Magneto-optical characterization of colloidal dispersions. Application to nickel nanoparticles

Langmuir

Volumn 26, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 12548-12552

  Pascu, Oana ^a   Caicedo, José Manuel ^a   Fontcuberta, Josep ^a   Herranz, Gervasi ^a   Roig, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHELATION; DICHROISM; DISPERSIONS; INTEGRATION TESTING; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NANOPARTICLES; NICKEL; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; COLLOIDAL DISPERSION; CONCENTRATION RANGES; CONCENTRATION VALUES; MAGNETIC CIRCULAR DICHROISMS; MAGNETIC NANO-PARTICLES; NICKEL NANOPARTICLES; SOLUTION PHASE SYNTHESIS;

NANOMAGNETICS;

COLLOID; METAL NANOPARTICLE; NICKEL;

CHEMISTRY; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; COLLOID; MAGNETISM; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

CIRCULAR DICHROISM; COLLOIDS; MAGNETICS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NICKEL;

EID: 77955020752     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: 15205827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la1011617     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Parak, W. J., Gerion, D., Pellegrino, T., Zanchet, D., Micheel, C., Williams, S. C., Boudreau, R., Le Gros, M. A., Larabell, C. A., and Alivisatos, A. P. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, R15
2. Ge, J. P., He, L., Goebl, J., and Yin, Y. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3484
3. Ge, J. P., Hu, Y. X., and Yin, Y. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7428
4. Xu, X. L., Friedman, G., Humfeld, K. D., Majetich, S. A., and Asher, S. A. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1249
5. Liu, H. T., Owen, J. S., and Alivisatos, A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 305
6. Sun, S., Zeng, H., Robinson, D. B., Raoux, S., Rice, P. M., Wang, S. X., and Li, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 273
7. Sun, S., Anders, S., Thomson, T., Baglin, J. E. E., Toney, M. F., Hamann, H. F., Murray, C. B., and Terris, B. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5419
8. Park, J., Jin, J., Gu, S., Kwon, S. G., Jang, Y., and Hyeon, T. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4630
9. Stephens, P. J. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1974, 25, 201
10. Caldwell, D., Thorne, J. M., and Eyring, H. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1971, 22, 259
11. 3 s. The main reason for this extremely different time responses is that in magnetooptics the information on the magnetic state comes from the interaction of light with matter, whereas in a SQUID extracting the magnetic information requires the sample to be moved between a couple of detector coils, which is a much slower process. On the other hand, SQUIDs use superconductive coils, and our MCD system is based on an electromagnet, in which the fields can be cycled much more rapidly.
12. Chen, Y., Peng, D. L., Lin, D., and Luo, X. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 505703
13. Murray, C. B., Sun, S., Doyle, H., and Betley, T. MRS Bull. 2001, 985
14. Hrabovsky, D., Caicedo, J. M., Herranz, G., Infante, I. C., Sánchez, F., and Fontcuberta, J. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 052401
15. Winnishofer, H., Rocha, T. C. R., Nunes, W. C., Sokolovsky, L. M., Knobel, M., and Zanchet, D. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 1313
16. Johnston-Peck, A. C., Wang, J., and Tracy, J. B. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1077
17. Chen, D.-X., Pascu, O, Roig, A., and Sanchez, A., submitted
18. Amekura, H., Takeda, Y., and Kishimoto, N. Thin Solid Films 2004, 464-465, 268-272
19. Visnovsky, S., Parizek, V, Nyvlt, M., Kielar, P, Prosser, V., and Krishnan, R. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1993, 127, 135-139
20. Crespo, P., Litrán, R., Rojas, T. C., Multigner, M., De la Fuente, J. M., Sánchez-López, J. C., García, M. A., Hernando, A., Penadés, S., and Fernández, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 087204