Systematic reviews and metaanalyses: Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals;Systematische übersichtsarbeiten und metaanalysen erstellung, bedeutung und interpretation

Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie

Volumn 45, Issue 7-8, 2010, Pages 510-518

  Schnabel, Alexander ^a   Kranke, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; META ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 77954939847     PISSN: 09392661     EISSN: 14391074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996 312 71-72
2. Becke K, Höhne C, Jöhr M, Reich A. Stellungnahme des wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises Kinderanästhesie der DGAI zum kaudalen Einsatz von S(+)-Ketamin. Anästh Intensivmed 2007 48 298-299
3. Rytina S. Evidenzbasierte Medizin. Der gefährlich lückenhafte Medizin-TÜV. Gehirn & Geist 2010 5 30-36
4. Choi PT, Halpern SH, Malik N, Jadad AR, Tramer MR, Walder B. Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: A critical appraisal of systematic reviews. Anesth Analg 2001 92 700-709
5. Levin A. The cochrane collaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001 135 309-312
6. Sackett DL, Straus S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB, Hrsg. Evidence-based medicine - how to practice and teach EBM. London Churchill Livingstone 2000
7. Antes G, Bassler D, Galandi D. Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten ihre Rolle in der evidenz-basierten Gesundheitsversorgung. Dtsch Arztebl Int 1999 96 616-622
8. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996 276 637-639
9. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009 339
10. Kranke P. Effective literature searching. Focusing the question and using PubMed queries. Anaesthesist 2004 53 286-289
11. McAuley L, Pham B, Tugwell P, Moher D. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 2000 356 1228-1231
12. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev MR 000001 2007
13. Guasch RG, Castillo J, Cifuentes I. The fate of abstracts presented at 1995 european society of anaesthesiologists congress. 2001 18 2-2
14. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev MR 000005 2007
15. Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in english and german. Lancet 1997 350 326-329
16. Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998 279 281-286
17. Pittler MH, Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Ernst E. Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies. J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 485-489
18. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996 17 1-12
19. Kranke P, Eberhart LHJ. Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten in der Anästhesie Erstellung, Bedeutung und Interpretation. A&I 2002 43 399-410
20. Carlisle JB. Systematic reviews: How they work and how to use them. Anaesthesia 2007 62 702-707
21. Roll S, Keil T, Rosenfeld S, Willich SN. Number needed to treat: Definition, interpretation and relevance. Gesundheitswesen 2009 71 694-699
22. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures. BMJ 1997 315 1533-1537
23. Song F. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Is the L'abbe plot useful? J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52 725-730
24. Ioannidis JP. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2008 14 951-957
25. Davey Smith G, Egger M, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis. Beyond the grand mean? BMJ 1997 315 1610-1614
26. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997 315 629-634
27. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 2006 333 597-600
28. Bolton CM, Myles PS, Nolan T, Sterne JA. Prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing tonsillectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2006 97 593-604