Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 339-350

  Boman, I L ^a,b   Bartfai, A ^a   Borell, L ^b   Tham, K ^b   Hemmingsson, H ^b  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; cognitive impairment; cognitive rehabilitation; home environment; single subject design

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION AID; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF EVALUATION; STATISTICS;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77954858657     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483100903131777     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Fish J, Manly T, Emslie H, Evans J, Wilson B. Compensatory strategies for acquired disorders of memory and planning: Differential effects of a paging system for patients with brain injury of traumatic versus cerebrovascular aetiology. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatr 2007;26:2-13.
2. Inglis EA, Szymkowiak A, Gregor P, Newell AF, Hine N, Wilson BA, Evans J, Shah P. Usable technology? Challenges in designing a memory aid with current electronic devices. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:77-87.
3. Fleming JM, Schum D, Strong J, Lightbody S. Prospective memory rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: A compensatory training programme. Brain Inj 2005; 19:1-10.
4. Ellis J, Kvavilashvili L. Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present, and future directions. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000; 14:1-9.
5. Gorman P, Dayle R, Hood CA, Rumrell L. Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. Neurorehabilitation 2003;18:57-67.
6. Hart T, Buchhofer BS, Vaccaro M. Portable electronic devices as memory and organisational aids after traumatic brain injury: A consumer survey study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;8:351-365.
7. Stapeleton S, Adams M, Atterton L. A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation. Brain Inj 2007;21:401-411.
8. Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowd MM, Robinson Boone KA, Park GJ. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: Follow-up findings. Brain Inj 2000;14:187-196.
9. Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, Rossi B, Stenhammar B, van Heugten CM. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2005;12: 665-680.
10. Van den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Inj 2000;14:455-462.
11. Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatr 2001;70:477-482.
12. Caprani N, Greaney J, Proter N. A review of memory aid devices for an ageing population. Psycho Neurol J 2006; 4:205-243.
13. Pollack M. Autominder: A case study of assistive technology for elders with cognitive impairment. Am Soc Aging 2006; 30:67-69.
14. Boman IL, Lindberg Stenvall C, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. A training apartment with a set of electronic memory aids for persons with cognitive impairments Scandinavian. J Occup Ther 2009;22:1-9.
15. Lindberg C, Bartfai A, Granqvist A, Söderström M. Facile system demonstration report 2000. Deliverable No:6.4.
16. Kazdin AE. Research design in clinical psychology. 4th ed, Boston: Alyn & Bacon; 2003.
17. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead behavioural memory test. 2nd ed. Bury St Edmunds, UK, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
18. Heaton R, Chelune G, Talley J, Kay G, Curtiss G. Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB; 1993.
19. Ruff R, Allen C. The ruff 2 and 7 selective attention test manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB; 1996.
20. WAIS-III. Manual. Cleveland: Psychological Corporation; 2003.
21. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Canadian occupational performance measure. 4th ed, Toronto, ON: Publications ACE; 2002.
22. Cook A, Hussey S. Assistive technologies and practice. 2nd ed, Missouri: Mosby; 2002.
23. AhlsiöB, Britton M, Murray V, Theorell T. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1984;15:886-890.
24. Fughl-Meyer AR, Bränholm IB, Fughl-Meyer KS. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clinical Rehabil 1991;5:25-33.
25. Wills P, Clare L, Shields A, Wilson BA. Assessing subtle memory impairments in the everyday memory performance of brain injury people: Exploring the potential of the extended Rivermead behavioural memory test. Brain Inj 2000;14: 693-704.
26. Ottenbacher KJ. Evaluating clinical change: Strategies for occupational and physical therapists, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986.
27. Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative methods for international public health, Umea University, Umea: Print and Media; 2007.
28. Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, Nochajski SM, Wu YW. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil 2007;2:235-248.
29. Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:1-8.
30. Scherer M, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer M. Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27:1321-1331.
31. Boman IL, Tham K, Granqvist A, Bartfai A, Hemmingsson H. Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired injury: A study of the learning process and the usability. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:23-33.
32. Gartland D. Considerations in the selection and use of technology with people who have cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004; 14:61-75.
33. Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. Br Med J 2002; 324:1193-1194.
34. Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, Bodisch Lynch K. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: A community-based trail. Brain Inj 2008;22:19-24.
35. Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Public Health 1997;87:384-392.
36. Lenker JA, Paquet V. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003;15:1-15.
37. Kapur N, Gliskey E, Wilson BA. Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004; 14:41-60.
38. Emslie H, Wilson BA, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Watson P. Using a paging system in the rehabilitation of encephalitic patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2007;17:567-581.