The optimization of energy systems under changing policies of greenhouse-gas emission control-A study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada

Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 1587-1602

  Lin, Q G ^a   Huang, G H ^a   Bass, B ^b   Huang, Y F ^c   Liu, L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

climate change; energy model; energy system planning; greenhouse gas; Kyoto protocol; optimization

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY; DEVELOPED MODEL; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY INDUSTRY; ENERGY MODEL; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; KYOTO TARGET; LEAST-COST STRATEGY; MODELING RESULTS; NUCLEAR POWER; SASKATCHEWAN; SASKATCHEWAN , CANADA;

CLIMATE MODELS; EMISSION CONTROL; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

GAS EMISSIONS;

EID: 77954830814     PISSN: 15567036     EISSN: 15567230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15567030902756121     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fishbone, L. G., and Abilock, H. 1981. MARKAL a linear programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the BNL version. Int. J. Energy Res. 5:353-375.
2. Kwaczek, A., Baker-Stariha, B. D., Macrae, K. M., and Reinsch, A. E. 1996.Modeling air emission control strategies for Saskatchewan. Alberta, Canada: Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI).
3. Lin, Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2010a. Interval-fuzzy stochastic optimization for regional energy systems planning and greenhouse-gas emission management under Uncertainty-A case study for the Province of Ontario, Canada. Climatic Change. DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9795-8
4. Lin, Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2010b. An inexact two-stage stochastic optimization model for managing greenhouse gas emission and sustainable energy systems development at a municipal level. Energy. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01. 042
5. Lin, Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2010c. An inexact community-scale energy systems planning model. J. Urban Plann. & Dev. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000017
6. Lin Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2009a. A dynamic inexact energy systems planning model for supporting greenhouse-gas emission management and sustainable renewable energy. Renew. & Sustain. Energy Rev. 13:1836-1853.
7. Lin, Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2009b. Planning of energy system management and GHG-emission control in the municipality of Beijing-An inexact-dynamic stochastic programming model. Energy Policy 37:4463-4473.
8. Lin, Q. G., Huang, G. H., Bass, B., and Qin, X. S. 2009. IFTEM: An interval-fuzzy two-stage stochastic optimization model for regional energy systems planning under uncertainty. Energy Policy 37:868-878.
9. Lin, Q. G., and Huang, G. H. 2008. IPEM: An interval-parameter energy systems planning model. Energy Sources, Part A 30:1382-1399.
10. Lin, Q. G., Huang, G. H., Bass, B., Chen, B., Zhang, B. Y., and Zhang, X. D. 2008. CCEM: A city-cluster energy systems planning model. Energy Sources, Part A 31:1-14.
11. Loulou, R., and Kanudia, A. 1999a. The Kyoto protocol, inter-provincial cooperation, and energy trading: A systems analysis with integrated MARKAL models. Energy Stud. Rev. 9:1-23.
12. Loulou, R., and Kanudia, A. 1999b. Minimax regret strategies for greenhouse gas abatement: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. Lett. 25:219-230.
13. Loulou, R., Kanudia, A., and Lavigne, D. 1998. GHG abatement in central Canada with interprovincial cooperation. Energy Stud. Rev. 8:120-129.
14. Thomassin, P. J., 2002. Macroeconomic impacts of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian agriculture. Am. J. Alterna. Agri. 17:149-157.
15. Yoshida, Y., Kikushige, T., Matsuhashi, R., and Nomura, Y. 2009. Consumer p for smalllot greenhouse gas emission credits attached to automobile insurance. J. Environ. Inform. 14:25-30.
16. Yoshida, Y., and Matsuhashi, R. 2009. Evaluation of CO2 emission reduction in Japan utilizing the interregional repercussion model on freight transportation. J. Environ. Inform. 14:41-50.