Summary Report [Online cited: November 12, 2009.], www.rssb.co.uk.
26. L.E. Jones, and G.W. Hayward Fuel cell alternatives for locomotive propulsion s.l. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 10 1985 505 516
27. Jan Carr, CEO OPA OPA. Supply mix advice and recommendations [Online cited: December 27, 2009.] http://www.powerauthority.on.ca/Report-Static/157.htm December 9, 2005