Activity-centric support for weakly-structured business processes

EICS'10 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 251-260

  Schmidt, Benedikt ^a   Stoitsev, Todor ^a   Mühlhäuser, Max ^b  

^a SAP RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; Knowledge work support; Task execution support

Indexed keywords

BLIND SPOTS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE WORK; PERSONALIZATIONS; TASK EXECUTION SUPPORT; TASK EXECUTIONS; USER INTERACTION;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77955114713     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1822018.1822057     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Becks, C. Seeling, and S. Birlinghoven. A Task-Model for Text Corpus Analysis in Knowledge Management. Machine Learning, (July), 2001.
2. K. Byström and P. Hansen. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10):1050-1061, 2005.
3. P. Cohen and H. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial intelligence, 42(2-3):213-261, 1990.
4. D. Diaper. Understanding task analysis for human-computer interaction, chapter 1, pages 5-47. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, London, 2004.
5. T. V. Eijndhoven, M.-E. Iacob, and M. L. Ponisio. Achieving Business Process Flexibility with Business Rules. 2008 12th International IEEE Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pages 95-104, 2008.
6. M. J. Eppler, P. M. Seifried, and A. Röpnack. Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. Proceedings of the 199 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research - SIGCPR '99, pages 222-230, 1999.
7. A. Forward and T. C. Lethbridge. A Taxonomy of Software Types to Facilitate Search and Evidence-Based Software Engineering. ACM, pages 1-13, 2008.
8. N. Gronau, R. Korf, and C. Müller. KMDL-Capturing, Analysing and Improving Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes. Journal of Computer Science, 4(4):452-472, 2005.
9. T. Hädrich. Situation-oriented Provision of Knowledge Services. Information Systems, 2008.
10. D. Hu and Q. Yang. CIGAR: Concurrent and interleaving goal and activity recognition. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), volume pages, pages 1363-1368, 2008.
11. H. Kautz. A formal theory of plan recognition and its implementation. Reasoning about plans, 125:1-67, 1991.
12. B. Levin. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. The University Press of Chicago, Chicago, 1993.
13. Y. Li and N. Belkin. A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 44(6):1822-1837, 2008.
14. R. Lokaiczyk and M. Goertz. Extending Low Level Context Events by Data Aggregation. Proceedings of I-KNOW 08 and I-MEDIA '08, pages 118-125, 2008.
15. T. Malone, K. Crowston, and G. Herman. Organizing Business Knowledge. MIT Press Cambridge.
16. J. Mendling and J. Recker. Towards systematic usage of labels and icons in business process models. In Proc. of EMMSAD, pages 1-13, 2008.
17. T. Moran. Unified activity management: explicitly representing activity in work-support systems. In Workshop on Activity: From a Theoretical to a Computational Construct, volume 1, pages 1-10. Citeseer, 2005.
18. D. Mwanza. Where theory meets practice: A case for an Activity Theory based methodology to guide computer system design. In Proceedings of INTERACT, pages 9-13, 2001.
19. P. Pyöriä. The concept of knowledge work revisited. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3):116-127, 2005.
20. A. S. Rath. UICO: An ontology-based user interaction context model for Automatic Task Detection on the Computer Desktop. CIAO '09: Proc. 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies, pages 1-10, 2009.
21. R. B. Reich. The work of nations - Preparing Ourselves for 21st Centurv Capitalism. Vintage Books, 1992.
22. U. Riss, B. Schmidt, and T. Stoitsev. Task Patterns in Collaborative Semantic Task Management as Means of Corporate Experience Preservation. In Workshop on Knowledge and Experience Management, pages 40-47, 2009.
23. L. Sauermann, L. Van Elst, and A. Dengel. Pimo-a framework for representing personal information models. Proceedings of I-Semantics, 7:270-277, 2007.
24. S. Schwarz. A context model for personal knowledge management. LNCS, 3946:18-33, 2006.
25. K. Sousa, H. Mendonca, and J. Vanderdonckt. Addressing the impact of business process changes on software user interfaces. 2008 3rd IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Business-driven IT Management, pages 11-20, April 2008.
26. W. van der Aalst, A. Hofstede, and M. Weske. Business process management: A survey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1-12, 2003.
27. B. Weber, M. Reichert, and S. Rinderle-Ma. Change patterns and change support featuresenhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 66(3):438-466, 2008.