Fine tuning in general gauge mediation

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2010, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Kobayashi, Tatsuo ^a   Nakai, Yuichiro ^b   Takahashi, Ryo ^b,c  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KERNPHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Supersymmetric standard model; Supersymmetry breaking

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954999752     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2010)003     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yanagida, Renormalization group analysis on the Higgs mass in the softly broken supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 54
2. Z?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1815
3. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, On radiative corrections to supersymmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches, Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 477
4. M. S. Carena, M. Quirós and C. E. M. Wagner, Effective potential methods and the Higgs mass spectrum in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 407 [hep-ph/9508343]
5. M. S. Carena et al., Reconciling the two-loop diagrammatic and effective field theory computations of the mass of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 29 [hep-ph/0001002]
6. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, H. Komatsu and S. Takeshita, Low-energy parameters and particle masses in a supersymmetric grand unified model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67 (1982) 1889
7. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, H. Komatsu and S. Takeshita, Aspects of grand unified models with softly broken supersymmetry, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 927
8. [Erratum Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983) 330]
9. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, H. Komatsu and S. Takeshita, Renormalization of supersymmetry breaking parameters revisited, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71 (1984) 413
10. L × U (1) symmetry breaking as a radiative effect of supersymmetry breaking in GUTS, Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 215
11. L. Alvarez-Gaumé, M. Claudson and M. B. Wise, Low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 207 (1982) 96
12. L. E. Ibáñez and C. Lopez, N = 1 supergravity, the weak scale and the low-energy particle spectrum, Nucl. Phys. B 233 (1984) 511
13. L. E. Ibáñez, C. Lopez and C. Muñoz, The low-energy supersymmetric spectrum according to N = 1 supergravity GUTS, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 218
14. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63
15. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis and S. Pokorski, The fine-tuning price of LEP, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 327 [hep-ph/9712234]
16. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Haggling over the fine-tuning price of LEP, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 39 [hep-ph/9808275]
17. G. L. Kane and S. F. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [hep-ph/9810374]
18. M. Bastero-Gil, G. L. Kane and S. F. King, Fine-tuning constraints on supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 103 [hep-ph/9910506]
19. G. L. Kane, J. D. Lykken, B. D. Nelson and L.-T. Wang, Re-examination of electroweak symmetry breaking in supersymmetry and implications for light superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 551 (2003) 146 [hep-ph/0207168]
20. A. Brignole, J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Navarro, Low-scale supersymmetry breaking: effective description, electroweak breaking and phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 666 (2003) 105 [hep-ph/0301121]
21. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, The MSSM fine tuning problem: a way out, JHEP 01 (2004) 008 [hep-ph/0310137]
22. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments. I: application to SUSY and seesaw cases, JHEP 11 (2004) 057 [hep-ph/0410298]
23. P. Batra, A. Delgado, D. E. Kaplan and T. M. P. Tait, The Higgs mass bound in gauge extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 02 (2004) 043 [hep-ph/0309149]
24. K. Agashe and M. Graesser, Improving the fine tuning in models of low energy gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9704206]
25. R. Harnik, G. D. Kribs, D. T. Larson and H. Murayama, The minimal supersymmetric fat Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 015002 [hep-ph/0311349]
26. S. Chang, C. Kilic and R. Mahbubani, The new fat Higgs: slimmer and more attractive, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 015003 [hep-ph/0405267]
27. A. Delgado and T. M. P. Tait, A fat Higgs with a fat top, JHEP 07 (2005) 023 [hep-ph/0504224]
28. T. Kobayashi and H. Terao, Suppressed supersymmetry breaking terms in the Higgs sector, JHEP 07 (2004) 026 [hep-ph/0403298]
29. T. Kobayashi, H. Nakano and H. Terao, Induced top Yukawa coupling and suppressed Higgs mass parameters, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 115009 [hep-ph/0502006]
30. T. Kobayashi, H. Terao and A. Tsuchiya, Fine-tuning in gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking models and induced top Yukawa coupling, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015002 [hep-ph/0604091]
31. A. Birkedal, Z. Chacko and Y. Nomura, Relaxing the upper bound on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 015006 [hep-ph/0408329]
32. A. Birkedal, Z. Chacko and M. K. Gaillard, Little supersymmetry and the supersymmetric little hierarchy problem, JHEP 10 (2004) 036 [hep-ph/0404197]
33. Z. Chacko, Y. Nomura and D. Tucker-Smith, A minimally fine-tuned supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 725 (2005) 207 [hep-ph/0504095]
34. K. Choi, K. S. Jeong, T. Kobayashi and K.-i. Okumura, Little SUSY hierarchy in mixed modulus-anomaly mediation, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 355 [hep-ph/0508029]
35. K. Choi, K. S. Jeong, T. Kobayashi and K.-i. Okumura, TeV scale mirage mediation and natural little SUSY hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 095012 [hep-ph/0612258]
36. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039]
37. A. Falkowski, S. Pokorski and M. Schmaltz, Twin SUSY, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 035003 [hep-ph/0604066]
38. S. Chang, L. J. Hall and N. Weiner, A supersymmetric twin Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 035009 [hep-ph/0604076]
39. G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Living dangerously with low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006) 19 [hep-ph/0606105]
40. R. Dermisek and H. D. Kim, Radiatively generated maximal mixing scenario for the Higgs mass and the least fine tuned minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 211803 [hep-ph/0601036]
41. R. Dermisek, H. D. Kim and I.-W. Kim, Mediation of supersymmetry breaking in gauge messenger models, JHEP 10 (2006) 001 [hep-ph/0607169]
42. R. Essig and J.-F. Fortin, The minimally tuned minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 04 (2008) 073 [arXiv:0709.0980]
43. R, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 105002 [arXiv:0907.0728]
44. D. Horton and G. G. Ross, Naturalness and focus points with non-universal gaugino masses, arXiv:0908.0857
45. R. Dermisek, Unusual Higgs or supersymmetry from natural electroweak symmetry breaking, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24 (2009) 1631 [arXiv:0907.0297]
46. P. W. Graham, A. Ismail, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, A little solution to the little hierarchy problem: a vector-like generation, arXiv:0910.3020
47. H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and Y. Omura, Relaxed fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0703044]
48. K. Choi, A. Falkowski, H. P. Nilles, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Stability of flux compactifications and the pattern of supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 11 (2004) 076 [hep-th/0411066]
49. K. Choi, A. Falkowski, H. P. Nilles and M. Olechowski, Soft supersymmetry breaking in KKLT flux compactification, Nucl. Phys. B 718 (2005) 113 [hep-th/0503216]
50. K. Choi, K. S. Jeong and K.-i. Okumura, Phenomenology of mixed modulus-anomaly mediation in fluxed string compactifications and brane models, JHEP 09 (2005) 039 [hep-ph/0504037]
51. M. Endo, M. Yamaguchi and K. Yoshioka, A bottom-up approach to moduli dynamics in heavy gravitino scenario: superpotential, soft terms and sparticle mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 015004 [hep-ph/0504036]
52. A. Brignole, L. E. Ibáñez and C. Muñoz, Towards a theory of soft terms for the supersymmetric Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B 422 (1994) 125
53. [Erratum Nucl. Phys. B 436 (1995) 747] [hep-ph/9308271]
54. T. Kobayashi, D. Suematsu, K. Yamada and Y. Yamagishi, Nonuniversal soft scalar masses in superstring theories, Phys. Lett. B 348 (1995) 402 [hep-ph/9408322]
55. L. E. Ibáñez, C. Muñoz and S. Rigolin, Aspects of type-I string phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 553 (1999) 43 [hep-ph/9812397]
56. J. R. Ellis, C. Kounnas and D. V. Nanopoulos, No scale supersymmetric GUTS, Nucl. Phys. B 247 (1984) 373
57. J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, Gaugino masses and grand unification, Phys. Lett. B 155 (1985) 381
58. M. Drees, Phenomenological consequences of N = 1 supergravity theories with nonminimal kinetic energy terms for vector superfields, Phys. Lett. B 158 (1985) 409
59. G. Anderson et al., Motivations for and implications of non-universal GUT-scale boundary conditions for soft SUSY-breaking parameters, in the proceedings of 1996DPF/DPB Summer Study on New Directions for High-Energy Physics (Snowmass 96) June 25-July 25, Snowmass, Colorado U. S. A. (1996), hep-ph/9609457
60. K. Huitu, Y. Kawamura, T. Kobayashi and K. Puolamaki, Phenomenological constraints on SUSY SU (5) GUTs with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 035001 [hep-ph/9903528]
61. S. P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses from non-singlet F-terms in non-minimal unified models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095019 [arXiv:0903.3568]
62. K. J. Bae, R. Dermisek, H. D. Kim and I.-W. Kim, Mixed Bino-Wino-Higgsino dark matter in gauge messenger models, JCAP 08 (2007) 014 [hep-ph/0702041]
63. H. Abe, Y. G. Kim, T. Kobayashi and Y. Shimizu, TeV scale partial mirage unification and neutralino dark matter, JHEP 09 (2007) 107 [arXiv:0706.4349]
64. R, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095016 [arXiv:0908.0731]
65. C. Cheung, A. L. Fitzpatrick and D. Shih, (Extra) ordinary gauge mediation, JHEP 07 (2008) 054 [arXiv:0710.3585]
66. G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419 [hep-ph/9801271]
67. P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General gauge mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0801.3278]
68. L. M. Carpenter, M. Dine, G. Festuccia and J. D. Mason, Implementing general gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035002 [arXiv:0805.2944]
69. H. Ooguri, Y. Ookouchi, C.-S. Park and J. Song, Current correlators for general gauge mediation, Nucl. Phys. B 808 (2009) 121 [arXiv:0806.4733]
70. J. Distler and D. Robbins, General F-term gauge mediation, arXiv:0807.2006
71. K. A. Intriligator and M. Sudano, Comments on general gauge mediation, JHEP 11 (2008) 008 [arXiv:0807.3942]
72. M. Buican, P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, Exploring general gauge mediation, JHEP 03 (2009) 016 [arXiv:0812.3668]
73. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, Dirac gauginos in general gauge mediation, Nucl. Phys. B 816 (2009) 185 [arXiv:0811.4409]
74. L. M. Carpenter, Surveying the phenomenology of general gauge mediation, arXiv:0812.2051
75. D. Marques, Generalized messenger sector for gauge mediation of supersymmetry breaking and the soft spectrum, JHEP 03 (2009) 038 [arXiv:0901.1326]
76. M. Luo and S. Zheng, Gauge extensions of supersymmetric models and hidden valleys, JHEP 04 (2009) 122 [arXiv:0901.2613]
77. A. Rajaraman, Y. Shirman, J. Smidt and F. Yu, Parameter space of general gauge mediation, Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 367 [arXiv:0903.0668]
78. D. Koschade, M. McGarrie and S. Thomas, Direct mediation and metastable supersymmetry breaking for SO (10), arXiv:0909.0233
79. M. Buican and Z. Komargodski, Soft terms from broken symmetries, arXiv:0909.4824
80. R. Essig, Implications of the LEP Higgs bounds for the MSSM stop sector, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 095005 [hep-ph/0702104]
81. C. Csáki, A. Falkowski, Y. Nomura and T. Volansky, New approach to the μ - Bμ problem of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 111801 [arXiv:0809.4492]
82. S. Abel, M. J. Dolan, J. Jaeckel and V. V. Khoze, Phenomenology of pure general gauge mediation, arXiv:0910.2674