Of categorizers and describers: An evaluation of quantitative measures for tagging motivation

HT'10 - Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 157-166

  Körner, Christian ^a   Kern, Roman ^b   Grahsl, Hans Peter ^c   Strohmaier, Markus ^b  

^a Knowledge Management Institute   (Austria)

^b KNOW CENTER   (Austria)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Measures; Social software; Tagging; User motivation

Indexed keywords

EMERGENT STRUCTURE; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; FOLKSONOMIES; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; SOCIAL SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MEASURES; STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS; TAGGING SYSTEMS; USER BEHAVIORS; USER MOTIVATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; MOTIVATION; THESAURI;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77954908361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1810617.1810645     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. M. Ames and M. Naaman. Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 971-980, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
2. C. Cattuto, C. Schmitz, A. Baldassarri, V. D. P. Servedio, V. Loreto, A. Hotho, M. Grahl, and G. Stumme. Network Properties of Folksonomies. AI Communications, 20:245-262, 2007.
3. T. Coates. Two cultures of fauxonomies collide. http://www.plasticbag. org/archives/2005/06/two-cultures-of-fauxonomies-collide/. Last access: May, 8:2008, 2005.
4. S. Golder and B. Huberman. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2):198, 2006.
5. T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott. Social bookmarking tools (I). D-Lib Magazine, 11(4):1082-9873, 2005.
6. M. Heckner, M. Heilemann, and C. Wolff. Personal information management vs. resource sharing: Towards a model of information behaviour in social tagging systems. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), San Jose, CA, USA, May 2009.
7. M. Heckner, T. Neubauer, and C. Wolff. Tree, funny, to read, google: what are tags supposed to achieve? a comparative analysis of user keywords for different digital resource types. In SSM '08: Proceeding of the 2008 ACM workshop on Search in Social Media, pages 3-10, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
8. A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. BibSonomy: A social bookmark and publication sharing system. Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, pages 87-102, 2006.
9. A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. FolkRank: A Ranking Algorithm for Folksonomies. In Proc. FGIR 2006, 2006.
10. C. Körner. Understanding the motivation behind tagging. ACM Student Research Competition - Hypertext 2009, July 2009.
11. C. Körner, D. Benz, A. Hotho, M. Strohmaier, and G. Stumme. Stop thinking, start tagging: Tag semantics arise from collaborative verbosity. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '10, 2010. To appear.
12. C. Körner and M. Strohmaier. A call for social tagging datasets. ACM SIGWEB Newsletter, 2010.
13. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1):159-174, 1977.
14. C. Marlow, M. Naaman, D. Boyd, and M. Davis. Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, ickr, academic article, to read. In HYPERTEXT '06: Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 31-40, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
15. P. Mika. Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics. In Y. Gil, E. Motta, V. R. Benjamins, and M. A. Musen, editors, The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005, Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2005, Galway, Ireland, November 6-10, volume 3729 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 522-536. Springer, 2005.
16. O. Nov, M. Naaman, and C. Ye. Motivational, Structural and Tenure Factors that Impact Online Community Photo Sharing. In ICWSM '09: Proceedings of AAAI International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2009.
17. E. Rader and R. Wash. Inuences on tag choices in del.icio.us. In CSCW '08: Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 239-248, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
18. S. Sen, S. K. Lam, A. M. Rashid, D. Cosley, D. Frankowski, J. Osterhouse, F. M. Harper, and J. Riedl. tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 181-190, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
19. M. Strohmaier, C. Körner, and R. Kern. Why do users tag? detecting users' motivation for tagging in social tagging systems. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM2010), Washington, DC, USA, May 23-26, 2010.
20. R. Wash and E. Rader. Public bookmarks and private benefits: An analysis of incentives in social computing. In ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Citeseer, 2007.
21. Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. In Proceedings of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at the WWW 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2006.