Vitrification of canine cumulus-oocyte complexes in DAP213 with a cryotop holder

Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 115-120

  Abe, Yasuyuki ^a   Asano, Tomoyoshi ^a   Ali, Mohammed ^a   Suzuki, Hiroshi ^a  

^a OBIHIRO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Cryotop; DAP213; Dog; Oocyte

Indexed keywords

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; CUMULUS CELL; DOG; EMBRYO; GERMINAL VESICLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VITRIFICATION;

EID: 77954887469     PISSN: 14455781     EISSN: 14470578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12522-010-0045-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Rodrigues BA, Rodrigues JL. Responses of canine oocytes to in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization outcome. Theriogenology. 2006;66:1667-72.
2. Songsasen N, Wildt DE. Oocyte biology and challenges in developing in vitro maturation systems in the domestic dog. Anim Reprod Sci. 2007;98:2-22.
3. Abe Y, Lee DS, Kim SK, Suzuki H. Vitrification of canine oocytes. J Mammal Ova Res. 2008;25:32-6.
4. Nakagata N. Survival of mouse morulae and blastocysts derived from in vitro fertilization after ultra rapid freezing. Jikken Dobutsu. 1993;42:229-31.
5. Ishijima T, Kobayashi Y, Lee DS, Ueta YY, Matsui M, Lee JY, et al. Cryopreservation of canine ovaries by vitrification. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:293-9.
6. Fujihira T, Kishida R, Fukui Y. Developmental capacity of vitrified immature porcine oocytes following ICSI: effects of cytochalasin B and cryoprotectants. Cryobiology. 2004;49:286-90.
7. Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, Booth PJ, Jacobsen H, Greve T, et al. Open Pulled Straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51:53-8.
8. Lane M, Bavister BD, Lyons EA, Forest KT. Containerless vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1234-6.
9. Hochi S, Terao T, Kamei M, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Hirao M. Successful vitrification of pronuclear-stage rabbit zygotes by minimum volume cooling procedure. Theriogenology. 2004;61:267-75.
10. Whittingham DG. Embryo banks in the future of developmental genetics. Genetics. 1974;78:395-402.
11. Kartberg AJ, Hambiliki F, Arvidsson T, Stavreus-Evers A, Svalander P. Vitrification with DMSO protects embryo membrane integrity better than solutions without DMSO. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:378-84.
12. Pikal JM. Mechanisms of protein stabilization during freezedrying and storage: the relative importance of the thermodynamics stabilization and glassy state relaxation dynamics. In: Rey L, May JC, editors. Freeze-drying/ lyophilization of pharmaceutical and biological products. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1999. p. 161-98.
13. Takeda K, Murata K, Yamashita S. Thermodynamic investigation of glass transition in binary polyalcohols. J Non-Cryst Sol. 1998;231:273-9.
14. Pegg DE. Principles of cryopreservation. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;368:39-57.
15. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:608-14.
16. Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67:73-80.
17. Ushijima H, Yoshioka H, Esaki R, Takahashi K, Kuwayama M, Nakane T, et al. Improved survival of vitrified in vivo-derived porcine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2004;50:481-6.
18. Hara K, Abe Y, Kumada N, Aono N, Kobayashi J, Matsumoto H, et al. Extrusion and removal of lipid from the cytoplasm of porcine oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage: centrifugation under hypertonic conditions influences vitrification. Cryobiology. 2005;50:216-22.