Recent case developments in health law

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 436-440

  Wevers, Kate ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD ADVOCACY; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

CHILD ADVOCACY; DECISION MAKING; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; FEMALE; FETUS; FLORIDA; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMED CONSENT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; TREATMENT REFUSAL; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 77954940828     PISSN: 10731105     EISSN: 1748720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00502.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. No. 2009 CA 1167 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Mar. 27, 2009) (order authorizing medical treatment)
2. 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973); see also , 678 So.2d 455, 456 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996); A.C., 573 A.2d 1235, 1241-42 (D.C. 1990)
3. Second Amended Initial Brief for Appellant at 10-11, 14-15, , No. 1D09-1958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. filed Apr. 20, 2009).
4. Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, and American Medical Women's Association in Support of Appellant at 5-7, , No. 1D09-1958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. filed Apr. 20, 2009).
5. Appellant's Brief, note 5, at 11; Amicus Brief, note 6, at 5; both citing Guardianship of Browning, 568 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1990).
6. Appellant's Brief, note 5, at 10-18; Amicus Brief, note 6, at 5-7.
7. Amicus Brief, note 6, at 7-15.
8. Appellant's Brief, note 5, at 17; Amicus Brief, note 6, at 20.
9. Amicus Brief, note 6, at 20.
10. Appellant's Brief, note 5, at 12-17.
11. Dubreuil, 629 So.2d 819 (Fla. 1993)
12. Appellee State of Florida's Answer Brief at 5-9, , No. 1D09-1958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. filed Apr. 20, 2009).
13. Amended Reply Brief for Appellant at 1-3, 10, , No. 1D09-1958 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. filed Apr. 20, 2009).
14. Baby Boy Doe, 632 N.E.2d 326 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994)
15. Fetus Brown, 689 N.E.2d 397 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997)
16. Gallagher J. " Prenatal Invasions & Interventions: What's Wrong With Fetal Rights," Harvard Women's Law Journal 1987, 10:9-58. at 55
17. Levine E M. " The Constitutionality of Court-Ordered Cesarean Surgery: A Threshold Question," Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 1994, 4:229-309. at 302
18. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Maternal Decision Making, Ethics, and the Law, Committee Opinion No. 321, (Nov., 2005): at 9.
19. 274 S.E.2d 457, 460 (Ga. 1981)
20. 66 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (N.D. Fla. 1999)
21. Levine, note 25, at 301.
22. See, e.g., note 4; note 23; note 4.
23. " Legal Interventions During Pregnancy: Court-Ordered Medical Treatments and Legal Penalties for Potentially Harmful Behavior by Pregnant Women," JAMA 1990, 264(no. 20):2663-2770. American Medical Association Board of Trustees Report, at 2665