The correlation in antepartum fetal test between full fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and rapid biophysical profile (rBPP)

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 93, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 759-764

  Phattanachindakun, Buraya ^a   Boonyagulsrirung, Tanong ^a   Chanprapaph, Pharuhas ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Amniotic fluid index; Fetal surveillance; Full biophysical profile; Rapid biophysical profile; Sound provoked fetal movement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE; FETAL WELL BEING; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS HEART RATE; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS MOVEMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OLIGOHYDRAMNIOS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; FEMALE; FETAL DISTRESS; FETAL MONITORING; FETAL MOVEMENT; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955069783     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 771-7.
2. Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. I. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 343-50.
3. Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 709-12.
4. Baskett TF, Allen AC, Gray JH, Young DC, Young LM. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 357-60.
5. Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Ingardia CJ, Nochimson DJ. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 271-8.
6. Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 1672-6.
7. Tongprasert F, Jinpala S, Srisupandit K, Tongsong T. The rapid biophysical profile for early intrapartum fetal well-being assessment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 95: 14-7.
8. Tongsong T, Piyamongkol W, Anantachote A, Pulphutapong K. The rapid biophysical profile for assessment of fetal well-being. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1999; 25: 431-6.
9. Clark SL, Sabey P, Jolley K. Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 694-7.
10. Bartnicki J, Dudenhausen JW. Antepartum vibroacoustic stimulation in patients with low fetal heart rate variability. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995; 48: 173-7.
11. Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 131-4.
12. Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacobs N. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 353-6.
13. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 787-95.
14. Voxman EG, Tran S, Wing DA. Low amniotic fluid index as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. J Perinatol 2002; 22: 282-5.
15. Caridi BJ, Bolnick JM, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF. Effect of halogen light stimulation on nonstress testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1470-2.
16. Druzin ML, Gratacos J, Paul RH, Broussard P, McCart D, Smith M. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. XII. The effect of manual manipulation of the fetus on the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 61-4.