Bioremediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soil/sludge: Experimental studies and development of a management model

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 160, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 556-564

  Jeyasingh, J ^a   Somasundaram, V ^a   Philip, Ligy ^a   Bhallamudi, S Murty ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Biokinetic parameters; Bioremediation; Contaminated soil; Hexavalent chromium; Management model

Indexed keywords

BIOKINETIC PARAMETERS; BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS; CONTAMINATED SITES; CONTAMINATED SOILS; COST MINIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM; LEACHABILITY; MANAGEMENT MODEL; MATLAB TOOLS; MOISTURE CONTENTS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; PARETO-OPTIMAL FRONT; SIMULATION OPTIMIZATION; SINGLE OBJECTIVE; TOTAL CHROMIUM; TRADE OFF;

BEARINGS (STRUCTURAL); BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTAMINATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; MANAGEMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 77954815507     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.067     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shashidhar T., Philip L., Bhallamudi S.M. Bench-scale column experiments to study the containment of Cr(VI) in confined aquifers by bio-transformation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B131:200-209.
2. VADEQ Rentokil (Virginia Wood Preserving), Henrico County, Virginia. Superfund Program Site Fact Sheet 2004, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, USA, http://www.deq.virginia.gov/waste/pdf/superfund/ren.pdf.
3. Gowd S.S., Govil P.K. Distribution of heavy metals in surface water of Ranipet industrial area in Tamil Nadu, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 136:197-207.
4. Sun J.-M., Changa S.-Y., Li R., Huang J.-C. Factors affecting co-removal of chromium through copper precipitation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 56:57-62.
5. Jeyasingh J., Philip L. Bioremediation of chromium contaminated soil: optimization of operating parameters under laboratory conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, B118:113-120.
6. Rama Krishna K., Philip L. Bioremediation of Cr(VI) in contaminated soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, B121:109-117.
7. Elangovan R., Philip L. Performance of various bioreactors for the removal of Cr(VI) and organic matter from industrial effluent. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 44:174-186.
8. Chai L., Huang S., Yang Z., Peng B., Huang Y., Chen Y. Cr (VI) remediation by indigenous bacteria in soils, contaminated by chromium-containing slag. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167:516-522.
9. Shukla O.P., Rai U.N., Dubey S. Involvement and interaction of microbial communities in the transformation and stabilization of chromium during the composting of tannery effluent treated biomass of Vallisneria spiralis L. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2198-2203.
10. Polti M.A., Garcia R.O., Amoroso M.J., Abate C.M. Bioremediation of chromium (VI) contaminated soil by Streptomyces sp. MC1. J. Basic Microbiol. 2008, 48:1-8.
11. Desjardina V., Bayarda R., Hucka R., Manceaub A., Gourdona R. Effect of microbial activity on the mobility of chromium in soils. Waste Manage. 2002, 22:195-200.
12. Douglas S.O., Fred J.B., Robert S.B., Thomas L.K. Microbial reduction of hexavalent chromium under vadose zone conditions. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:317-324.
13. Tseng J.K., Benefieldt A.R. Low temperature chromium(VI) biotransformation in soil with varying electron acceptors. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31:1831-1841.
14. Quana X., Tan H., Zhao Y., Hua Y. Detoxification of chromium slag by chromate resistant bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, B137:836-841.
15. Shieh H.J., Peralta R.C. Optimal in situ bioremediation design by hybrid Genetic Algorithm-simulated annealing. J. Water Res. Pl-ASCE 2005, 131:67-78.
16. Guha H. Bio-geochemical influence on transport of chromium in manganese sediments: experimental and modeling approaches. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2004, 70:1-36.
17. Shashidhar T., Bhallamudi S.M., Philip L. Development and validation of a model of bio-barriers for remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated aquifers using laboratory column experiments. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 145:437-452.
18. Shashidhar T., Nisha N., Philip L., Bhallamudi S.M. Design of a passive biobarrier system for chromium containment in confined aquifers. Pract. Periodical Hazard. Toxic Radioac. Waste Manage. 2007, 11:216-224.
19. Hu Z., Chan C.W., Huang G.H. Model predictive control for in situ bioremediation system. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2006, 37:514-521.
20. Bureau of Indian Standards Compendium of Indian Standards on Soil Engineering. Part I 1989, Bureau of Indian Standards.
21. American Public Health Association American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1995, American Public Health Association.
22. Bae W.C., Kang T.G., Kang I.K., Won Y.J., Jeong B.C. Reduction of hexavalent chromium by Escherichia coli ATCC 33456 in batch and continuous cultures. J. Microbiol. 2000, 38:36-39.
23. USEPA Toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) 55(61), Federal Register 1990, USEPA, Washington, DC, pp 11798-11877.
24. Ohtake H., Fujii E., Toda K. Bacterial reduction of hexavalent chromium: kinetic aspects of chromate reduction by E. Cloacae HO1. Biocatalysis 1990, 4:227-235.
25. Kohne J.M., Kohne S., Simunek J. Multi-process herbicide transport in structured soil columns: experiments and model analysis. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2006, 85:1-32.