Mobile phone masts, social rationalities and risk: Negotiating lay perspectives on technological hazards

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 621-637

  Collins, Jeremy W ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

mobile phones; public fears; risk perception; scientific rationality; social rationality

Indexed keywords

FOCUS GROUPS; INFORMATION SOURCES; MEDIA REPRESENTATION; RISK COMPARISON; RISK JUDGEMENTS; RISK RESPONSE; RISK SCENARIOS; SOCIAL RATIONALITY; TECHNOLOGICAL HAZARDS;

MOBILE DEVICES; MOBILE PHONES; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; PUBLIC RISKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS;

HEALTH RISKS;

EID: 77954833971     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870903305911     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams, J. 1995. Risk. London: UCL Press.
2. BBC News. 2004, March 31. Concern over asthma inhaler drug. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ health/3561783.stm (accessed October 16, 2007).
3. -. 2007, November 9. Vioxx settlement to total $4.85bn. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ business/7087348.stm (accessed January 15, 2008).
4. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
5. -. 1996. Risk society and the provident state. In Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, ed. S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 27-43. London: Sage.
6. Brown, P. 1992. Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33: 267-281
7. Burgess, A. 2004. Cellular phones, public fears, and a culture of precaution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Critcher, C. 2003. Moral panics and the media. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Douglas, M. 1986. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. London: Routledge/ Kegan Paul.
10. Durodie, B. 2004. Cellular phones, public fears, and a culture of precaution. Review of Risk Analysis, by A. Burgess, 24: 1066-1068
11. Frankel, S., C. Davison, and G.D. Smith. 1991. Lay epidemiology and the rationality of responses to health education. British Journal of General Practice 41: 428-430
12. Goethals, C., S.C. Ratzan, and V. Demko. 1998. The politics of BSE: Negotiating the public's health. In The mad cow crisis: Health and the public good, ed. S.C. Ratzan, 95-110. London: UCL Press.
13. Guillaume, L.R., and P.A. Bath. 2004. The impact of health scares on parents' information needs and preferred information sources: A case study of the MMR vaccine scare. Health Informatics Journal 10, no.1: 5-22.
14. Haggerty, K.D. 2003. From risk to precaution: The rationalities of personal crime prevention. In Risk and morality, ed. R.V. Ericson and A. Doyle, 193-214. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
15. Hansen A., S. Cottle, R. Negrine, and C. Newbold, eds. 1998. Mass communication research methods. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
16. Hobson-West, P. 2003. Understanding vaccination resistance. Health Risk and Society 5: 273-283
17. Hornig, S. 1993. Reading risk: Public response to print media accounts of technological risk. Public Understanding of Science 2: 95-109.
18. IEGMP. 2000. Mobile phones and health. Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones. http://www.iegmp.org.uk/report/text.htm (accessed January 29, 2007).
19. Jackson, S., and S. Scott. 1999. Risk anxiety and the social construction of childhood. In Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives, ed. D. Lupton, 86-107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Joffe, H. 2003. Risk: From perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology 42: 55-73.
21. Kitzinger, J., and J. Reilly. 1997. The rise and fall of risk reporting: Media coverage of human genetics research, 'false memory syndrome' and 'mad cow disease'. European Journal of Communication 12: 319-350
22. Lang, T. 1998. BSE and CJD: Recent developments. In The mad cow crisis: Health and the public good, ed. S.C. Ratzan, 65-85. London: UCL Press.
23. Lupton, D. 1999. Introduction: Risk and sociocultural theory. In Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives, ed. D. Lupton, 1-11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Manning, P. 2001. News and news sources: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
25. Palmer, J. 2000. Spinning into control. London: Leicester University Press.
26. Perrow, C. 1999. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. 2nd ed. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
27. Petts, J., T. Horlick-Jones, and G. Murdock. 2001. Social amplification of risk: The media and the public. HSE Contract Research Report 329/2001. Sudbury: HSE Books.
28. Petts, J., and S. Niemeyer. 2004. Health risk communication and amplification: Learning from the MMR vaccination controversy. Health, Risk and Society 6: 7-23.
29. Prynn, J. 2004. Phone mast plague. London Evening Standard, November 11.
30. Reilly, J. 1999. Just another food scare? Public understanding and the BSE crisis. In Message received, ed. G. Philo, 128-145 Harlow: Longman.
31. Siegrist, M., T.C. Earle, H. Gutscher, and C. Keller. 2005. Perception of mobile phone and base station risks. Risk Analysis 25: 1253-1264
32. Slovic, P. 2000. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
33. Stilgoe, J. 2001. The media and the construction of post-normal risk: The health effects of mobile phones, PREST Discussion Paper Series 01-06. http://www.mbs.ac.uk/research/engineeringpolicy/ publications/documents/ PRESTDP01-06.pdf (accessed February 9, 2007).
34. -. 2005. Controlling mobile phone health risks in the UK: A fragile discourse of compliance. Science and Public Policy 32: 35-64.
35. Timotijevic, L., and J. Barnett. 2006. Managing the possible health risks of mobile telecommunications: Public understandings of precautionary action and advice. Health, Risk and Society 8: 143-164
36. Tulloch, J., and D. Lupton. 2001. Risk, the mass media and personal biography: Revisiting Beck's 'knowledge, media and information society'. European Journal of Cultural Studies 4: 5-27.
37. Wiedemann, P.M., and H. Schutz. 2005. The precautionary principle and risk perception: Experimental studies in the EMF area. Environmental Health Perspectives 113, no.41: 402-405 (Pubitemid 40601816)
38. Wiedemann, P.M., A.T. Thalmann, M.A. Grutsch, and H. Schutz. 2006. The impacts of precautionary measures and the disclosure of scientific uncertainty on EMF risk perception and trust. Journal of Risk Research 9, no.4: 361-372
39. Wilde, G.J.S. 1994. Target risk: Dealing with the danger of death, disease and damage in everyday decisions. Toronto: PDE.
40. Woolgar, S., and D. Pawluch. 1985. Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems 32, no.3: 214-227
41. Wynne, B. 1996. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology, ed. S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 44-83. London: Sage.
42. Yapp, R. 2004. A phone mast by every school. Daily Mail, November 13.