The ivory lighthouse: Communicating climate change more effectively

Climatic Change

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 655-662

  Anderegg, William R L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; LITERATURE REVIEW; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 77955055982     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9929-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderegg WRL, Harold J (2009) Climate science and the dynamics of expert consensus. Publication of the Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University. http://www. stanford. edu/group/CCB/articles/Anderegg_ClimateConsensus_Report2009. pdf.
2. Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SHS (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. In: Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 1003187107. Accessed 21 June 2010.
3. Anonymous (2009) Climatologists under pressure. Nature 462: 545.
4. Antilla L (2005) Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Glob Environ Change 15: 338-352.
5. Boykoff MT (2007) Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39: 470-481.
6. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change 14: 125-136.
7. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions (2009) The psychology of climate change communication: a guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public. New York.
8. Doran PT, Zimmerman MK (2009) Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Eos Trans. AGU 90.
9. Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 50: 26-35.
10. Gelbspan R (1998) The heat is on: the climate crisis, the cover-up, the prescription. Basic Books, New York.
11. Gleick P et al (2010) Climate change and the integrity of science. Science 7: 689-690.
12. Jacques P, Dunlap R, Freeman M (2008) The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Env Polit 17: 349-385.
13. McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on US climate change policy. Soc Probl 50: 348-373.
14. Oreskes N (2004) Beyond the ivory tower: the scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306: 1686.
15. Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Mechants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury, London.
16. Pew Research Center for People & the Press, Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. (Pew Research Center, 2009; http://people-press. org/report/528/).
17. Schneider SH (2009) Science as a contact sport. National Geographic Society, Washington.
18. Webster B, Riddell W (2009) Global warming is not our fault, say most voters in Times poll. The Times Online. http://www. timesonline. co. uk/tol/news/environment/article6916648. ece.
19. Yohe G et al (2010) An open letter from Scientists in the United States on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Errors Contained in the Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. http://www. openletterfromscientists. com/.