Short-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: Considerations for management strategies and reproducibility of diagnosis

Anticancer Research

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2319-2323

  Guedes, Ana Claudia ^a   Zeferino, Luis Carlos ^b   Syrjänen, Kari Juhani ^c   Brenna, Sylvia Michelina Fernandes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Female genital tract disease; Precancerous conditions; Reproducibility; Spontaneous neoplasm regression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSURGERY; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENOTYPE; HAZARD RATIO; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM REGRESSION, SPONTANEOUS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77955060524     PISSN: 02507005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Östör AG: Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12: 186-192, 1993.
2. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB and Wilkinson EJ: American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189: 295-304, 2003.
3. Syrjänen KJ: Morphological diagnosis. In: Emerging Issues of HPV Infections: From Science to Practice. Monsonego J (ed.). Basel: Karger, pp. 157-164, 2006.
4. Carreon JD, Sherman ME, Guillen D, Solomon D, Herrero R, Jeronimo J, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, Morales J, Hutchinson M, Burk RD and Schiffman M: CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26: 441-446, 2007.
5. Nasiell K, Nasiell M and Vaclavinkova V: Behavior of moderate cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 61: 609-614, 1983. (Pubitemid 13127029)
6. De Brux J, Orth G, Croissant O, Cochard B and Ionesco M: Condylomatous lesions of the uterine cervix: their course in 2466 patients. Bull Cancer 70: 410-422, 1983.
7. Bibbo M, Dytch HE, Alenghat E, Bartels PH and Wied GL: DNA ploidy profiles as prognostic indicators in CIN lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 92: 261-265, 1989. (Pubitemid 19228922)
8. Weaver MG, Abdul-Karim FW, Dale G, Sorensen K and Huang YT: Outcome in mild and moderate cervical dysplasias related to the presence of specific human papillomavirus types. Mod Pathol 3: 679-683, 1990.
9. Kataja V, Syrjänen S, Mäntyjärvi R, Yliskoski M, Saarikoski S and Syrjänen K: Prognostic factors in cervical human papillomavirus infections. Sex Transm Dis 19: 154-160, 1992.
10. Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T and To T: Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Nat Cancer Inst 91: 252-258, 1999. (Pubitemid 29090994)
11. Kruse AJ, Baak JP, Janssen EA, Bol MG, Kjellevold KH, Fianne B, Lovslett K and Bergh J: Low- and high-risk CIN 1 and 2 lesions: prospective predictive value of grade, HPV, and Ki-67 immuno-quantitative variables. J Pathol 99: 462-470, 2003.
12. Yokoyama M, Iwasaka T, Nagata C, Nozawa S, sekiya S, Hirai Y, Kanazawa K, Sata S, Hoshiai H, Sugase M, Kawana T and Yoshikawa H: Prognostic factors associated with the clinical outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cohort study in Japan. Cancer Lett 192: 171-179, 2003.
13. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM and Solomn D: Evidence for frequent regression of vercical intraepithelial neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet Gynecol 113: 18-25, 2009.
14. Stoler MH and Schiffman M: Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations. Realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA 285: 1500-1505, 2001.
15. Jeronimo J and Schiffman M: Colposcopy at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195: 349-353, 2006.
16. Schiffman M, Wheeler CM and Castle PE: ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study Group. Human papillomavirus DNA remains detectable longer than related cervical cytologic abnormalities. J Infect Dis 186: 1169-1172, 2002.
17. Castle PE, Stoler MH, Solomon D and Schiffman M: ALTS group. The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnosis. An ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol 127: 805-815, 2007.
18. Adamopoulou M, Kalkani E, Charvalos E, Avgoustidis D, Haidopoulos D and Yapijakis C: Comparison of cytology, colposcopy, HPV typing and biomarker analysis in cervical neoplasia. Anticancer Res 29: 3401-3409, 2009.
19. Vetrano G, Aleandri V, Ciolli P, Scardamaglia P, Pacchiarotti A, Verrico M, Carboni S and Corosu R: Conservative approach to preneoplasic cervical lesionsin postmenopause. Anticancer Res 28: 3941-3944, 2008.