Dynamic panels with endogenous interaction effects when T is small

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 272-282

  Elhorst, J Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dynamic panels; Fixed effects; Interaction effects; Monte Carlo experiments

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PANEL DATA;

CITRUS MAXIMA; LUMPY SKIN DISEASE VIRUS;

EID: 77955126156     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
2. Anselin L., Hudak S. Spatial econometrics in practice: a review of software options. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1992, 22:509-536.
3. Arrelano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 1991, 58:277-297.
4. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2005, Wiley, Chichester. 3rd edition.
5. Baltagi B.H., Song S.H., Jung B.C., Koh W. Testing for serial correlation, spatial autocorrelation and random effects using panel data. Journal of Econometrics 2006, 140:5-51.
6. Barry R.P., Pace R.K. Monte Carlo estimates of the log determinant of large sparse matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications 1999, 289:41-54.
7. Bhargava A., Sargan J.D. Estimating dynamic random effects models from panel data covering short time periods. Econometrica 1983, 51:1635-1659.
8. Brock W.A., Durlauf S.N. Interactions-based models. Handbook of Econometrics 2001, Vol. 5:3297-3380. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
9. Brueckner J.K. Strategic interaction among local governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review 2003, 26:175-188.
10. Elhorst J.P. Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geographical Analysis 2005, 37:62-83.
11. Elhorst J.P. Serial and spatial autocorrelation. Economics Letters 2008, 100:422-424.
12. Elhorst J.P. Spatial panel data models. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis 2010, 377-407. Springer, Berlin. M.M. Fischer, A. Getis (Eds.).
13. Griffith D.A. Advanced Spatial Statistics 1988, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
14. Hsiao C., Pesaran M.H., Tahmiscioglu A.K. Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 109:107-150.
15. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 17:99-121.
16. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R., Yuzefovich Y. Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances: large and small sample results. Spatial and Spatiotemporal Econometrics 2004, 163-198. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.P. LeSage, K. Pace (Eds.).
17. Korniotis G.M. Estimating panel models with internal and external habit formation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2010, 28:145-158.
18. Lee L.-F. Best spatial two-stage least squares estimators for a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Econometric Reviews 2003, 22:307-335.
19. Leenders R.T.A.J. Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 2002, 24:21-47.
20. LeSage J.P. Spatial Econometrics http://www.spatial-econometrics.com/html/sbook.pdf.
21. LeSage J.P., Pace R.K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics 2009, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
22. Manski C.F. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 1993, 60:531-542.
23. Nerlove M. Properties of alternative estimators of dynamic panel models: an empirical analysis of cross-country data for the study of economic growth. Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models 1999, 136-170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Hsiao, K. Lahiri, L.-F. Lee, M.H. Pesaran (Eds.).
24. Nickell S. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 1981, 49:1417-1426.
25. Pace R.K., Barry R. Quick computation of spatial autoregressive estimators. Geographical Analysis 1997, 29:232-246.
26. Revelli F. Spatial patterns in local taxation: tax mimicking or error mimicking?. Applied Economics 2001, 33:1101-1107.
27. Soetevent A.R. Empirics of the identification of social interactions: an evolution of the approaches and their results. Journal of Economic Surveys 2006, 20:193-228.
28. Su L., Yang Z. QML Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Models with Spatial Errors http://fp.paceprojects.f9.co.uk/Su.pdf.
29. Yu J., de Jong R., Lee L. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. Journal of Econometrics 2008, 146:118-134.