Acer negundo invasion along a successional gradient: Early direct facilitation by native pioneers and late indirect facilitation by conspecifics

New Phytologist

Volumn 187, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 831-842

  Saccone, Patrick ^a,b   Pagès, Jean Philippe ^a   Girel, Jacky ^b   Brun, Jean Jacques ^a   Michalet, Richard ^c  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Acer negundo; Competition; Facilitation; Forest succession; Indirect facilitation; Invasion; Riparian forests

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; CONSPECIFIC; DECIDUOUS TREE; FACILITATION; FLOODPLAIN; HERB; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; JUVENILE; LIGHT EFFECT; MOISTURE CONTENT; NATIVE SPECIES; NITROGEN; RIPARIAN FOREST; SEEDLING; SUCCESSION; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION; UNDERSTORY;

FRANCE; RHONE RIVER;

ACER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIGHT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RADIATION RESPONSE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL; TREE;

ACER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEM; LIGHT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREES;

EID: 77955129771     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03289.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI. Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 2004, 85:2682-2686.
2. Badano EI, Villarroel E, Bustamantes RO, Marquet PA, Cavieres LA. Ecosystem engineering facilitates invasions by exotic plants in high-Andean ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 2007, 95:682-688.
3. Berlow EL. Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 1999, 398:330-334.
4. Bertness MD, Callaway R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1994, 9:191-195.
5. Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1996, 11:290-295.
6. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2003, 18:119-125.
7. Bulleri F, Bruno JF, Benedetti-Cecchi L. Beyond competition: incorporating positive interactions between species to predict ecosystem invasibility. PLoS Biology 2008, 6:1136-1140.
8. Callaway R, Aschehoug ET. Invasive plant versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 2000, 290:521-523.
9. Ceccherelli G, Cinelli F. The role of vegetative fragmentation in dispersal of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia in the mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1999, 182:299-303.
10. Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at glacier bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 1994, 64:149-175.
11. Clements FE. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation 1916, Washington, DC, USA, Carnegie Institute of Washington
12. Closset-Kopp D, Chabrerie O, Valentin B, Delachappelle H, Decocq G. When Oskar meets Alice: does a lack of trade-off in r/k-strategies make Prunus serotina a successful invader of European forests? Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 247:120-130.
13. Connell JH. Apparent vs. 'real' competition in plants. Perspectives on plant competition 1990, 9-26. Grace JBTilman D. eds, New York, NY, USA, Academic Press
14. Dorich RA, Nelson DW. Ammonium measurement. Soil Science Society of American Journal 1983, 47:833-836.
15. Elton CS. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants 1958, London, UK, Methuen
16. Forey E, Touzard B, Michalet R. Does disturbance drive the collapse of biotic interactions at the severe end of a diversity-biomass gradient? Plant Ecology 2010, 206:287-295.
17. Galbraith-Kent SL, Handel SN. Invasive Acer platanoides inhibits native sapling growth in forest understorey communities. Journal of Ecology 2008, 96:293-302.
18. Gomez-Aparicio L, Canham CD, Martin PH. Neighbourhood models of the effects of the invasive Acer platanoides on tree seedling dynamics: linking impacts on communities and ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 2008, 96:78-90.
19. Grime JP. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature 1974, 250:26-31.
20. Grime JP. Plant strategies and vegetation processes 1979, Chichester, UK, Wiley and Sons
21. Hager HA. Competitive effect versus competitive response of invasive and native wetland plant species. Oecologia 2004, 139:140-149.
22. Isobe T, Feigelson ED, Akritas MG, Babu GJ. Linear regression in astronomy I. The Astrophysical Journal 1990, 364:104-113.
23. Karrenberg S, Blaser S, Kollmann J, Speck T, Edwards PJ. Root anchorage of saplings and cuttings of woody pioneer species in a riparian environment. Functional Ecology 2003, 17:170-177.
24. Lambrinos JG, Bando KJ. Habitat modification inhibits conspecific seedling recruitment in populations of an invasive ecosystem engineer. Biological Invasions 2008, 10:729-741.
25. Levine JM. Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology 1999, 80:1762-1769.
26. Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to toxic plant invasions. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:975-989.
27. Liancourt P, Callaway R, Michalet R. Stress tolerance and competitive-response ability determine the outcome of biotic interactions. Ecology 2005, 86:1611-1618.
28. Michalet R, Brooker R, Cavieres LA, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Pugnaire FI, Vialente-Banuet A, Callaway R. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters 2006, 9:767-773.
29. Mitchell CE, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Gilbert GS, Hufbauer RA, Klironomos JN, Maron JL, Morris WF, Parker IM, Power AG. Biotic interactions and plant invasions. Ecology Letters 2006, 9:726-740.
30. Niinemets U, Valladares F. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs 2006, 76:521-547.
31. Pagès JP, Michalet R. A test of the indirect facilitation model in temperate hardwood forest of the Northern French Alps. Journal of Ecology 2003, 91:932-940.
32. Pagès JP, Michalet R. Contrasted responses of two understorey species to direct and indirect effects of a canopy gap. Plant Ecology 2006, 187:179-187.
33. Pagès JP, Pache G, Joud D, Magnan N, Michalet R. Direct and indirect effects of shade on four forest tree seedlings in the French Alps. Ecology 2003, 84:2741-2750.
34. Pautou G, Girel J, Borel JL. Initial repercussions and hydroelectric developments in the French upper Rhone valley: a lesson for predictive scenarios propositions. Environmental Management 1992, 16:231-242.
35. Pont B. Iles de la platière- plan de gestion 1999-2003 1999, Sablons, France, Association des amis de la reserve naturelle
36. Rameau JC, Mansion D, Dumé G. Flore forestière française 1. Plaines et collines 1997, Paris, France, Institut pour le Développement Forestier
37. Reinhart KO, Greene E, Callaway RM. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in northern rocky mountains. Ecography 2005, 28:573-582.
38. Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsh SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, Pysek P, Hobbs RJ. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Diversity and Distributions 2007, 13:126-139.
39. Ruesink JL. Biotic resistance and facilitation of non-native oyster on rocky shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2007, 331:1-9.
40. Saccone P, Pages JP, Brun JJ, Michalet R. The role of biotic interactions in altering tree seedling response to an extreme climatic event. Journal of Vegetation Science 2009, 20:403-414.
41. Siemann E, Rogers WE. Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer tress may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands. Journal of Ecology 2003, 91:923-931.
42. Simberloff D. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecology Letters 2006, 9:912-919.
43. Simberloff D, Von Holle B. Positive interactions of nonindigeneous species: invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1999, 1:21-32.
44. Suding KN, Lejeune KD, Seastedt TR. Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Oecologia 2004, 141:526-535.
45. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stage of invasion. New Phytologist 2007, 176:256-273.
46. Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance 1997, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
47. Von Holle B. Biotic resistance to invader establishment of a southern Appalachian plant community is determined by environmental conditions. Journal of Ecology 2005, 93:16-26.
48. Wheatley RE, McDonald R, McSmith A. Extraction of nitrogen from soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1989, 8:189-190.
49. White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR. Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Diversity and Distributions 2006, 12:443-455.
50. Whited DC, Lorang MS, Harner MJ, Hauer FR, Kimball JS, Standford JA. Climate, hydrologic disturbance, and succession: drivers of floodplain pattern. Ecology 2007, 88:940-953.