IT security governance and centralized security controls

Enterprise Information Systems Assurance and System Security: Managerial and Technical Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 16-24

  Warkentin, Merrill ^a   Johnston, Allen C ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955101093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-911-3.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Hodgkinson, S. (1996). The role of the corporate IT function in the Federal IT organization. In M. Earl, Information management: The organizational dimension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. IEEE Std. 1471.2000. Recommended practice for architectural description. New York: IEEE.
3. ITGI® - IT Governance Institute. (2003). Board briefing on IT governance. Retrieved September 6, 2004, from www.ITgovernance.org/resources.htm
4. Johnston, A. C., Schmidt, M.B., & Bekkering, E. (2004, April). IT security management practices: Successes and failures in coping with Blaster and Sobig.F. Proceedings of the 2004 ISOneWorld International Conference, Las Vegas, NV (pp. 1-12).
5. Kroenke, D., & Hatch, R. (1994). Management information systems. Watsonville, CA: McGraw-Hill.
6. Mishra, S., & Dhillon, G. (2006). The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act on information security governance. In M. Warkentin & R. Vaughn (Eds.), Enterprise information security assurance and system security: Managerial and technical issues (pp. 62-79). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
7. Robson, W. (1997). Strategic management and information systems: An integrated approach. London: Pitman Publishing.
8. Whitman, M. E. (2003). Enemy at the gate: Threats to information security. Communications of the ACM, 46(8), 91-95.