Disease classification: A pitfall of the ERA/EDTA registry?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2799-

  Tsakiris, Dimitrios J ^a   Simpson, Keith ^b   Stel, Vianda ^c   Wanner, Christoph ^d   Jager, Kitty J ^c  

^a G PAPANICOLAOU HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; LETTER; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TRAINING; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATION; IMMUNOLOGY; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; PARAPROTEINEMIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAIN;

HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAINS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; PARAPROTEINEMIAS; REGISTRIES; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954768178     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq290     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Ronco P. Disease classification: a pitfall of the ERA/EDTA registry? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 1022-1024
2. Tsakiris DJ, Stel VS, Finne P et al. Incidence and outcome of patients starting renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease due to multiple myeloma or light-chain deposit disease: an ERA-EDTA Registry study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 1200-1206