Microscopic route to nematicity in Sr3 Ru2 O7

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Puetter, Christoph M ^a   Rau, Jeffrey G ^a   Kee, Hae Young ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b Korea Institute for Advanced Study   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954837097     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081105     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S. A. Kivelson, Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998). 10.1038/31177
2. R. A. Borzi, Science 315, 214 (2007). 10.1126/science.1134796
3. S. A. Grigera, Science 306, 1154 (2004). 10.1126/science.1104306
4. V. Oganesyan, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195109 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.195109
5. H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 68, 245109 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.245109
6. I. Khavkine, Phys. Rev. B 70, 184521 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.184521
7. H.-Y. Kee and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 71, 184402 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.184402
8. H. Doh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126407 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.126407
9. C. Puetter, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235112 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.235112
10. S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214402 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.214402
11. W.-C. Lee and C. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 80, 104438 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80. 104438
12. A. Tamai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026407 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101. 026407
13. C. Bergemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2662 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84. 2662
14. K. M. Shen, Phys. Rev. B 64, 180502 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64. 180502
15. H. Shaked, J. Solid State Chem. 154, 361 (2000). 10.1006/jssc.2000.8796
16. The rotation of RuO octahedra has also been considered in M. Fischer and M. Sigrist, arXiv:0909.5392 (unpublished).
17. K. K. Ng and M. Sigrist, Europhys. Lett. 49, 473 (2000). 10.1209/epl/i2000-00173-x
18. The actual values of the mixing parameters near the γ 2 saddle points are larger due to a stronger d x y admixture (thus effectively enhancing V n and V nsn). However, this only changes quantitative details such as the location of the phase boundary in Fig..
19. Considering the FS structure another competing order is a spin-density-wave (SDW) state, which breaks the translational and spin-rotational symmetry. However, it was explicitly shown in Ref. that SDW order is suppressed by SO coupling. This is consistent with our intuition as the spin is no longer a good quantum number in the presence of SO coupling.
20. M. N. Iliev, Physica B 358, 138 (2005). 10.1016/j.physb.2004.12.069
21. K. Iwata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 104716 (2008). 10.1143/JPSJ.77.104716
22. Y. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. B 72, 054412 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.054412
23. A. W. Rost, Science 325, 1360 (2009). 10.1126/science.1176627
24. J. Baier, J. Low Temp. Phys. 147, 405 (2007). 10.1007/s10909-007-9330-0
25. P. Steffens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 217402 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99. 217402
26. R. S. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2661 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86. 2661
27. L. Capogna, Phys. Rev. B 67, 012504 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.012504
28. H. Doh and H. Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 75, 233102 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.233102
29. J. Lee, Nat. Phys. 5, 800 (2009). 10.1038/nphys1397
30. J. Mercure, arXiv:0909.1215 (unpublished).