Gutzwiller magnetic phase diagram of the undoped t- t′ -U Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Markiewicz, R S ^a,b,c   Lorenzana, J ^b,c   Seibold, G ^d  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÀ DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA   (Italy)

^c ISC CNR   (Italy)

^d BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954796048     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014510     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. L. F. Tocchio, F. Becca, A. Parola, and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. B 78, 041101 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.041101
2. F. Becca, L. F. Tocchio, and S. Sorella, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 145, 012016 (2009). 10.1088/1742-6596/145/1/012016
3. R. S. Markiewicz, J. Lorenzana, G. Seibold, and A. Bansil, preceding paper, Phys. Rev. B 81, 014509 (2010) 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014509.
4. M. P. Gelfand, R. R. P. Singh, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 40, 10801 (1989) 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.10801
5. E. Dagotto and A. Moreo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2148 (1989) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2148
6. M. P. Gelfand, Phys. Rev. B 42, 8206 (1990) 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.8206
7. H. Schulz and T. Ziman, Europhys. Lett. 18, 355 (1992) 10.1209/0295-5075/18/4/013
8. R. R. P. Singh, Z. Weihong, C. J. Hamer, and J. Oitmaa, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7278 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.7278
9. L. Capriotti and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3173 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3173
10. O. P. Sushkov, J. Oitmaa, and Z. Weihong, Phys. Rev. B 63, 104420 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.104420
11. L. Capriotti, F. Becca, A. Parola, and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097201 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.097201
12. W. F. Brinkman and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 2, 4302 (1970). 10.1103/PhysRevB.2.4302
13. P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
14. R. Bulla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 136 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.136
15. F. Gebhard, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9452 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.9452
16. G. Seibold and J. Lorenzana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2605 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2605
17. J. Lorenzana and G. Seibold, Low Temp. Phys. 32, 320 (2006). 10.1063/1.2199431
18. G. Seibold, F. Becca, P. Rubin, and J. Lorenzana, Phys. Rev. B 69, 155113 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.155113
19. A. Di Ciolo, J. Lorenzana, M. Grilli, and G. Seibold, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085101 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.085101
20. Part of this difference is due to the fact that the RPA calculation samples all q values [Fig.] while the Gutzwiller calculation was restricted to the high-symmetry axes, Γ → (π, 0) → (π, π) → Γ.
21. R. S. Markiewicz, S. Sahrakorpi, M. Lindroos, Hsin Lin, and A. Bansil, Phys. Rev. B 72, 054519 (2005). In Fig. we introduce an effective t e f f ′ = t ′ - t ′, which controls the energy of the Van Hove singularity. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.054519
22. - is not expected to vary greatly with doping (Ref.).
23. R. Frésard and P. Wölfle, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4, 3625 (1992). 10.1088/0953-8984/4/13/022
24. C. Kusko and R. S. Markiewicz, Phys. Rev. B 65, 041102 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.041102