Disclosure patterns of mode of conception among mothers and fathers-5-year follow-up of the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) cohort

Human Reproduction

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2006-2017

  Rosholm, Rikke ^a   Lund, Rikke ^a   Molbo, Drude ^a   Schmidt, Lone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

clinical epidemiology; disclosure; infertility; longitudinal cohort study; medically assisted reproduction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPTION; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GAMETE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL STATUS; SPERM DONOR; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 77954969718     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq153     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbey A, Andrews FM, Halman JL. Gender's role in responses to infertility. Psychol Women Quart 1991;15:295-316.
2. Andrews FM, Abbey A, Halman JL. Is infertility-problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:1247-1253.
3. Braverman AM, Boxer AS, Corson SL, Coutifaris C, Hendrix A. Characteristics and attitudes of parents of children born with the use of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 1998;70:860-865.
4. Casey P, Readings J, Blake L, Jadva V, Golombok S. Child development and parent-child relationships in surrogacy, egg donation and donor insemination families at age 7. Paper Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Barcelona, Spain, July, 2008.
5. Colpin H, Bossaert G. Adolescents conceived by IVF: parenting and psychosocial adjustment. Hum Reprod 2008;23:2724-2730.
6. Colpin H, Soenen S. Parenting and psychosocial development of IVF children: a follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1116-1123. (Pubitemid 34411156)
7. Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A, Murray C. Disclosure of insemination: Parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1995;65:549-559.
8. Daniels K. Donor gametes: anonymous or identified? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21:113-128.
9. Daniels K, Gillett W, Grace V. Parental information sharing with donor insemination conceived offspring: a follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1099-1105.
10. Daniels KR, Thorn P. Sharing information with donor insemination offspring. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1792-1796.
11. ESHRE. Focus Reprod 2008;September:8.
12. Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Cook R, Giavazzi MT, Guerra D, Montovani A, van Hall E, Crosignani PGC, Dexeus S. The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2324-2331.
13. Golombok S, MacCallum F, Goodman E, Rutter M. Families with children conceived by donor insemination: a follow-up at age twelve. Child Dev 2002;73:952-968.
14. Golombok S, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Jadva V, Murray C, Rust J, Abdalla H, Jenkins J, Margara R. Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. J Fam Psychol 2004;18:443-452.
15. Golombok S, Murray C, Jadva V, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Rust J. Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3. Hum Reprod 2006;29:1918-1924.
16. Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad F. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couple's attitudes. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2052-2056.
17. Greenfeld DA. The impact of disclosure on donor gametes participants: donors, intended parents and offspring. Current Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008;20:265-268.
18. Greenfeld DA, Ort SI, Greenfeld DG, Jones EE, Olive DL. Attitudes of IVF parents regarding the IVF experience and their children. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:266-274.
19. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdal P, Olesen F, Ribacke M, Spenser T, Szécsényi J. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice: an international comparison. Fam Pract 1999;16:4-11.
20. Hansen EJ. Socialgrupper i Danmark [Social classes in Denmark]. Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research, 1984.
21. Hjelmstedt A, Widström A-M, Wramsby H, Collins A. Emotional adaptation following successful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1254-1264. http://www.fertilitetsselskab.dk 6 September 2009, Annual report 2008 last date accessed.
22. Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, Golombok S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparison by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1909-1918.
23. Kirkman M. Parents' contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2229-2242.
24. Kirkman M, Rosenthal D, Johnson L. Families working it out: adolescents views on communicating about donor-assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2318-2324.
25. Lalos A, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinking. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1759-1768.
26. Ludwig AK, Katalinic A, Jendrysik J, Thyen U, Sutcliffe AG, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Attitudes towards disclosure of conception mode in 899 pregnancies conceived after ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16:10-17.
27. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, Golombok S. School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents' disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod 2005;20:810-819.
28. Mac Dougall K, Becker G, Scheib JE, Nachtigall RD. Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertil Steril 2007;87:524-533.
29. Mainz J, Vedsted P, Olesen F. Hvordan vurderer patienterne de praktiserende læger? [How do patients' evaluate their general practitioner? in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2000;162:654-658.
30. Murray C, Golombok S. Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: follow-up at age 2. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1655-1660. (Pubitemid 40852263)
31. Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Wozny M. The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men's and women's response to infertility. Fertil Steril 1992;57:113-121.
32. Nyboe Andersen A, Goosens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Muzon J, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1267-1287.
33. Olivennes F, Blanchet V, Kerbrat V, Fanchin R, Rufat P, Frydman R. Follow-up of a cohort of 422 children aged 6 to 13 years conceived by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1997;67:284-289. (Pubitemid 27052186)
34. Panagopoulou E, Pau E, Vedhara K, Gaintarzti C, Tarlatzis B. Emotionally expressive coping reduces pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2006;86:672-677.
35. Panagopoulou E, Montgomery A, Tarlatzis B. Experimental emotional disclosure in women undergoing infertility treatment: are drop outs better off? Soc Sci Med 2009;69:678-681.
36. Peters C, Kantaris X, Barnes J, Sutcliffe A. Parental attitudes toward disclosure of the mode of conception to their child conceived by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2005;83:914-919.
37. Rumball A, Adair V. Telling the story: parents' scripts for donor offspring. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1392-1399.
38. Schmidt L. Psykosociale konsekvenser af infertilitet og behandling [Psychosocial consequences of infertility and treatment, in Danish]. PhD thesis. Copenhagen: FADL's Publishers 1996.
39. Schmidt L. Infertile couples' assessment of infertility treatment. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1998;77:649-653.
40. Schmidt L. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences. [Doctoral thesis]. Dan Med Bull 2006; 53:390-417. http://www.danmedbul.dk/Dmb-2006/0406/0406-disputatser/DMB3808.htm.
41. Schmidt L, Holstein BE, Boivin J, Sa?ngren H, Tjørnhøj- Thomsen T, Blaabjerg J, Hald F, Nyboe Andersen A, Rasmussen PE. Patients' attitudes to medical and psychosocial aspects of care in fertility clinics: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI) Research Programme. Hum Reprod 2003a; 18:628-637.
42. Schmidt L, Holstein B, Boivin J, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Blaabjerg J, Hald F, Rasmussen PE, Nyboe Andersen A. High ratings of satisfaction with fertility treatment are common: findings from the Copenhagen Multi-centre Psychosocial (COMPI) Research Programme. Hum Reprod 2003b;18:2638-2646.
43. Schmidt L, Holstein BE, Christensen U, Boivin J. Does infertility cause marital benefit? An epidemiological study of 2250 women and men in fertility treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2005a;59:244-251.
44. Schmidt L, Christensen U, Holstein BE. The social epidemiology of coping with infertility. Hum Reprod 2005b;20:1044-1052.
45. Schmidt L, Holstein BE, Christensen U, Boivin J. Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: a cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2005c;20:3248-3256.
46. Siegel S, Dittrich R, Vollmann J. Ethical opinions and personal attitudes of young adults conceived by in vitro fertilisation. J Med Ethics 2008; 34:236-240.
47. Sundby J, Schmidt L, Heldaas K, Bugge S, Tanbo T. Consequences of IVF among women: 10 years post-treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2007;28:115-120.
48. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. "It's a bit unmanly in a way": men and infertility in Denmark. In: Inhorn MC, Tjørnhø j-Thomsen T, Goldberg H, la Cour Mosegaard M (eds)., Reconceiving the Second Sex, Male, Masculinity, and Reproduction. New York: Berghan Books, 2009, 226-262.