Differences in causal reasoning about resource dynamics and consequences for the participatory debate on North Sea fisheries

Marine Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1144-1155

  Verweij, M C ^a   van Densen, W L T ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Complexity; Fish stock dynamics; Mapping; Perceptions; Renewable natural resource; Time lags

Indexed keywords

FISHERY ECONOMICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY POLICY; MAPPING; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; NORTH SEA;

PLEURONECTES;

EID: 77955089798     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Moxnes E. Overexploitation of renewable resources: the role of misperceptions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1998, 37:107-127.
2. Crabbé A., Leroy P. The handbook of environmental policy evaluation 2008, Earthscan Ltd., Trowbridge.
3. van Densen, WLT. On the perception of time trends in resource outcome. Its importance in fisheries co-management, agriculture and whaling. PhD thesis. Enschede: Twente University; 2001. http://purl.org/utwente/68175.
4. Verweij M.C., van Densen W.L.T., Mol A.J.P. The tower of Babel: different perceptions and controversies on change and status of North Sea fish stocks in multi-stakeholder settings. Marine Policy 2010, 34:522-533.
5. van Densen W.L.T., McCay B.J. Improving communication from managers to fishers in Europe and the US. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2007, 64:811-817.
6. Smith M.E. The nature of nature: conflict and consensus in fisheries management. Aquatic Living Resources 1995, 8:209-213.
7. Jensen E. Learning and transfer from a simple dynamic system. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2005, 46:119-131.
8. Moxnes E. Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of bioeconomics. Management Science 1998, 44:1234-1248.
9. van Beek FA. On the effects of mesh enlargement in the North Sea sole fishery. ICES C.M. 1982/B:39.
10. van Beek F.A., van Leeuwen P.I., Rijnsdorp A.D. On the survival of plaice and sole discards in the otter-trawl and beam-trawl fisheries in the North-Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 1990, 26:151-160.
11. ICES. Plaice in subarea IV. ICES Advisory Committee Book 6; 2009.
12. European Commission. On the implementation of the policy to reduce unwanted by-catch and eliminate discards in European fisheries. Non-paper from the Commission of the European Communities. Brussels 2008.
13. European Commission. Green paper: reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. Brussels: COM 2009 163 final.
14. Quirijns F.J., Hintzen N. Effect van de maaswijdte op de vangstsamenstelling in de boomkorvisserij 2007, Wageningen IMARES, IJmuiden, C122/07.
15. Catchpole T., van Keeken O., Gray T., Piet G. The discard problem-a comparative analysis of two fisheries: the English Nephrops fishery and the Dutch beam trawl fishery. Ocean & Coastal Management 2008, 51:772-778.
16. van Densen W., Smit J., van Oostenbrugge H., Machiels M. Effecten van een verhoging van de minimummaat (MLS) voor tong 2008, Wageningen IMARES, IJmuiden, C045/08.
17. Pastoors M.A., Rijnsdorp A.D., van Beek F.A. Effects of a partially closed area in the North Sea ("plaice box") on stock development of plaice. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2000, 57:1014-1022.
18. Grift RE, Tulp I, Clarke L, Damm U, McLay A, Reeves S, Vigneau J, Weber W. Assessment of the ecological effects of the Plaice Box. Brussels: Report of the European Commission Expert Working Group to evaluate the Shetland and Plaice boxes; 2004.
19. Hugenholtz E. The Dutch case: a network of marine protected areas 2008, WWF Netherlands, Zeist.
20. Beare D, Rijnsdorp A, van Kooten T, Fock H, Schroeder A, Kloppman M, Witbaard R, Meesters E, Schulze T, Blaesbjerg M, Damm U, Quirijns F. Study for the revision of the plaice box. IJmuiden: Wageningen IMARES; 2010. C002/10.
21. Hiddink J.G., Rijnsdorp A.D., Piet G. Can bottom trawling disturbance increase food production for a commercial fish species?. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2008, 65:1393-1401.
22. Paolisso M. Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: a cultural model for understanding watermen's reasoning about blue crab management. Human Organization 2002, 61:226-239.
23. Berkes F., Berkes M.K. Ecological complexity, fuzzy logic, and holism in indigenous knowledge. Futures 2009, 41:6-12.
24. Prigent M., Fontenelle G., Rochet M.J., Trenkel V.M. Using cognitive maps to investigate fishers' ecosystem objectives and knowledge. Ocean & Coastal Management 2008, 51:450-462.
25. Christensen A.S. Fewer fish than frustrations: an analysis of multiplicity in knowledge articulation. MAST/Maritime Studies 2009, 8:53-73.
26. Wilson D.C., Raakjaer J., Degnbol P. Local ecological knowledge and practical fisheries management in the tropics: a policy brief. Marine Policy 2006, 30:794-801.
27. Berkes F. Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. Traditional ecological knowledge: concepts and cases 1993, International program on traditional ecological knowledge and international development research center, Ottawa. J.T. Inglis (Ed.).
28. Pálsson G. Learning by fishing: practical engagement and environmental concerns. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. F. Berkes, C. Folke (Eds.).
29. van Hoof L. Co-management: an alternative to enforcement? ICES Journal of Marine Science 2010;67:395-401.
30. Holmes J., Lock J. Generating the evidence for marine fisheries policy and management. Marine Policy 2010, 34:29-35.