In vitro response of promising tomato genotypes for tolerance to osmotic stress

African Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 9, Issue 26, 2010, Pages 4014-4017

  Aazami, M A ^a   Torabi, M ^b   Jalili, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARAGHEH   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MOHAGHEGH ARDABILI   (Iran)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Callus; Drought; Polyethylene glycol; Tomato

Indexed keywords

MACROGOL 6000; PROLINE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP IMPROVEMENT; CULTIVAR; CULTURE MEDIUM; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; DRY MASS; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; PLANT OSMOTIC POTENTIAL; PLANT REGENERATION; PROTEIN CONTENT; SHOOT GROWTH; TOMATO; WATER STRESS;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 77954852401     PISSN: 16845315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bajji M, Lutts S, Kinet JM (2000). Physiological change after exposure to and recovery from polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit in callus culture inssued from durum wheat (Triticum durum) cultivars differing in drought resistance. J. Plant Physiol. 156: 75-83.
2. Barakt MN, Abdel-Latif TH (1995 b). In vitro selection for drought tolerant lines in wheat I. Effects of PEG on the embryonic cultures. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 40: 97-112.
3. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 39: 205-207.
4. Binh DQ, Heszky LE, Gyulai G, Gsillag A (1992). Plant regeneration of NaCl pretreated cells from longterm suspension culture of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in high saline conditions. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 29: 75-82.
5. Cano EA, Perez A, Moreno V, Bolarin M (1996). Responses to NaCl stress of cultivated and wild tomato species and their hybrids in callus cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 15(10): 791-794.
6. Chandler SF, Thorpe TA (1989). Variation from plant tissue cultures: biotechnological application to improving salinity tolerance. Biotech. Advs. 4: 117-135.
7. Crusciol CAC, Pulz AL, Lemos LB, Soratto RP, Lima GPP (2009). Effects of silicon and drought stress on tuber yield and leaf biochemical characteristics in potato. Crop Sci. 49: 949-954.
8. Danson JW, Lagat M, Mbogori M (2006). Screening tropical maize lines for the production and regeneration of friable and embryogenic type II Callus. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5(23): 2367-2370.
9. Errabii M, Gandonou CB, Essalmani H, Abrini J, Idaomar M, Skali-Senhaji N (2006). Growth, proline and ion accumulation in sugarcane callus cultures under drought-induced osmotic stress and its subsequent relief. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5 (16): 1488-1493.
10. Gopal J, Iwama K (2007). In vitro screening of potato against water stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Rep. 26: 693-700.
11. Kulkarni M, Deshpande U (2007). In vitro screening of tomato genotypes for drought resistance using polyethylene glycol. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5(16): 1488-1493.
12. Larher F, Leport L, Petrivalsky M, Chappart M (1993). Effectors for the osmoinduced proline response in higher plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 31(6): 911-922.
13. Mansour MMF (2000). Nitrogen containing compounds and adaptation of plants to salinity stress. Biol. Plant. 43: 491-500.
14. Mohamed M, Tawfik A (2006). Dehydration-induced alterations in growth and osmotic potential of callus from six tepary bean lines varying in drought resistance. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 87(3): 255-262.
15. Mohamed MAH, Harris PJC, Henderson J (2000). In vitro selection and characterization of a drought tolerant clone of tagetes minuta. Plant Sci. 159: 213-222.
16. Murashig T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.
17. Noaman SH, Lamis DS, El-Sayed Ah, Eman ES (2004). In vitro selection for water stress tolerant callus line of Helianthus annus L. Cv. Myak. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6(1): 13-18.
18. Purushotham MG, Patil V, Raddey PC, Prasad TG, Vajranabhaiah SN (1998). Development of in vitro PEG stress tolerant cell lines in two groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 3: 49-51.
19. Rus-Alvarez A, Guerrier G (1994). Proline metabolic pathways in calli from Lycopersicon esculentum and L. Pennellii under salt stress. Biol. Plantarum. 36: 277-284.
20. Sakthivelu G, Akitha Devi MK, Giridhar P, Rajasekaran T, Ravishankar GA, Nedev T, Kosturkova G (2008). Drought-induced alterations in growth, osmotic potential and in vitro regeneration of soybean cultivars. Genet. Appl. Plant Physiol. 34(1-2):103-112.
21. Singh AK, Sharma DR (2008). In vitro screening and regeneration of water stress tolerant culture of tomato. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 13(1): 23-28.
22. Tewary PK, Sharma A, Raghunath MK, Sarkar A (2000). In vitro response of promising mulberry (Morus sp.) genotypes for tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses. Plant Growth Regul. 30: 17-21.