Variable phenotypes of bicuspid aortic valve disease: Classification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Heart

Volumn 96, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 1233-1240

  Buchner, Stefan ^a   Hülsmann, Marion ^a   Poschenrieder, Florian ^a   Hamer, Okka W ^a   Fellner, Claudia ^a   Kobuch, Reinhard ^a   Feuerbach, Stefan ^a   Riegger, Günter A J ^a   Djavidani, Behrus ^a   Luchner, Andreas ^a   Debl, Kurt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA ROOT; ARTICLE; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA; AORTIC VALVE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954797125     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.186254     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Campbell M. Calcific aortic stenosis and congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Br Heart J 1968;30:606-16.
2. Roberts WC. The structure of the aortic valve in clinically isolated aortic stenosis: an autopsy study of 162 patients over 15 years of age. Circulation 1970;42:91-7.
3. Roberts WC. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 1970;26:72-83.
4. Fernandes SM, Khairy P, Sanders SP, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2211-14. (Pubitemid 46824114)
5. Lewin MB, Otto CM. The bicuspid aortic valve: adverse outcomes from infancy to old age. Circulation 2005;111:832-4.
6. Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al. Dilatation of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Clin Res Cardiol 2008;98(2):114-20.
7. Kuralay E, Demirkilic U, Ozal E, et al. Surgical approach to ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve. J Card Surg 2003;18:173-80. (Pubitemid 36470296)
8. Nash PJ, Vitvitsky E, Li J, et al. Feasibility of valve repair for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valvesean echocardiographic study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1473-9. (Pubitemid 40614551)
9. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation 2008;117:2776-84.
10. Misfeld M, Bechtel M, Sievers HH. Types of reconstructive surgery of the aortic valve. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2007;48:781-90. (Pubitemid 350284114)
11. Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1226-33. (Pubitemid 46656388)
12. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004;90:893-901. (Pubitemid 39005936)
13. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:631-6.
14. Burman ED, Keegan J, Kilner PJ. Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement, and corresponding normal values. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2008.
15. Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, et al. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology 2008;109:126-34.
16. Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al. Unicuspid aortic valve disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Rofo 2008;180:983-7.
17. Chatzimavroudis GP, Oshinski JN, Franch RH, et al. Quantification of the aortic regurgitant volume with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping: a clinical investigation of the importance of imaging slice location. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:94-101.
18. Varaprasathan GA, Araoz PA, Higgins CB, et al. Quantification of flow dynamics in congenital heart disease: applications of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Radiographics 2002;22:895-905; discussion 905-6.
19. Krombach GA, Kuhl H, Bucker A, et al. Cine MR imaging of heart valve dysfunction with segmented true fast imaging with steady state free precession. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:59-67.
20. Brandenburg RO Jr, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, et al. Accuracy of 2-dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: echocardiographicanatomic correlation in 115 patients. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1469-73.
21. Espinal M, Fuisz AR, Nanda NC, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of transesophageal echocardiography for determination of aortic valve morphology. Am Heart J 2000;139:1071-6. (Pubitemid 30390338)
22. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, et al. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2002;144:329-34. (Pubitemid 34879659)
23. Gleeson TG, Mwangi I, Horgan SJ, et al. Steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine MRI in distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:873-8.
24. Sabet HY, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, et al. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:14-26.
25. Roberts CS, Roberts WC. Dissection of the aorta associated with congenital malformation of the aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:712-16.
26. Thanassoulis G, Yip JW, Filion K, et al. Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008.
27. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1890-900.
28. Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005;111:920-5.
29. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2000;83:81-5. (Pubitemid 30307645)
30. Fernandes SM, Sanders SP, Khairy P, et al. Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1648-51. (Pubitemid 39369798)
31. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008;94:1634-8.
32. Fazel SS, Mallidi HR, Lee RS, et al. The aortopathy of bicuspid aortic valve disease has distinctive patterns and usually involves the transverse aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:901-7, 907 e1-2.
33. Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, et al. Features and predictors of ascending aortic dilatation in association with a congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:99-101.
34. Pettersson GB, Crucean AC, Savage R, et al. Toward predictable repair of regurgitant aortic valves: a systematic morphology-directed approach to bicommissural repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:40-9.
35. El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL, Glineur D, et al. Repair of bicuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2006;114:I610-16.
36. Schafers HJ, Aicher D, Langer F. Correction of leaflet prolapse in valve-preserving aortic replacement: pushing the limits? Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:S1762-4; discussion S1792-9.
37. Aicher D, Langer F, Kissinger A, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: a reasonable option? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:662-8.
38. David TE. Surgery of the aortic valve. Curr Probl Surg 1999;36:426-501.
39. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006;114:e84-231.