Supporting Workforce Development of Nurses- Exploiting the Synergies Between Technology In Education And Practice

Health Care and Informatics Review Online

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Honey, Michelle ^a   North, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954849186     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11764201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hancock C. The 21st century: Nursing's window of opportunity. 2003 [cited 2005 March 14]; Available from: http://www.icn.ch/ns/president_message.htm
2. Davey JA, Gee S. Life at 85 plus: A statistical review. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Institute for Research on Ageing 2002.
3. Ministry of Health. The health and independence report. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2001.
4. Nursing and Midwifery Workforce Strategy Group. Nursing workforce strategy. Wellington, New Zealand: DHBNZ: District Health Boards New Zealand 2006.
5. Brown JS. Growing up digital. Change. 2000;March/April:10-20.
6. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Quality of Healthcare in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2001.
7. Conrick M, ed. Health informatics: Transforming healthcare with technology. Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Social Science Press 2006.
8. Simpson RL. Coherent heterogeneity: Redefining nursing in a consumer-smart world. In: Hyeoun-Ae Park, Peter Murray, Connie Delaney, eds. Consumer-centered computer-supported care for healthy people, Proceedings of The 9th International Congress on Nursing Informatics (NI2006). Seoul, South Korea. 9-14 June. Amsterdam: IOS Press 2006:3-8.
9. Tanner A, Pierce S, Pravikoff D. Moving the nursing information agenda forward. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2004 Sep-Oct;22(5):300-2.
10. KPMG Consulting, Nursing Council of New Zealand. KPMG strategic review of undergraduate nursing education: Final report to the Nursing Council of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Nursing Council of New Zealand; 2001.
11. Ehnfors M, Ehrenberg A, Rolf N. International perspectives: Nursing Informatics in Europe. In: Saba VK, McCormick KA, eds. Essentials of Nursing Informatics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2006:621-8.
12. Marin HF. International perspectives: Nursing informatics in South America. In: Saba VK, McCormick KA, eds. Essentials of Nursing Informatics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2006:663-7.
13. Park H. International perspectives: Nursing informatics in Asia. In: Saba VK, McCormick KA, eds. Essentials of Nursing Informatics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2006:647-62.
14. Carty B, Phillip E. The nursing curriculum in the information age. In: Saba VK, McCormick KA, eds. Essentials of computers for nurses: Informatics for the new millennium. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 2001:393-412.
15. Bowies KH. The barriers and benefits of nursing information systems. Computers in Nursing. 1997;15(4):191-6.
16. Schwirian PM. Professionalization of nursing. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1998.
17. Strachan H, Hoy D, Moen A, Park HA, Virginia S, Skiba DJ. Critical pathways and outcomes - using evidence based practice in community and home health care. In: McArthur J, Carr R, Westbrooke L, Honey M, Bakken S, eds. Proceedings of the NI2000 Post Congress Workshop. Auckland, New Zealand: NI2000 2001:96-9.
18. Honey M. Teaching and learning with technology as enabler: A case study on flexible learning for postgraduate nurses [doctoral thesis]. Auckland, New Zealand University of Auckland; 2007.
19. Billings DM, Connors HR, Skiba DJ. Benchmarking best practices in web-based nursing courses. Advances in Nursing Science. 2001;23(3):41-52.
20. Burbules NC, Callister TA. Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press 2000.
21. McGuiness B, Hardy J. Learning through technology. In: Higgs J, Edwards H, eds. Educating Beginning Practitioners: Challenges for Health Professional Education. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann 1999:212-8.
22. Everhart RL. Satisfying student expectations: Connected learning environments. The Technology Source. 2001;March/April.
23. DeBourgh GA. Simple elegance: Course management systems as pedagogical infrastructure to enhance science learning. The Technology Source. 2002;May/June:Retrieved 06/9/2002 from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=925.
24. Cole IJ, Kelsey A. Computer and information literacy in post qualifying education. Nurse Education in Practice. 2004;4(3):190-9.
25. Koerner JG. The virtues of the virtual world: Enhancing the technology/knowledge professional interface for lifelong learning. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2003;27(1):9-17.
26. George R, Luke R. The critical place of information literacy in the trend towards flexible delivery in higher education contexts. Learning for Life Conference; 1995 November 30-December 1; Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved July 17, 2005 from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/flex.learning/rigmor_fr.html; 1995.
27. Grabinger RS, Dunlap JC. Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J). 1995;3(2):5-34.
28. Freeman LH, Voignier RR, Scott DL. New curriculum for a new century: Beyond repackaging. Journal of Nursing Education. 2002;41(1):38-40.
29. Whyte DA, Lugton J, Fawcett TN. Fit for purpose: The relevance of masters preparation for the professional practice of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2000;31(5):1072-80.
30. Higgs J, Edwards H, eds. Educating beginning practitioners: Challenges for health professional education. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann 1999.
31. Hoyt KS. Validating nursing with " NANDA, NIC, and NOC" Journal of Emergency Nursing. 1997;23(6):507 - 9.