Doubts about the positive impact of static type systems on programming tasks in single developer projects - An empirical study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6183 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 300-303

  Hanenberg, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC TYPE SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL METHOD; EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PROGRAMMING TASKS; RESEARCH METHODS; STATIC TYPE SYSTEMS; TYPE SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 77955015982     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14107-2_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Cardelli, L.: Type Systems. In: CRC Handbook of Computer Science and Engineering, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)
2. Conover, W.J.: Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1998)
3. Gannon, J.D.: An Experimental Evaluation of Data Type Conventions. ACM Comm. 20(8), 584-595 (1977)
4. Hanenberg, S.: An experiment for measuring the difference between statically and dynamically typed programming languages in single developer projects, Technical Report, University of Duisburg-Essen (to appear in June 2010)
5. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
6. Pierce, B.: Types and Programming Languages. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)
7. Prechelt, L., Tichy, W.: A Controlled Experiment to Assess the Benefits of Procedure Argument Type Checking. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(4), 302-312 (1998)
8. Tratt, L., Wuyts, R.: Dynamically Typed Languages. IEEE Software 24(5), 28-30 (2007)
9. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)