Fine-grained classification of named entities exploiting latent semantic kernels

CoNLL 2009 - Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 201-209

  Giuliano, Claudio ^a  

^a ITC IRST   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

FINE GRAINED; KERNEL BASED APPROACH; KERNEL FUNCTION; LATENT SEMANTICS; NAMED ENTITIES; STATE OF THE ART; TRAINING DATA; ONTOLOGY'S; SEMANTIC SPACE; WIKIPEDIA;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 77954763955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1596374.1596406     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Javier Artiles, Julio Gonzalo, and Satoshi Sekine. 2007. The semeval-2007 weps evaluation: Establishing abenchmark for the web people search task. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 64-69, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Javier Artiles, Julio Gonzalo, and Satoshi Sekine. 2009. Weps 2 evaluation campaign: overview of the web people search clustering task. In 2nd Web People Search Evaluation Workshop (WePS 2009), 18th WWW Conference, Madrid, Spain, April.
3. Thorsten Brants and Alex Franz. 2006. Web 1T 5-gram corpus version 1, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
4. Philipp Cimiano and Johanna Völker. 2005. Towards large-scale, open-domain and ontology-based named entity classification. In Proceedings of RANLP'05, pages 66- 166-172, Borovets, Bulgaria.
5. Scott C. Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, Thoms K. Landauer, George W. Furnas, and Richard A. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391-407.
6. Michael Fleischman and Eduard Hovy. 2002. Fine grained classification of named entities. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Taipei, Taiwan.
7. Aldo Gangemi, Roberto Navigli, and Paola Velardi. 2003. Axiomatizing WordNet glosses in the Onto Word Net project. In Proocedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology for the Semantic Web and Web Services at ISWC 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida.
8. Venkatesh Ganti, Arnd C. K̈onig, and Rares Vernica. 2008. Entity categorization over large document collections. In KDD '08: Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 274-282, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
9. Alfio Giozzo and Carlo Strapparava. 2005. Domain kernels for text categorization. In Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 56-63, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June.
10. Claudio Giuliano and Alfio Gliozzo. 2007. Instance based lexical entailment for ontology population. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLPCoNLL), pages 248-256.
11. Claudio Giuliano and Alfio Gliozzo. 2008. Instancebased ontology population exploiting named-entity substitution. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 265-272, Manchester, UK, August.
12. Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Claudio Giuliano, and Carlo Strapparava. 2005. Domain kernels for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 403-410, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June.
13. Zornitsa Kozareva, Sonia Vazquez, and Andres Montoyo. 2008. Domain information for fine-grained person name categorization. In 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing 2008), pages 311-321, Haifa, Israel, 17-23 February.
14. Xin Li and Dan Roth. 2005. Learning question classifiers: the role of semantic information. Natural Language Engineering, 12(3):229-249.
15. I. Dan Melamed and Philip Resnik. 2000. Tagger evaluation given hierarchical tag sets. Computers and the Humanities, pages 79-84.
16. Davide Picca, Alfio Gliozzo, and Massimiliano Ciaramita. 2007. Semantic domains and supersense tagging for domain-specific ontology learning. In David Evans, Sadaoki Furui, and Chantal Soulé-Dupuy, editors, Recherche d'Information Assistée par Ordinateur (RIAO), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, May.
17. B. Schölkopf and A. Smola. 2002. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
18. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
19. Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2008. YAGO: A large ontology from wikipedia and wordnet. Elsevier Journal of Web Semantics.
20. Partha Pratim Talukdar, Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca, Deepak Ravichandran, Rahul Bhagat, and Fernando Pereira. 2008. Weakly-supervised acquisition of labeled class instances using graph random walks. In Proceedings of the conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 25-27.
21. Hristo Tanev and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. Weakly supervised approaches for ontology population. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-2006), Trento, Italy.