Generalized dc and ac Josephson effects in antiferromagnets and in antiferromagnetic d-wave superconductors

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Chasse D ^a   Tremblay, A M S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954996782     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.115102     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. F. P. Esposito, L.-P. Guay, R. B. MacKenzie, M. B. Paranjape, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 241602 (2007) The Lagrangian in this paper should have included the Berry phase term to obtain the correct equations of motion for the Heisenberg model. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.241602
2. P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and A. I. Larkin, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 7933 (1990). 10.1088/0953-8984/2/39/008
3. P. Bruno and V. K. Dugaev, Phys. Rev. B 72, 241302 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.241302
4. Y. L. Lee and Y. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 68, 184413 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.184413
5. F. S. Nogueira and K. H. Bennemann, Europhys. Lett. 67, 620 (2004). 10.1209/epl/i2003-10305-x
6. J. Wang and K. S. Chan, Phys. Rev. B 74, 035342 (2006) For the model of the junction considered in this paper, the coupling between the ferromagnets on either side of the junction should be antiferromagnetic instead of ferromagnetic as claimed. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.035342
7. A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsvetkov, R. V. Pisarev, and T. Rasing, Nature (London) 429, 850 (2004). 10.1038/nature02659
8. J. Linder, M. S. Gronsleth, and A. Sudbo, Phys. Rev. B 75, 024508 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.024508
9. D. Chassé, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Sherbrooke, 2009.
10. M. P. Anantram, M. S. Lundstrom, and D. E. Nikonov, Proc. IEEE 96, 1511 (2008). 10.1109/JPROC.2008.927355
11. Y. G. Shen and Z. H. Yang, EPL 78, 17003 (2007). 10.1209/0295-5075/78/ 17003
12. J. R. Schrieffer, X. G. Wen, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.11663
13. We limit ourselves to nearest-neighbor hopping to simplify the expression of the transformation amplitudes, but the main result of this paper, namely, formula for the equilibrium current of the staggered magnetic moment, is also valid for an extended model. Dissipationless spin current will occur if U is large enough that there is a gap to quasiparticle excitations.
14. I. V. Bobkova, P. J. Hirschfeld, and Yu. S. Barash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 037005 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.037005
15. A. F. Andreev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 46, 1823 (1964)
16. A. F. Andreev, [Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1228 (1964)].
17. V. Ambegaokar and A. Baratoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 486 (E) (1963) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.486
18. V. Ambegaokar and A. Baratoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 104 (1963). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.104
19. A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 128, 1437 (1962). 10.1103/PhysRev.128.1437
20. L. N. Bulaevskii, C. D. Batista, M. V. Mostovoy, and D. I. Khomskii, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024402 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024402
21. C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 82, 565 (1951). 10.1103/PhysRev.82.565
22. B. Kyung, Phys. Rev. B 62, 9083 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.9083
23. G. C. Psaltakis and E. W. Fenton, J. Phys. C 16, 3913 (1983). In fact, the spin-triplet pair amplitude is dynamically generated, even when W = 0. This can be seen by computing the mean-field equation from the stationary condition of the free energy, ∂F/∂t=0, where t is the spin-triplet order parameter defined in Eq.(40). 10.1088/0022-3719/16/20/015
24. M. Murakami and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 2784 (1998). 10.1143/JPSJ.67.2784
25. G. Ishii, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 1525 (1970). 10.1143/PTP.44.1525
26. P. M. R. Brydon, Phys. Rev. B 80, 224520 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80. 224520
27. G. Ovsyannikov, K. Constantinian, Y. Kislinski, A. Shadrin, A. Zaitsev, V. Demidov, I. Borisenko, A. Kalabukhov, and D. Winkler, arXiv:1001.0963 (unpublished).