Length weight allometries in lizards

Journal of Zoology

Volumn 281, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 218-226

  Meiri, S ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Body mass; Body size; Diet; Foraging mode; Legs; Shape; Snout vent length

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; AMPHIBIAN; BODY MASS; BODY SHAPE; BODY SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DIET; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LIMB; LIZARD; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

AMPHISBAENIA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 77954870243     PISSN: 09528369     EISSN: 14697998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00696.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Albert EM, Mauro DS, García-París M, Ruber L, Zardoya R. Effect of taxon sampling on recovering the phylogeny of squamate reptiles based on complete mitochondrial genome and nuclear gene sequence data. Genetics 2009, 441:12-21.
2. Andrade DV, Nascimento LB, Abe AS. Habits hidden underground: a review on the reproduction of the Amphisbaenia with notes on four Neotropical species. Amphibia-Reptilia 2006, 27:207-217.
3. Ashton KG, Feldman CR. Bergmann's rule in nonavian reptiles: turtles follow it, lizards and snakes reverse it. Evolution 2003, 57:1151-1163.
4. Bennett PM, Owens IPF. Variation among birds in vulnerability to extinction: chance or evolutionary predisposition? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 1997, 264:401-408.
5. Beuttell K, Losos JB. Ecological morphology of Caribbean anoles. Herp. Monogr. 1999, 13:1-28.
6. Boback SM. Body size evolution in snakes: evidence from island populations. Copeia 2003, 2003:81-94.
7. Buckley LB, Jetz W. Insularity and the determinants of lizard population density. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:481-489.
8. Calder WA. Size, function and life history 1984, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
9. Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielby J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, Orme CDL, Purvis A. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 2005, 309:1239-1241.
10. Christian KA, Tracy CR. Physical and biotic determinants of space utilization by the Galapagos land iguana (Conolophus pallidus). Oecologia 1985, 66:132-140.
11. Connor EF, Simberloff D. You can't falsify ecological hypotheses without data. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 1979, 60:154-155.
12. Conrad JL. Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. Bull. AMNH 2008, 310:1-182.
13. Dunning JB. CRC handbook of Avian body masses 2008, Second edn, London, CRC Press
14. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. Phylogenetic dependence and ecological data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 2002, 160:716-726.
15. Gans C. Tetrapod limblessness: evolution and functional corollaries. Am. Zool. 1975, 15:455-467.
16. Goodman BA, Hudson SC, Isaac JL, Schwarzkopf L. The evolution of body shape in response to habitat: is reproductive output reduced in flat lizards? Evolution 2009, 63:1279-1291.
17. Gould SJ. On size and shape. Nat. Hist. 1974, 83:20-26.
18. Gould SJ. On the scaling of tooth size in mammals. Am. Zool. 1975, 15:351-362.
19. Greer AE. Distribution of maximum snout-vent length among species of scincid lizards. J. Herp. 2001, 35:383-395.
20. Greer AE, Wadsworth L. Body shape in skinks: the relationship between relative hind limb length and relative snout-vent length. J. Herpetol. 2003, 37:554-559.
21. Haldane JBS. On being the right size. Possible worlds 1928, 20-28. In, New York, Harper
22. Hedges SB. The influence of size and phylogeny on life history variation in reptiles: a response to Stearns. Am. Nat. 1985, 126:258-260.
23. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25:1965-1978.
24. Huey RB, Pianka ER, Vitt LJ. How often do lizards "run on empty" ? Ecology 2001, 82:1-7.
25. Jenkins DG, Brescacin CR, Duxbury CV, Elliott JA, Evans JA, Grablow KR, Hillegass M, Lyon BN, Metzger GA, Olandese ML, Pepe D, Silvers GA, Suresch HN, Thompson TN, Trexler CM, Williams GE, Williams NC, Williams SE. Does size matter for dispersal distance? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:415-425.
26. Lande R. Evolutionary mechanisms of limb loss in tetrapods. Evolution 1978, 32:73-92.
27. Meiri S. Size evolution in island lizards. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:702-708.
28. Meiri S. Evolution and ecology of lizard body sizes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:724-734.
29. Meiri S, Dayan T. On the validity of Bergmann's rule. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30:331-351.
30. Meiri S, Dayan T, Simberloff D. Variability and correlations in carnivore crania and dentition. Funct. Ecol. 2005a, 19:337-343.
31. Meiri S, Dayan T, Simberloff D. Variability and sexual size dimorphism in carnivores: testing the niche variation hypothesis. Ecology 2005b, 86:1432-1440.
32. Meiri S, Dayan T, Simberloff D. The generality of the island rule reexamined. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1571-1577.
33. Meiri S, Thomas GH. The geography of body size - challenges of the interspecific approach. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:689-693.
34. Meiri S, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E. What determines conformity to Bergmann's rule? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:788-794.
35. Olalla-Tarraga MA, Rodrιguez MA, Hawkins BA. Broad-scale patterns of body size in squamate reptiles of Europe and North America. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:781-793.
36. Olden JD, Hogan ZS, Zanden MJV. Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:694-701.
37. Olson V, Davies RG, Orme CDL, Thomas GH, Meiri S, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Owens IPF, Bennett PM. Global biogeography and ecology of body size in birds. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:249-259.
38. Organ CL, Moreno RG, Edwards SV. Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2008, 48:494-504.
39. Peters HR. The ecological implications of body size 1983, New York, Cambridge University Press
40. Pincheira-Donoso D, Hodgson DJ, Tregenza T. The evolution of body size under environmental gradients in ectotherms: why should Bergmann's rule apply to lizards? BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:68. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2148-8-68.pdf, Available at
41. Pough FH. The advantages of ectothermy for tetrapods. Am. Nat. 1980, 115:92-112.
42. Price TD, Phillimore AB. Reduced major axis regression and the island rule. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1998-1999.
43. Rambaut A. 2009, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, v1.2.2. Author, Edinburgh. Available at, (accessed 10 August 2009)
44. R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2008, R Development Core Team., Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing
45. Rising JD, Somers KM. The measurement of overall body size in birds. Auk 1989, 106:666-674.
46. Rosenzweig ML. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: prediction from climatological data. Am. Nat. 1968, 102:67-74.
47. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling. Why is animal size so important? 1984, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
48. Shine R. Relative clutch mass and body shape in lizards and snakes: is reproductive investment constrained or optimised? Evolution 1992, 46:828-833.
49. Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SKM, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP. Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 2003, 84:3403. http://apps.isiknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode= GeneralSearch&qid=6&SID=V1InAnEacBiO@Bi3I@K&page=5&doc=4 3, Available at
50. Stamps JA, Andrews RM. Estimating asymptotic size using the largest individuals per sample. Oecologia 1992, 92:503-512.
51. Stanley SM. An explanation for Cope's rule. Evolution 1973, 27:1-26.
52. Townsend TM, Larson A, Louis E, Macey JR. Molecular phylogenetics of Squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:735-757.
53. Uetz P, Goll J, Hallermann J. 2009, http://www.reptile-database.org, The JCVI reptile database, Available at, (accessed July 23, 2009)
54. Van Balen JH. The significance of variation in body weight and wing length in the great tit. Ardea 1967, 55:1-59.
55. Vidal N, Hedges SB. The molecular evolutionary tree of lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians. C. R. Biologies 2009, 332:129-139.
56. Vitt LJ, Congdon JD. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. Am. Nat. 1978, 112:595-608.
57. Vitt LJ, Pianka ER. Historical patterns in lizard ecology: what teiids can tell us about lacertids. The biology of lacertid lizards, evolutionary and ecological perspectives 2004, 139-157. Perez-Mellado V, Riera NPerera A. In, (Eds), Recerca, Institut Menorquí d'Estudis
58. Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 2006, 81:259-291.
59. Westoby M, Leishman M, Lord J. On misinterpreting 'phylogenetic correction. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:531-534.
60. White CR, Phillips NF, Seymour RS. The scaling and temperature dependence of vertebrate metabolism. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2:125-127.
61. Wiewandt TA. Adaptations to herbivory in iguanine lizards. Iguanas of the world: their behavior, ecology and conservation 1982, 119-141. Burghardt GMRand AS. In, (Eds), New Jersey, Noyes Publications
62. Zaldivar-Riveron A, de Oca ANM, Manriquez-Moran N, Reeder TW. Phylogenetic affinities of the rare and enigmatic limb-reduced Anelytropsis (Reptilia: Squamata) as inferred with mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequence data. J. Herp. 2008, 42:303-311.
63. Zhou K, Li H, Han D, Bauer AM, Feng J. The complete mitochondrial genome of Gekko gecko (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) and support for the monophyly of Sauria including Amphisbaenia. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 40:887-892.