Is criminology moving toward a paradigm shift? evidence from a survey of the american society of criminology

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 332-347

  Cooper, Jonathon A ^a   Walsh, Anthony ^a   Ellis, Lee ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954985217     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2010.487830     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews, D. A., and J. Stephen Wormith. 1989. Personality and crime: Knowledge destruction and construction in criminology. Justice Quarterly 6: 289-309.
2. Barak, G. 1998. Integrating criminologies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Blankenship, M., and S. Wachholz. 1989. Confronting ideology: The hidden agenda of criminological theory. Quarterly Journal of Ideology 13: 2-9.
4. Cooper, J. A., L. Ellis, and A. Walsh. 2008. Criminologists' opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency: A follow-up. The Criminologist 33: 23-26.
5. Cullen, F. 2005. Challenging individualistic theories of crime. In G.-G. Susan, A. J. Trevino, and A. K. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding crime: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 55-60). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
6. Cullen, F. 2009. Foreword. In A. Walsh and K. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research (pp. xv-xvii). New York: Routledge.
7. Dantzker, M. L. 1998. Criminology and criminal justice: Comparing, contrasting, and intertwining disciplines. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
8. Ellis, L., and H. Hoffman. 1990. Views of contemporary criminologists on causes and theories of crime. In L. Ellis and H. Hoffman (Eds.), Crime in biological, social, and moral contexts (pp. 50-58). New York: Praeger.
9. Ellis, L., and A. Walsh. 1999. Criminologists' opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency. The Criminologist 24: 4-6.
10. Ellis, L., and A. Walsh. 2000. Criminology: A global perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Lilly, J. R., F. Cullen, and R. A. Ball.2007. Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Okasha, S. 2002. The philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Pinker, S. 2002. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
15. Singer, P. 2000. A Darwinian left: Politics, evolution, and cooperation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Sowell, T. 1987. A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: William Morrow.
17. van den Berghe, P. 1990. Why most sociologists don't (and won't) think evolutionarily. Sociological Forum 5: 173-185.
18. Walsh, A. 1997. Methodological individualism and vertical integration in the social sciences. Behavior and Philosophy 25: 1-16.
19. Walsh, A. 2002. Biosocial criminology: Introduction and integration. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
20. Walsh, A., and L. Ellis. 2004. Ideology: Criminology's Achilles' heel? Quarterly Journal of Ideology 27: 1-25.
21. Walsh, A., and E. Lee. 1999. Political ideology and American criminologists' explanations for criminal behavior. The Criminologist 24: 26-27.
22. Williams, F. P. 1984. The demise of the criminological imagination: A critique of recent criminology. Justice Quarterly 1: 91-106.
23. Williams, F. P.1999. Imagining criminology: An alternative paradigm. New York: Garland.
24. Wright, J. P., D. Boisvert, K. Dietrich, and M. Douglas Ris. 2009. The ghost in the machine and criminal behavior: Criminology for the 21st century. In A. Walsh and K. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research (pp. 73-89). New York: Routledge.
25. Wright, R. A., and J. M. Miller. 1998. Taboo until today? The coverage of biological arguments in criminology textbooks, 1961 to 1970 and 1987 to 1996. Journal of Criminal Justice 26: 1-19.