The economic tradition and the constitution of science

Public Choice

Volumn 144, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 401-411

  Albert, Hans ^a  

^a Freiburgerstr 62   (Germany)

Author keywords

Competition in science; Critical rationalism; Institutionalism; Methodology of economics; Philosophy of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955095528     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9675-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akerlof, G. A. (1984). An economist's book of tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Albert, H. (1978). Traktat über rationale Praxis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
3. Albert, H. (1979). The economic tradition: economics as a research programme for theoretical social science. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics and social institutions. Insights from the conferences on analysis and ideology (pp. 1-27). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
4. Albert, H. (1987). Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre. Das Erkenntnisproblem in realistischer Perspektive. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
5. Albert, H. (1998). Marktsoziologie und Entscheidungslogik. Zur Kritik der reinen Ökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
6. Albert, H. (2000). Kritischer Rationalismus. Vier Kapitel zur Kritik illusionären Denkens. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
7. Albert, M. (2001). Bayesian learning and expectations formation: anything goes. In D. Corfield & J. Williamson (Eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism (pp. 341-362). Kluwer: Dordrecht.
8. Albert, M. (2002). Der kritische Rationalismus und die Verfassung der Wissenschaft. In J. M. Böhme, H. Holweg, & C. Hoock (Eds.), Karl Poppers kritischer Rationalismus heute (pp. 231-241). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
9. Albert, M. (2003). Bayesian rationality and decision making. A critical review. Analyse & Kritik, 25, 101-117.
10. Albert, M. (2004). Methodologie und die Verfassung der Wissenschaft: Eine institutionalistische Perspektive. In M. Held, G. Kubon-Gilke, & R. Sturn (Eds.), Ökonomik des Wissens. Jahrbuch Normative und Institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik (Band 3). Marburg: Metropolis.
11. Böhm, F. (1960). Die Bedeutung der Wirtschaftsordnung für die politische Verfassung. In E. J. Mestmäcker (Ed.), Franz Böhm. Reden und Schriften (pp. 46-68). Karlsruhe: Müller.
12. Böhm, J. M. (2006). Kritische Rationalität und Verstehen. Beiträge zu einer rationalistischen Hermeneutik. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
13. Brunner, K. (Ed.) (1979). Economics and social institutions. Insights from the conferences on analysis and ideology. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
14. Eucken, W. (1947). Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie (5 Auflage). Bad Godesberg: Küpper.
15. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Gadenne, V. (1996). Rationale Heuristik und Falsifikation. In V. Gadenne & H. J. Wendel (Eds.), Rationalität und Kritik (pp. 57-88). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
17. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1950). The theory of choice and the constancy of economic laws. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 125-138.
18. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1954). Choice, expectations and measurability. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 503-534.
19. Hicks, J. R. (1939). In Value and capital. An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory (2nd edn. 1946). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Hübner, K., Lobkowicz, N., Lübbe, H., & Radnitzky, G. (Eds.) (1976). Die politische Herausforderung der Wissenschaft. Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe.
21. Jarvie, I. (2001). The republic of science. The emergence of Popper's social view of science 1935-1945. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
22. Kirchgässner, G. (1999). Wirtschaftspolitische Beratung aus der Sicht des kritischen Rationalismus: vierzehn Thesen. In I. Pies & M. Leschke (Eds.), Karl Poppers kritischer Rationalismus (pp. 193-225). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
23. Kirchgässner, G. (2008). Homo oeconomicus. The economic model of behavior and its applications in economics and other social sciences. New York: Springer.
24. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Kelley. 1964.
25. Mantzavinos, C. (2001). Individuals, institutions, and markets (pp. 83-130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Meyer, W. (2002). Grundlagen des ökonomischen Denkens. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
27. Popper, K. (1950). The open society and its enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Popper, K. (1956). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge.
29. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
30. Popper, K. (1963a). Truth, rationality and the growth of scientific knowledge. In K. Popper (Ed.), Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.
31. Popper, K. (1963b). Towards a rational theory of tradition. In K. Popper (Ed.), Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.
32. Popper, K. (1979). Evolution and the tree of knowledge. In K. Popper (Ed.), Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach (pp. 256-284, Rev. edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Scherhorn, G. (1969). Der Wettbewerb in der Erfahrungswissenschaft. Ein Beitrag zur allgemeinen Theorie des Marktes. Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts-und Gesellschaftspolitik, 14, 63-86.
34. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). In Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (5 Auflage 1952). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
35. Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics. A critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and the causes of the wealth of nations (The Works of Adam Smith in Five Volumes, Vol. IV). Aalen: Scientia, 1963.
37. Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199-1235.
38. Vanberg, V. (2001). The constitution of markets. Essays in political economy. London/New York: Routledge.
39. Vanberg, V. (2002). Rational choice vs. program-based behavior. Alternative theoretical approaches, behavioral paradigms and their relevance for the study of institutions. Rationality and Society, 14, 7-54.
40. Vanberg, V. (2004). The rationality postulate in economics, its ambiguity, its deficiency and its evolutionary alternative. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11, 1-29.
41. Vining, R. (1956). Economics in the United States of America. Paris: UNESCO.
42. Vollmer, G. (1975). Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Hirzel.
43. Vollmer, G. (1985). Was können wir wissen? Band 1: Die Natur der Erkenntnis. Beiträge zur evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Hirzel.