Prevalence of first-pass myocardial perfusion defects detected by contrast-enhanced dual-source CT in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1607-1614

  Schepis, Tiziano ^a   Achenbach, Stephan ^a   Marwan, Mohamed ^a   Muschiol, Gerd ^a   Ropers, Dieter ^a   Daniel, Werner G ^a   Pflederer, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acute coronary syndrome; Angina; Dual source CT; Myocardial infarction; Myocardial necrosis; Myocardial perfusion; Perfusion defect; Unstable

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IOMEPROL; METOPROLOL; TROPONIN I; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; CARDIOVASCULAR ABNORMALITIES; CLINICAL TRIAL; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOVASCULAR ABNORMALITIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PAIN; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77954824614     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1725-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Achenbach S (2006) Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1919-1928
2. Achenbach S (2007) Cardiac CT: state of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 1:3-20
3. Blankstein R, Okada DR, Rocha-Filho JA et al (2009) Cardiac myocardial perfusion imaging using dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:209-216
4. Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M et al (2006) Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 98:303-308
5. Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M et al (2008) Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247:49-56
6. Rubinshtein R, Miller TD, Williamson EE et al (2009) Detection of myocardial infarction by dual-source coronary computer tomography angiography using quantitated myocardial scintigraphy as the reference standard. Heart 95:1419-1422
7. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Klumpp B et al (2007) Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 17(11):2948-2956
8. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114:2251-2260
9. Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113:394-404
10. Mancini GB, Peck WW, Slutksy RA et al (1984) Use of computerized tomography to assess myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in dogs during acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Am J Cardiol 53:282-289
11. Park JM, Choe YH, Chang S et al (2004) Usefulness of multidetector-row CT in the evaluation of reperfused myocardial infarction in a rabbit model. Korean J Radiol 5:19-24
12. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al (2006) Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 113:823-833
13. Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T et al (2005) Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with twophase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 235:804-811
14. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:2042-2047 (Pubitemid 40814129)
15. Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C et al (2004) Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 231:697-701
16. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA et al (1996) Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 94:3318-3326
17. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 116:e148-e304
18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539-542
19. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:863-871
20. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation 115:1762-1768 (Pubitemid 46648613)
21. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072-1084
22. Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 248:466-475
23. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:153-160
24. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Dibbets- Schneider P et al (2008) Comparison of multislice computed tomography to gated single-photon emission computed tomography for imaging of healed myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 101:144-148
25. Nikolaou K, Sanz J, PoonMet al (2005) Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 15:864-871
26. Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD et al (2006) Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:144-152
27. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ et al (2008) Dual-energy CT of the heartprinciples and protocols. Eur J Radiol 68:423-433