Group size effects in electronic brainstorming

Encyclopedia of E-Collaboration

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 330-336

  Dennis, Alan R ^a   Williams, Michael L ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955018098     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-000-4.ch051     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 3(3), 159-182.
2. Collins, B. E., & Guetzkow, H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York: Wiley.
3. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
4. Dennis, A. R., & Reinicke, B. A. (2004). Beta versus VHS and the acceptance of electronic brainstorming technology. MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 1-20.
5. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531-537.
6. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
7. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
8. Diener, S. C. (1979). Deindividuation, self-awareness, end disinhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1160-1171.
9. Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W. H., Grise, M. L., & Bastianutti, L. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 77-86.
10. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychology Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539.
11. Hunter, J. E. & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
13. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring identical proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
14. Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
15. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 823-832.
16. Levine, D., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
17. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23.
18. Nijstad, B. A., Diehle, M., & Strobe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea-generating groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137-159). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
19. Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 41-61.
20. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 249-265.
21. Pinsonneault, A., & Barki, H. (1999). The illusion of electronic brainstorming productivity: Theoretical and empirical issues. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 378-382.
22. Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R. B., & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 110-133.
23. Robinson-Staveley, K., & Cooper, J. (1990). Mere presence, gender, and reactions to computers: Studying human computer interaction in the social-context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 168-183.
24. Saks, M. J., & Ostrom, T. M. (1973). Anonymity in letters to the editor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 417-422.
25. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774-786.
26. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157-187.
27. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Straus, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information dispersion on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 57(3), 448-467.
29. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(3), 448-467.
30. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of coworker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
31. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
32. Ziegler, R., Diehl, M., & Zijlstra, G. (2000). Idea production in nominal and virtual groups: Does computer-mediated communication improve group brainstorming? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 141-159.