Privacy is dead, get over it! 1 Information privacy and the dream of a risk-free society

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 185-197

  Rauhofer, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

data protection; information privacy; risk management; risk perception; social control

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954948284     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600830802472990     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Benett, C. J., and Raab, C. D., 2006. The Governance of Privacy, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Benjamin, V. O., 2007. Interceptions of Internet communications and the right to privacy: An evaluation of some provisions of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act against the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 6: 637–648.
3. Berstein, P. L., 1998. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Bloustein, E., 1964. Privacy as an aspect of human dignity: An answer to Dean Prosser. New York University Law Review, 39: 1000–1007.
5. Cannataci, J. A., and Mifsud-Bonnici, J. P., 2005. Data protection comes of age: The data protection clauses in the European Constitutional Treaty. Information & Communications Technology Law, 14 (1): 5–15.
6. Cooley, T. M., 1880. A Treatise on the Law of Torts, Or the Wrongs Which Arise Independent of Contract, 2nd edn, Chicago, IL: Callaghan & Co.
7. Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and Culture, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Foucault, M., 1995[1975]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Vintage Books.
9. Ganley, P., 2002. Access to the individual: Digital rights management systems and the intersection of informational and decisional privacy interests. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 10 (3): 241–293.
10. Leigh, I., and Lustgarten, L., 1994. In from the Cold: National Security and Parliamentary Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Lyon, D., 2003. Surveillance after September 11, Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Moakes, J., 1986. Data protection in Europe—Part 1. Journal of International Banking Law, 1 (2): 77–86.
13. Power, M., 2004. The Risk Management of Everything, London: Demos.
14. Regan, P., 1995. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values and Public Policy, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
15. Royal Society. 1992. Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management: Report of a Royal Society Study Group, London: Royal Society.
16. Savage, N., and Edwards, C., 1986. Transborder data flows: The European Convention and United Kingdom legislation. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 35 (3): 710–717.
17. Schneier, B., 2003. Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World, New York: Copernikus Books.
18. Short, J. F., Jr. 1984. The social fabric at risk: Toward the social transformation of risk analysis. American Sociological Review, 49: 711–725.
19. Simitis, S., 1984. Die informationelle Selbstbestimmung—Grundbedingung einer verfassungskonformen Informationsordnung. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,: 394–405.
20. Slovic, P., 1998. “ Perception of risk ”. In Risk and Modern Society, Edited by: Löfst, R., and Frewer, L., London: Earthscan.
21. Sprenger, P., 1999. Sun on privacy: ‘Get over it’. Wired, Available online at: http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538 (accessed 14 January 2008)
22. Sunstein, C. R., 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (The Seeley Lectures), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Warren, S. D., and Brandeis, L. D., 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4: 193–220.
24. Weichert, T., 2001. Die Ökonomisierung des Rechts auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift,: 1463–1466.