Smoke gets in your eyes: Offence, harm and the good life

Public Health Ethics

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 89-90

  Dawson, Angus ^a   Verweij, Marcel ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SMOKE; SMOKING;

EID: 77955014508     PISSN: 17549973     EISSN: 17549981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/phe/phq018     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Basham, P. and Luik, J. (2010).Working Class Are Under Attack from Health Paternalism. The Guardian (29th April).
2. Dawson, A. (2010). The Future of Bioethics: Three Dogmas and a Cup of Hemlock. Bioethics, 24, 218-225.
3. Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. (2008). The Steward of the Millian State. Public Health Ethics, 1, 193-195.
4. DiFranza, J. R., Aligne, A. and Weitzman, M. (2004). Prenatal and Postnatal EnvironmentalTobacco Smoke Exposure andChildren'sHealth. Pediatrics, 113, 1007-1015.
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2004). Tobacco Smoking and Involuntary Smoking. IARCMonographs on the Evaluation of Carinogenic Risks to Humans Vol. 83. Lyon: IARC.
6. Jennings, B. (2009). Public Health and Liberty: Beyond theMillian Paradigm. Public Health Ethics, 2, 123-134.
7. Verweij, M. (2007). Tobacco Discouragement: A Non-Paternalistic Argument. In Dawson, A. and Verweij, M. (eds), Ethics, Prevention and PublicHealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.