The role of fluctuating resource supply in a habitat maintained by the competition-colonization trade-off

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1195, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Chakraborty, Amit ^a   Li, Bai Lian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

coexistence; competition colonization trade offs; fluctuating resource supply; invasibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETITION; EXOTIC SPECIES; HABITAT; NONHUMAN; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 77955075695     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05399.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alpert, P., E. Bone & C. Holzapfel. 2000. Invasiveness, invisibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3: 52-66.
2. Arii, K. & L. Parrott. 2006. Examining the colonization process of exotic species varying in competitive abilities using a cellular automaton model. Ecol. Model. 199: 219-228.
3. Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 343-366.
4. Colautti, R.I., I.A. Grigorvich &H.J.Maclsaac. 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Inv. 8: 1023-1037.
5. Crawley, M.J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? In Colonization, Succession, and Stability. M.J. Crawley, P.J. Edwards&A.J.Gray, Eds.: 429-454. Blackwell Scientific. Oxford, UK.
6. D'Antonio, C.M. & J.M. Levine. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15-26.
7. Davis, M.A. 2005. Invasibility: the local mechanism driving community assembly and species diversity. Ecography 28: 696-704.
8. Davis, M.A., J.P. Grime & K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88: 528-534.
9. Goodwin, B.J., A.J. McAllister & L. Fahrig. 1999. Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Cons. Biol. 13: 422-426.
10. Grover, J.P. 1990. Resource competition in a variable environment: phytoplankton growing according toMonod's model. Am. Nat. 136: 771-789.
11. Grover J.P. 1997.ResourceCompetition. Springer. TheNetherlands. Hastings, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space. Theor. Pop. Biol. 18: 363-373.
12. Hobbs, R.J. & S.E. Humphries. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions.Cons. Biol. 9: 761-770.
13. Houston, M.A. & D.L. DeAngelis. 1994. Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am. Nat. 144: 954-977.
14. Hsu, S.B. 1980. A competition model for a seasonally fluctuating nutrient. J. Math. Biol. 9: 115-132.
15. Huston, M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
16. Huston, M.A. 2004. Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers. Distrib. 10: 167-178.
17. Kinzig, A.P., S.A. Levin, J.Dushoff&S. Pacala. 1999. Limiting similarity, species packing, and system stability for hierarchical competition-colonization models. Am. Naturalist 153: 371-383.
18. Kolar, C.S.&D.M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
19. Landau,H.C.M. 2003. Seeds of understanding of plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1469-1471.
20. Lloret, F., F.Medail, G. Brundu, et al. 2005. Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. J. Ecol. 93: 512-520.
21. Lockwood, J.L., P. Cassey & T. Blackburn. 2005. The role of propagules pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
22. Lonsdale,W.M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522-1536.
23. Radford, I.J. & R.D. Cousens. 2000. Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia. Oecologia 125: 531-542.
24. Rejmanek, M. & D.M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1660.
25. Rejmanek,M.,D.M. Richardson & P. Pysek. 2005. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In Vegetation Ecology. E. van derMaarel, Ed.: 332-355. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford, UK.
26. Roxburgh, S.H., K. Shea & J.B. Wilson. 2004. Intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85: 359-371.
27. Schoolmaster, D.R., R.E. Snyder 2007. Invasibility in a spatiotemporally fluctuating environment is determined by the periodicity of fluctuations and resident turnover rates. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 1429-1435.
28. Seabloom, E.W.,W.S. Harpole & D. Tilman. 2003a. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 13384-13389.
29. Seabloom, E.W., E.T. Borer, V.L. Boucher, et al. 2003b. Competition, seed limitation, disturbance, and reestablishment of California native annual forbs. Ecol. Appl. 13: 575-592.
30. Shea, K. & P. Chesson. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170-176.
31. Snyder, R.E. & P. Chesson. 2004. How the scales of dispersal, competition, and environmental heterogeneity interact of affect coexistence. Am. Naturalist 164: 633-650.
32. Tilman,D. 1982.ResourceCompetition andCommunity Structure. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
33. Tilman D.1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2-16.
34. Yu,D.W.&H.B.Wilson. 2001. The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition-colonization trade-off. Am. Naturalist 158: 49-63.