Feed delivery method affects the learning of feeding and competitive behavior in dairy heifers

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3730-3737

  Greter, A M ^a   Leslie, K E ^b   Mason, G J ^a   McBride, B W ^a   DeVries, T J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competitive behavior; Dairy heifer; Delivery method; Feed behavior

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; DAIRYING; FECES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; BOVINAE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DAIRYING; FECES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEEDING METHODS; FEMALE;

ANIMALIA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77955040833     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2978     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams C.D., Dickinson A. Instrumental responding following reinforce devaluation. Q. J. Exper. Psychol. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1981, 33:109-122.
2. Official Methods of Analysis 2000, I. AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Arlington, VA. 17th ed.
3. Arnold G.W., Maller R.A. Effects of nutritional experience in early and adult life on the performance and dietary habits of sheep. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1977, 3:5-26.
4. Burritt E.A., Provenza F.D. Food aversion learning in sheep: Persistence of conditioned taste aversions to palatable shrubs (Cercocarpus montanus and Amelanchier alnifolia. J. Anim. Sci. 1990, 68:1003-1007.
5. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals 1993, Vol. 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, CCAC, Ottawa, Canada.
6. DeVries T.J., Dohme F., Beauchemin K.A. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Feed sorting. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:3958-3967.
7. DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Feeding method affects the feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:1161-1168.
8. DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Competition for feed affects the feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:3922-3929.
9. DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:1432-1438.
10. Endres M.I., DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. Effect of feed barrier design on the behavior of loose-housed lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:2377-2380.
11. González L.A., Ferret A., Manteca X., Ruíz-de-la-Torre J.L., Calsamiglia S., Devant M., Bach A. Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:1446-1458.
12. Greter A.M, Leslie K.E., Mason G.J., McBride B.W., DeVries T.J. Effect of feeding method on the behavior and growth of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:1668-1676.
13. Herlin A.H., Frank B. Effects of protective gates at concentrate feed stations on behaviour and production in dairy cows: A brief note. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 103:167-173.
14. Holm J., Bjorck I., Drews A., Asp N.G. A rapid method for the analysis of starch. Starch/Die Starke 1986, 38:224-226.
15. Ireland-Perry R.L., Stallings C.C. Fecal consistency as related to dietary composition in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76:1074-1082.
16. Kleen J.L., Hooijer G.A., Rehage J., Noordhuizen J.P. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. J. Vet. Med. A 2003, 50:406-414.
17. Kononoff P.J., Heinrichs A.J., Buckmaster D.R. Modification of Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:1858-1863.
18. Krause K.M., Oetzel G.R. Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 126:215-236.
19. Kyriazakis I., Tolkamp B.J., Emmans G. Diet selection and animal state: An integrative framework. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999, 58:765-772.
20. Leonardi C., Armentano L.E. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:557-564.
21. Longenbach J.I., Heinrichs A.J., Graves R.E. Feed bunk length requirements for Holstein dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:99-109.
22. Maekawa M., Beauchemin K.A., Christensen D.A. Effect of concentrate level and feeding management on chewing activities, saliva production, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:1165-1175.
23. Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle 2001, NRC, Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
24. Nocek J.E. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:1005-1028.
25. Nolte D.L., Provenza F.D., Balph D.F. The establishment and persistence of food preferences in lambs exposed to selected foods. J. Anim. Sci. 1990, 68:998-1002.
26. O'Grady L., Doherty M.L., Mulligan F.J. Subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) in grazing Irish dairy cows. Vet. J. 2008, 176:44-49.
27. Provenza F.D. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J. Range Manage. 1995, 48:2-17.
28. Provenza F.D., Balph D.F. Diet learning by domestic ruminants-Theory, evidence and practical implications. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987, 18:211-232.
29. Ralphs M.H., Graham D., James L.F. Social facilitation influences cattle to graze locoweed. J. Range Manage. 1994, 47:123-126.
30. User's Guide: Statistics 2003, SAS Institute, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, Version 9.1.3 ed.
31. Theios J. The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement. J. Exp. Psychol. 1962, 64:1-6.
32. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3583-3597.
33. Wojnicki F.H.E., Stine J.G., Corwin R.L.W. Liquid sucrose bingeing in rats depends on the access schedule, concentration and delivery system. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92:566-574.