Embracing change: Perceptions of e-journals by faculty members

Learned Publishing

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 209-223

  McClanahan, Kitty ^a   Wu, Lei ^a   Tenopir, Carol ^a   King, Donald W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955120992     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20100304     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Stewart, L. 1996. User acceptace of electronic journals: interviews with chemists at Cornell University. College & Research Libraries, 57: 339-349.
2. Stoller, M.B. 1992. Electronic journals in the humanities: a survey and critique. Library Trends, 40: 647-666.
3. Hart, J.L., Coleman, V. and Yu, H. 1999. Marketing electronic resources and services: surveying faculty use as a first step. Reference Librarian, 67/68: 41-55.
4. Adams, J.A. and Bonk, S.C. 1995. Electronic information technologies and resources: use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library services. College & Research Libraries, 56: 119-131.
5. Speier, C., Palmer, J., Wren, D. and Hahn, S. 1999. Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: a question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 537-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50: 6<537::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-6
6. Budd, J.M. and Connaway, L.S. 1997. University faculty and networked information: results of a survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 843-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199709)48:9<843::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-R
7. Tenner, E. and Yang, Z.Y. 1999. End-user acceptance of electronic journals: a case study from a major academic research library. Technical Services Quarterly, 17: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J124v17n02_01
8. Salisbury, L. and Noguera, E. 2003. Usability of e-journals and preference for the Virtual Periodicals Room: a survey of mathematics faculty and graduate students. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 4.
9. King, D.W., Tenopir, C., Montgomery, C.H. and Aerni, S.E. 2003. Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine, 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/october2003-king
10. King, D.W., Tenopir, C., Choemprayong, S., and Wu, Lei. 2009. Scholarly journal information-seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five U.S. universities. Learned Publishing, 22: 126-144.
11. Tenopir, C., Return On Investment in Academic Research Libraries: Phase 2-The Role of Libraries in the Grants Process. Proceedings of the 2009 Online Information Meeting, December 2009. Forthcoming.]
12. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 1998.
13. Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers. Washington, DC, Special Libraries Association, 2000.
14. Conger, J.E. 2007. Usage statistics in context: develop effective assessment practices through collaboration. Serials Librarian, 53: 261-273.