Biomass production, water use and photosynthesis of Salix clones grown in a wastewater purification system

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 897-905

  Aasamaa, Krõõt ^a   Heinsoo, Katrin ^a   Holm, Bert ^a  

^a ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll; Jmax; Salix; Vegetation filter; Yield defining characteristics

Indexed keywords

ABOVE-GROUND WOODY BIOMASS; BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENTS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTANCE; JMAX; LEAF NITROGEN; LEAF WATER; LEAF WATER POTENTIAL; LIGHT INTENSITY; PARTITIONING COEFFICIENTS; PHOTOSYNTHETIC ELECTRON TRANSPORT; SALIX CLONES; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; VEGETATION FILTER; VERTICAL GRADIENTS; WASTEWATER PURIFICATION; WATER POTENTIAL; WATER RELATIONS; WATER USE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYLL; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; FORESTRY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PORPHYRINS; PURIFICATION; WASTEWATER; WATER CONTENT; WATER SUPPLY;

VEGETATION;

BIOENERGETICS; BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYLL; CLONE; DECIDUOUS TREE; ELECTRON; FILTER; FOLIAGE; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; LIGHT INTENSITY; MORPHOLOGY; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; WASTEWATER; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; YIELD RESPONSE;

SALIX;

EID: 77954861586     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.035     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Rosenqvist H., Aronsson P., Hasselgren K., Perttu K.L. Economics of using municipal wastewater irrigation of willow coppice crops. Biomass and Bioenergy 1997, 12:1-8.
2. Rosenqvist H., Dawson M. Economics of using wastewater irrigation of willow in Northern Ireland. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 29:83-92.
3. Guo J., Jermyn W.A., Turnbull M.H. Diurnal and seasonal photosynthesis in two asparagus cultivars with contrasting yield. Crop Science 2002, 42:399-405.
4. Tuberosa R., Salvi S., Sanguineti M.C., Landi P., MacCaferri M., Conti S. Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. Annals of Botany 2002, 89:941-963.
5. McLaughlin S.B., Kszos L.A. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 28:515-535.
6. Rönnberg-Wästljung A.-C., Gullberg U. Genetics of breeding characters with possible effect on biomass production in Salix viminalis (L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 1999, 98:531-540.
7. Tharakan P.J., Volk T.A., Nowak C.A., Abrahamson L.P. Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2005, 35:421-431.
8. Karp A., Shield I. Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytologist 2008, 179:15-32.
9. Lindegaard K.N., Barker J.H.A. Breeding willows for biomass. Aspects of Applied Biology 1997, 47:155-162.
10. Robinson K.M., Karp A., Taylor G. Defining leaf traits linked to yield in short-rotation coppice Salix. Biomass and Bioenergy 2004, 26:417-431.
11. Weih M. Evidence for increased sensitivity to nutrient and water stress in a fast-growing hybrid willow compared with a natural willow clone. Tree Physiology 2001, 21:1141-1148.
12. Merilo E., Heinsoo K., Kull O., Söderbergh I., Lundmark T., Koppel A. Leaf photosynthetic properties in a willow (Salix viminalis and Salix dasyclados) plantation in response to fertilization. European Journal of Forest Research 2006, 125:93-100.
13. Weih M., Nordh N.-E. Determinants of biomass production in hybrid willows and prediction of field performance from pot studies. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:1197-1206.
14. Cannell M.G.R., Milne R., Sheppard L.J., Unsworth M.H. Radiation interception and productivity of willow. Journal of Applied Ecology 1987, 24:261-278.
15. Bullard M.J., Mustill S.J., Carver P., Nixon P.M.I. Yield improvements through modification of planting density and harvest frequency in short rotation coppice Salix spp.: 2. Resource capture and use in two morphologically diverse varieties. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002, 22:27-39.
16. Wikberg J., Ögren E. Variation in drought resistance, drought acclimation and water conservation in four willow cultivars used for biomass production. Tree Physiology 2007, 27:1339-1346.
17. Cochard H., Casella E., Mencuccini M. Xylem vulnerability to cavitation varies among poplar and willow clones and correlates with yield. Tree Physiology 2007, 27:1761-1767.
18. Jørgensen U., Schelde K. Energy crop water and nutrient use efficiency 2001, Report for the International Energy Agency (IEA) Bioenergy Task 17, short rotation crops, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Tjele.
19. Weih M., Rönnberg-Wästljung A.-C., Glynn C. Genetic basis of phenotypic correlations among growth traits in hybrid willow (Salix dasyclados × S. viminalis) grown under two water regimes. New Phytologist 2006, 170:467-477.
20. Bunn S.M., Rae A.M., Herbert C.S., Taylor G. Leaf-level productivity traits in Populus grown in short rotation coppice for biomass energy. Forestry 2004, 77:307-323.
21. Marron N., Dillen S., Ceulemans R. Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplar hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany 2007, 61:103-116.
22. Nordh N.-E. Long term changes in stand structure and biomass production in short rotation willow coppice 2005, Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
23. Heinsoo K., Sild E., Koppel A. Estimation of shoot biomass productivity in Estonian Salix plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 170:67-74.
24. Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D., et al. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science 1965, 148:339-346.
25. Tyree M.T., Hammel H.T. The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure-bomb technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 1972, 23:267-282.
26. Nardini A., Pitt F. Drought resistance of Quercus pubescens as a function of root hydraulic conductance, xylem embolism and hydraulic architecture. New Phytologist 1999, 143:485-493.
27. Tyree M.T., Salleo S., Nardini A., Lo Gullo M.A., Mosca R. Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel. Do we need a new paradigm?. Plant Physiology 1999, 120:11-21.
28. Salleo S., Raimondo F., Trifilò P., Nardini A. Axial-to-radial water permeability of leaf major veins: a possible determinant of the impact of vein embolism on leaf hydraulics?. Plant Cell and Environment 2003, 26:1749-1758.
29. Aasamaa K., Sõber A., Hartung W., Niinemets Ü Drought acclimation of two deciduous tree species of different layers in a temperate forest canopy. Trees 2004, 18:93-101.
30. Aasamaa K., Sõber A. Seasonal courses of maximum hydraulic conductance in shoots of six temperate deciduous tree species. Functional Plant Biology 2005, 32:1077-1087.
31. Aasamaa K., Niinemets Ü, Sõber A. Leaf hydraulic conductance in relation to anatomical and functional traits during Populus tremula leaf ontogeny. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:1409-1418.
32. Porra R.J., Thompson W.A., Kriedemann P.E. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1989, 975:384-394.
33. 2 assimilation in leaves of C-3 species. Planta 1980, 149:78-90.
34. von Caemmerer S., Farquhar G.D. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 1981, 153:376-387.
35. Harley P.C., Tenhunen J.D., Lange O.L. Use of an analytical model to study limitations on net photosynthesis in Arbutus unedo under field conditions. Oecologia 1986, 70:393-401.
36. 2 concentrations. Global Change Biology 1999, 5:455-470.
37. Bernacchi C.J., Singsaas E.L., Pimentel C., Portis A.R., Long S.P. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell and Environment 2001, 24:253-259.
38. Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen J.D. A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant Cell and Environment 1997, 20:845-866.
39. Niinemets Ü Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies. Plant Cell and Environment 2007, 30:1052-1071.
40. Lindegaard K.N., Parfitt R.I., Donaldson G., Hunter T., Dawson W.M., Forbes E.G.A., et al. Comparative trials of elite Swedish and UK biomass willow varieties. Aspects of Applied Biology 2001, 65:183-192.
41. Heinsoo K., Koppel A. Choice of willow (Salix spp.) clones for establishment under short rotation forest plantations in Estonia. Short rotation forestry for industrial and rural development 2005, Indian Society of Tree Scientists, Solan, p. 53-7. K.S. Verma, D.K. Khurana, L. Christersson (Eds.).
42. Laureysens I., Deraedt W., Indeherberge T., Ceulemans R. Population dynamics in a 6-year old coppice culture of poplar. I. Clonal differences in stool mortality, shoot dynamics and shoot diameter distribution in relation to biomass production. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003, 24:81-95.
43. Elowson S. Willow as a vegetation filter for cleaning of polluted drainage water from agricultural land. Biomass and Bioenergy 1999, 16:281-290.
44. Proe M.F., Craig J., Griffiths J., Wilson A., Reid E. Comparison of biomass production in coppice and single stem woodland management systems on an imperfectly drained gley soil in Central Scotland. Biomass and Bioenergy 1999, 17:141-151.
45. Rae A.M., Pinel M.P.C., Bastien C., Sabatti M., Street N.R., Tucker J., et al. QTL for yield in bioenergy Populus: identifying G×E interactions from growth at three contrasting sites. Tree Genetics and Genomes 2008, 4:97-112.
46. Verwijst T., Elowson S., Li X., Leng G. Production losses due to a summer frost in a Salix viminalis short-rotation forest in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1996, 11:104-110.
47. Tahvanainen L., Rytkönen V.-M. Biomass production of Salix viminalis in southern Finland and the effect of soil properties and climate conditions on its production and survival. Biomass and Bioenergy 1999, 16:103-117.
48. Cambours M.A., Heinsoo K., Granhall U., Nejad P. Frost related dieback in Estonian energy plantations of willows in relation to fertilisation and pathogenic bacteria. Biomass and Bioenergy 2006, 30:220-230.
49. Sacchi C.F., Price P.W. The relative roles of abiotic and biotic factors in seedling demography of arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis: Salicaceae). American Journal of Botany 1992, 79:395-405.
50. Donovan L., Ehleringer J.R. Carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency, growth and mortality in a natural shrub population. Oecologia 1994, 100:347-354.
51. Lieffers V.J., Landhäusser S.M., Hogg E.H. Is the wide distribution of aspen a result of its stress tolerance? USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-18. Sustaining aspen in western landscapes 2001, 311-323. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins. W.D. Sheppard, D. Binkley, D.L. Bartos, T.J. Stohlgren, L.G. Eskew (Eds.).
52. Lindroth A., Cienciala E. Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. Tree Physiology 1996, 16:257-262.
53. Martin P.J., Stephens W. Willow growth in response to nutrients and moisture on a clay landfill cap soil. II: water use. Bioresource Technology 2006, 97:449-458.
54. Lindroth A., Bath A. Assessment of regional willow coppice yield in Sweden on basis of water availability. Forest Ecology and Management 1999, 121:57-65.
55. Ceulemans R., Impens I., Hebrant F., Moermans R. Evaluation of field productivity for several Poplar clones based on their gas exchange variables determined under laboratory conditions. Photosynthetica 1980, 14:355-362.
56. Monclus R., Dreyer E., Villar M., Delmotte F.M., Delay D., Petit J.-M., et al. Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × P. nigra. New Phytologist 2006, 169:765-777.
57. Dillen S.Y., Marron N., Koch B., Ceulemans R. Genetic variation of stomatal traits and carbon isotope discrimination in two hybrid poplar families (Populus deltoides 'S9-2' × P. nigra 'Ghoy' and P. deltoides 'S9-2' × P. trichocarpa 'V24'). Annals of Botany 2008, 102:399-407.
58. Monclus R., Dreyer E., Delmotte F.M., Villar M., Delay D., Boudouresque E., et al. Productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 Populus deltoides × P. nigra clones. New Phytologist 2005, 167:53-62.
59. 2experiment and eddy-flux data. Ecological Applications 2001, 11:239-252.
60. Lai C.-T., Katul G.G., Butnor J., Siqueira M., Ellsworth D.S., Maier C.A., et al. Modelling the limits on the response of net carbon exchange to fertilization in a south-eastern pine forest. Plant, Cell and Environment 2002, 25:1095-1119.
61. Manter D.K., Kavanagh K.L., Rose C.L. Growth response of Douglas-fir seedlings to nitrogen fertilization: importance of Rubisco activation state and respiration rates. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:1015-1021.
62. Poulter B., Heyder U., Cramer W. Modelling the sensitivity of seasonal gross primary productivity to water and light limitations along a tropical forest moisture gradient. Geophysical Research Abstracts 2008, 10. EGU2008-A-06267.
63. 2 exchange of oak-maple forests: influence of ozone, nitrogen and other factors on simulated canopy carbon gain. Tree Physiology 1990, 7:329-345.
64. Wu R.-L. Simulated optimal structure of a photosynthetic system: implication for the breeding of forest crop ideotype. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1993, 23:1631-1638.
65. Hikosaka K. Leaf canopy as a dynamic system: ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover. Annals of Botany 2005, 95:521-533.
66. Weih M., Rönnberg-Wästjung A.-C. Shoot biomass growth is related to the vertical leaf nitrogen gradient in Salix canopies. Tree Physiology 2007, 27:1551-1559.