Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography

Radiology

Volumn 256, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 387-396

  Dave, Maneesh ^a   Elmunzer, B Joseph ^b   Dwamena, Ben A ^b   Higgins, Peter D R ^b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLESTASIS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EMBASE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING; FEMALE; MALE; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77955133885     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091953     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Angulo P, Pearce DH, Johnson CD, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with biliary disease: its role in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2000;33(4):520-527.
2. Lindor KD. Characteristics of primary sclerosing cholangitis in the USA. Hepatol Res 2007;37(suppl 3):S474-S477.
3. Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1995;332(14):924-933.
4. Farrell RJ, Noonan N, Mahmud N, Morrin MM, Kelleher D, Keeling PW. Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain. Endoscopy 2001;33(8):668-675.
5. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48(1):1-10.
6. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335(13):909-918.
7. Talwalkar JA, Angulo P, Johnson CD, Petersen BT, Lindor KD. Cost-minimization analysis of MRC versus ERCP for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2004;40(1):39-45.
8. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a metaanalysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003;139(7):547-557.
9. Barker FG 2nd, Carter BS. Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19(4):E5.
10. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002;2 :9.
11. Moher D, Cook D, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354(9193):1896-1900.
12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting - Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. JAMA 2000;283(15):2008- 2012.
13. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(12):889-897.
14. van der Weijden T, IJzermans CJ, Dinant GJ, van Duijn NP, de Vet R, Buntinx F. Identifying relevant diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: the diagnostic value of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and dipstick as an example. Fam Pract 1997;14(3):204-208.
15. Weber C, Krupski G, Lorenzen J, et al. MRCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis [in German]. Rofo 2003;175(2):203-210.
16. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3 :25.
17. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 2002;21(4):589-624. (Pubitemid 34141379)
18. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(10):982-990.
19. Chu H, Cole SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59(12):1331-1332; author reply 1332-1333.
20. Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 2001;20(19):2865-2884.
21. Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 2007;8(2):239-251. (Pubitemid 46569586)
22. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988;240(4857):1285-1293.
23. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56(11):1129-1135.
24. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL; The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test: B - what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994;271(9):703-707.
25. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-560.
26. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(9):882-893. (Pubitemid 41115772)
27. Dwamena B. MIDAS: Meta-analytical integration of diagnostic accuracy studies in Stata, North American Stata Users' Group meetings, 2007. University of Michigan, MIDAS Web site. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/metadiagnosis/midas- home. Published August 15, 2007. Accessed October 5, 2009.
28. Moff SL, Kamel IR, Eustace J, et al. Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64(2):219-223. (Pubitemid 44062484)
29. Weber C, Kuhlencordt R, Grotelueschen R, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy 2008;40(9):739-745.
30. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: interobserver variability and comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(2):399-407. (Pubitemid 34785643)
31. Vitellas KM, Enns RA, Keogan MT, et al. Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(2):327-334.
32. Oberholzer K, Lohse AW, Mildenberger P, et al. Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: prospective comparison of MR cholangiography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [in German]. Rofo 1998;169(6):622-626.
33. Ernst O, Asselah T, Sergent G, et al. MR cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(4):1027-1030.
34. Leclerc JC, Cannard L, Lefèvre F, et al. Imaging of the intrahepatic biliary tree with thick slice MR cholangiography [in French]. J Radiol 2001;82(2):151-160.
35. Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith HJ, Aasen S, Boberg KM, Schrumpf E. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4(4):514-520.
36. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJ, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography - a case-control study. Radiology 2000;215(1):71-80.
37. Ferrara C, Valeri G, Salvolini L, Giovagnoni A. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32(6):413-417. (Pubitemid 36075729)
38. Textor HJ, Flacke S, Pauleit D, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2002;34(12):984-990.
39. Meagher S, Yusoff I, Kennedy W, Martel M, Adam V, Barkun A. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a \cost-effectiveness analysis. Endoscopy 2007;39(3):222-228. (Pubitemid 46510793)
40. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48(1):119-130;discussion 131-132.
41. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323(7305):157-162. (Pubitemid 32678396)