Toward a taxonomy of written errors: Investigation into the written errors of Hong Kong cantonese ESL learners

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 295-319

  Chan, Alice Y W ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955129354     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5054/tq.2010.219941     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bell, N. (1992). The role of spoken error correction in second language acquisition: Issues in corrective technique. ORTESOL Journal, 13, 21-32.
2. Bell, R. T. (1974). Error analysis: A recent pseudoprocedure in applied linguistics. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 25/26, 35-49.
3. Bolton, K. (2002). The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English. In K. Bolton (Ed.), Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity (pp. 29-56). Hong Kong SAR, China: Hong Kong University Press.
4. Bolton, K., & Lim, S. (2002). Futures for Hong Kong English. In K. Bolton (Ed.), Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity (pp. 295-313). Hong Kong SAR, China: Hong Kong University Press.
5. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Budge, C. (1989). Plural marking in Hong Kong English. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 12, 39-47.
7. Carroll, S., Swain, M., & Roberge, Y. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005555.
8. Chan, A. Y. W. (2003). Alerting students to the correct use of until using an algorithmic approach. The ORTESOL Journal, 22, 69-78.
9. Chan, A. Y. W. (2004a). Although... but; because... so: Why can't they be used together? Modern English Teacher, 13, 24-25.
10. Chan, A. Y. W. (2004b). Noun phrases in Chinese and English: A Study of English structural problems encountered by Chinese ESL students in Hong Kong. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17, 33-47. doi:10.1080/07908310408666680.
11. Chan, A. Y. W. (2004c). Syntactic transfer: Evidence from the interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 56-74. doi:10.1111/ j.0026-7902.2004.00218.x.
12. Chan, A. Y. W. (2004d). The boy who Mary loves him is called John: A study of the resumptive pronoun problem and its correction strategies. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 53-69.
13. Chan, A. Y.W. (2006). An algorithmic approach to error correction: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 131-147. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02254.x.
14. Chan, A. Y. W., Kwan, B. S. C., & Li, D. C. S. (2002). An algorithmic approach to error correction: Correcting three common errors at different levels. JALT Journal, 24, 201-216.
15. Chan, A. Y. W., Kwan, B. S. C., & Li, D. C. S. (2003). Tackling the ''independent clause as subject'' problem. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 13, 107-117.
16. Chan, A. Y. W., & Li, D. C. S. (2002). Form-focused remedial instruction: An empirical study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 24-53. doi:10.1111/ 1473-4192.00023.
17. Chan, A. Y. W., Li, D. C. S., & Kwan, B. S. C. (2003). Misplacement and misuse of very: Helping students overcome the very + VERB problem. The English Teacher: An International Journal, 6, 125-132.
18. Chan, B. (1991). A study of errors made by F6 students in their written English with special reference to structures involving the transitive verb and the passive construction. ILE Journal, 2, 43-51.
19. Cook, V. J. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. London, England: Macmillan Press.
20. Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5, 161-170. doi:10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161.
21. Deterding, D. (2000). Potential influences of Chinese on the written English of Singapore. In A. Brown (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia 99 (pp. 201-209). Singapore: National Institute of Education.
22. Gisborne, N. (2002). Relative clauses in Hong Kong English. In K. Bolton (Ed.), Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity (pp. 141-160). Hong Kong SAR, China: Hong Kong University Press.
23. Green, C. (1991). Typological transfer, discourse accent and the Chinese writer of English. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 14, 51-63.
24. Hall, C. J. (2002). The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 69-87.
25. Hammarberg, B. (1974). On the insufficiency of error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 12, 185-192. doi:10.1515/iral.1974.12.1-4.185.
26. Hung, T. T. N. (2002). Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. In K. Bolton (Ed.), Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity (pp. 119-140). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
27. James, C. (1990). Learner language. Language Teaching, 23, 205-213. doi:10.1017/ S0261444800005905.
28. James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London, England: Longman.
29. Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-100.
30. Kellerman, E. (1995). Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 125-150. doi:10.1017/S0267190500002658.
31. Kellerman, E., & Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.). (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Institute of English.
32. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London, England: Longman.
33. Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35. Li, D. C. S. (1999). The functions and status of English in Hong Kong: A post-1997 update. English World-Wide, 20, 67-110.
36. Li, D. C. S. (2000). Hong Kong English: New variety of English or interlanguage? English Australia Journal, 18, 50-59.
37. Li, D. C. S., & Chan, A. Y. W. (1999). Helping teachers correct structural and lexical English errors. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 79-102.
38. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448. doi:10.1017/S0272263100009517.
39. Matthews, S., & Yip, V. (1994). Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London, England: Routledge.
40. Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Poedjosodarmo, G. (2000). Influence of Malay on the written English of university students in Singapore. In A. Brown (Ed.), English in Southeast Asia 99 (pp. 210-219). Singapore: National Institute of Education.
42. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, England: Longman.
43. Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (2nd ed.). Essex, England: Longman.
44. Santos, T. (1988). Processors' reactions to the academic writing of nonnativespeaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 69-90. doi:10.2307/3587062.
45. Snow, D. (2004). Cantonese as written language: The growth of a written Chinese vernacular. Hong Kong SAR, China: Hong Kong University Press.
46. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
47. Tan, C. (2005). English or Singlish? The syntactic influences of Chinese and Malay on the learning of English in Singapore. Journal of Language and Learning, 3, 156-179.
48. Tang, S. W., Fan, G., Lee, H. T., Lun, S., Tung, C. S., & Cheung, K. H. (2002). jyut6 jyu5 ping3 jam1 zi6 biu2 (Guide to LSHK Cantonese romanization of Chinese characters) (2nd ed.). Hong Kong SAR, China: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
49. Vann, R., Meyer, D., & Lorenz, F. (1984). Error gravity: A study of faculty opinion of ESL errors. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 427-440. doi:10.2307/3586713.
50. Webster, M., & Lam, W. C. P. (1991). Further notes on the influence of Cantonese on the English of Hong Kong students. ILE Journal, 2, 35-42.
51. Webster, M., Ward, A., & Craig, K. (1987). Language errors due to first language interference (Cantonese) produced by Hong Kong students of English. ILE Journal, 3, 63-81.
52. Yip, V. (1995). Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
53. Yip, V. & Matthews, S. (1991). Relative complexity: Beyond avoidance. CUHK Papers in Linguistics, 3, 112-124.
54. Yu, V. W. S. (1988a). An investigation of the language difficulties experienced by Hong Kong secondary school students in English-medium schools. I. The problems. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 267-284.
55. Yu, V. W. S. (1988b). An investigation of the language difficulties experienced by Hong Kong secondary school students in English-medium schools. II. Some causal factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 307-322.
56. Zhu, S. (2007, May-June). Syntactic influences of Chinese on written Singapore English. Paper presented at The Second CELC Symposium for English Language Teachers, Singapore.