Relationship between declared funding support and level of evidence

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1647-1651

  Noordin, Shahryar ^a   Wright, James G ^b   Howard, Andrew ^b  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNDING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLICATION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; ORTHOPEDICS; UNITED STATES;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INDUSTRY; ORTHOPEDICS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955068187     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00224     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lubahn JD, Mankin CJ, Mankin HJ, Kuhn PJ. Orthopaedics, ethics, and industry. Appropriateness of gifts, grants, and awards. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:256-63.
2. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A. Reporting financial conflicts of interest and relationships between investigators and research sponsors. JAMA. 2001;286:89-91.
3. Okike K, Kocher MS, Wei EX, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M. Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1466-74.
4. Moses H 3rd, Martin JB. Academic relationships with industry: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA. 2001;285:933-5.
5. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454-65.
6. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167-70.
7. Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system. JAMA. 2008;300:1069-71.
8. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1-3.
9. Vandenbroucke JP. In defense of case reports and case series. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:330-4.
10. Swiontkowski MF. Publication of clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1-2.
11. Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1010-8.
12. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M. Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:595-601.
13. Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Heckman JD, Bhandari M. Nonscientific factors associated with acceptance for publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2432-7.
14. Jayadev A, Stiglitz J. Two ideas to increase innovation and reduce pharmaceutical costs and prices. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:w165-8.
15. Noordin S, Wright JG, Howard AW. Global relevance of literature on trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2422-7.
16. Clifford TJ, Barrowman NJ, Moher D. Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:18.
17. Khan MH, Lee JY, Rihn JA, Cassinelli EH, Lim MR, Kang JD, Donaldson WF 3rd. The surgeon as a consultant for medical device manufacturers: what do our patients think? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:2616-9.