Developing a tool for environmental impact assessment and eco-design for ships

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment

Volumn 224, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 207-224

  Princaud M ^a   Cornier, A ^a   Froelich D ^a  

^a ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

design; eco design; eco design tools; impact assessment; life cycle assessment; marine environment; ship

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS; BUREAU VERITAS; COMPUTER ENGINEERS; DESIGN STAGE; ECODESIGN; IFREMER; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; KEY TRENDS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARITIME ENVIRONMENT; TOOL REQUIREMENTS; ECO-DESIGN TOOLS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA);

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; LIFE CYCLE; SHIPS; ECODESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 77954830282     PISSN: 14750902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/14750902JEME185     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lagerstedt, J. Functional and environmental factors in early phases of product development - Eco functional matrix. PhD Thesis, Trita-MMK, 2003.
2. International Maritime Organization. Guidelines for the development of the ship recycling plan. MEPC/Circ.419, 12 November 2004.
3. World Summit on Sustainable Development. Report of the world summit of sustainable development. Plan of implementation of World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August-4 September, 2002.
4. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14040: 2006 (AFNOR) environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework, 2006 (ISO, Geneva).
5. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14044: 2006 (AFNOR) environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines, 2006 (ISO, Geneva).
6. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14062: 2002 (AFNOR) environmental management - integrating environmental aspects into product design and development, 2002 (ISO, Geneva).
7. Le Pochat, S. Intégration de l'éco-conception dans les PME: proposition d'une méthode d'appropriation de savoir-faire pour la conception environnementale des produits. PhD Thesis, ENSAM, Chambe ́ry, 2005.
8. Singh, R. J., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., and Dikshit, A. K. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicator, 2009, 9(2), 189-221.
9. Janin, M. Démarche d'éco-conception en entreprise. Un enjeu: construire la cohérence entre outils et processus. PhD Thesis, ENSAM, Chambéry, 2000.
10. Boeglin, N. and Veuillet, D. Introduction à l'analyse de cycle de vie (ACV). Département Ecoconception and Consommation Durable/Direction Clients, Note de synthèse externe, May 2005.
11. US Environmental Protection Agency and Science Applications International Corporation. Introduction to LCA. LCAccess - LCA 101, 2001.
12. Goedkoop, M. SimaPro 7 - introduction into LCA, vol.4.2, February 2008 (Pré Consultants).
13. Goedkoop, M. and Spriensma, R. The Eco-indicator 99 - a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment - methodology annex, 3rd edition, 22 June 2001 (Pré Consultants).
14. Millet, D., Bistagnino, L., Lanzavecchia, C., Camous, R., and Poldma, T. Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? J. Cleaner Prod., 2007, 15(4), 335-346.
15. Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., and Bras, B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment Part 1: goal and scope and inventory analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assessment, 2008, 13, 290-300. DOI 10.1007/s11367-008-0008- x.
16. Winnes, H. and Ulfvarson, A. Environmental improvements in ship design by the use of scoring functions. Proc. IMechE, Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2006, 220(1), 29-39. DOI 10.1243/14750902JEME30. (Pubitemid 46478161)
17. Assemblee Nationale. Convention internationale pour le contröle et la gestion des eaux de ballast et sédiments des navires. Constitution du 4 Octobre 1958, Treizième Législature Enregistré à la Pré- sidence de l'Assemblée Nationale JO n 119 du 23 May 2008, 8 April 2008.
18. Lloyd's. New openings quantifying opportunities in Asia. Lloyd's report, London, 2000.
19. Fagnent, M. and Marcade, J. Développement d'outils d'éco-conception pour les navires militaires civils. Rapport de Stage, ENSAM, Chambéry, June 2008.
20. Hermann, B. G., Kroeze, C., and Jawjit, W. Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performances indicators. J. Cleaner Prod., 2007, 15(18), 1787-1796.
21. Harscoet, E. and Froelich, D. Use of LCA to evaluate the environmental benefits of substituting chromic acid anodizing (CAA) J. Cleaner Prod., 2007, 16(12), 1294-1305.
22. Dreyer, L., Niemann, A., and Hauschild, M. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99: does it matter which one you choose? Int. J. LCA, 2003, 8(4), 191-200.
23. Huijbregs, M. Priority assessment of toxic substances in the frame of LCA. Development and application of the multimedia fate, exposure and effect model USES-LCA. Milieukunde, University of Amsterdam, May 1999.
24. Brandes, L. J., Den Hollander, H., and Van De Meent, D., SimpleBox 2.0: a nested multimedia fate model for evaluating the environmental fate of chemicals. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, RIVM report no. 719101029, December 1996.
25. Smeets, E. and Weterings, R. Environmental indicators typology and overview, 1999 (European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark).
26. OECD. Towards sustainable development: environmental indicators, 1998 (OECD Publishing, Paris).
27. Michel, J. and Hayes, M. O. Sensitivity of coastal environments and wildlife to spilled oil: Hudson River BIRDS (Bird Polygons), 2005 (Office of Response and Restoration, NOAA's National Ocean Service).