Reducing intimate partner homicides: The effects of federally-funded shelter service availability in California

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 512-519

  Wells, William ^a   Ren, Ling ^a   DeLeon Granados, William ^b  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Criminology Program and Policy Consultancy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954760919     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berk R.A., Newton P.J., Berk S.F. What a difference a day makes: An empirical study of the impact of shelters for battered women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1986, 48:481-490.
2. Block C.R., Christakos A. Intimate partner homicide in Chicago over 29years. Crime and Delinquency 1995, 41:496-526.
3. Block C.R., Devitt C.O., Fugate M., Martin C., Pasold T., Fonda D., et al. The Chicago women's health risk study: Risk of serious injury or death in intimate violence: A collaborative research project 2000, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Chicago, (NCJ 184511).
4. Browne A., Williams K.R. Exploring the effect of resource availability and the likelihood of female-perpetrated homicides. Law and Society Review 1989, 23:75-94.
5. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research 1967, Rand McNally, Chicago.
6. Campbell J.C. Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2004, 19:1464-1477.
7. Cao L., Cao J., Zhao J. Estimating the effects of family structure and economic deprivation on juvenile delinquency: A panel study. Journal of Criminal Justice 2004, 32:565-576.
8. Catalano S. Intimate partner violence in the United States 2007, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
9. Criminal Justice Statistics Center Crime in urban and rural California. Outlook 1997, December, California Department of Justice, Sacramento.
10. DeLeon-Granados W., Wells W. The reliability and validity of measures of domestic violence resources as used in intimate partner homicide research. Violence Against Women 2003, 9:148-162.
11. Dighton D., Griffiths K. Web-based technology paves the way to better services for victims of crime. The Compiler 2003, 21:1-5.
12. Dugan L., Nagin D.S., Rosenfeld R. Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies 1999, 3:187-214.
13. Dugan L., Nagin D.S., Rosenfeld R. Exposure reduction or backlash? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate partner homicide, final report 2001, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
14. Dugan L., Nagin D.S., Rosenfeld R. Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law and Society Review 2003, 37:169-198.
15. Eastman B.J., Bunch S.G. Providing services to survivors of domestic violence: A comparison of rural and urban service provider perceptions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2007, 22:465-473.
16. Fox J.A. Analysis of trends in intimate murders, 1976-1996. Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends 1998, March, 6-10. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. L.A. Greenfeld, M.R. Rand, D. Craven, P.A. Klaus, C.A. Perkins, C. Ringel (Eds.).
17. Fox J.A., Zawitz M.W. Homicide trends in the United States 2007, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
18. Gallup-Black A. Twenty years of rural and urban trends in family and intimate partner homicide: Does place matter?. Homicide Studies 2005, 9:149-173.
19. Greene W. Econometric analysis 2007, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978, 46:1251-1271.
21. Hsiao C. Analysis of panel data 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York.
22. Iyengar R. Does the certainty of arrest reduce domestic violence?: Evidence from mandatory and recommended arrest laws 2007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, (NBER Working Paper No. 13186).
23. Jennings W.G., Piquero A.R. Trajectories of non-intimate partner and intimate partner homicides, 1980-1999: The importance of rurality. Journal of Criminal Justice 2008, 38:435-443.
24. Johnson H., Hotton T. Losing control: Homicide risk in estranged and intact intimate relationships. Homicide Studies 2003, 7:58-84.
25. Krishnan S.P., Hilbert J.C., McNeil K. Understanding domestic violence in multi-ethnic rural communities: A focus on collaborations among the courts, the law enforcement agencies, and the shelters 2002, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
26. Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women 2004, National Academic Press, Washington, DC. C. Kruttschnitt, B.L. McLaughlin, C.V. Petrie (Eds.).
27. Lempert R. Strategies of research design in the legal impact study: The control of plausible rival hypotheses. Law and Society Review 1966, 1:111-132.
28. Maxwell C.D., Garner J.H., Fagan J.A. The preventive effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: Research, policy, and theory. Criminology and Public Policy 2002, 2:51-80.
29. Nagin D.S., Farrington D.A. The onset and persistence of offending. Criminology 1992, 30:501-523.
30. Peterson E.S.L. Murder as self-help: Women and intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies 1999, 3:30-46.
31. Rasche C.E. Minority women and domestic violence: The unique dilemmas of battered women of color. The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers 1995, 246-261. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed. B.R. Price, N.J. Sokoloff (Eds.).
32. Rennison C.M., Welchans S. Intimate partner violence 2000, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
33. Riger S., Krieglstein M. The impact of welfare reform on men's violence against women. American Journal of Community Psychology 2000, 28:631-647.
34. Rosenfeld R. Changing relationships between men and women: A note on the decline in intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies 1997, 1:72-83.
35. Shetty S., Kaguyutan J. Immigrant victims of domestic violence: Cultural challenges and available legal protections 2002, Retrieved October 16, 2009, from http://new.vawnet.org/category/Main_Doc.php?docid=384.
36. Solomon S.E., Uchida C.D. Murder on the front range: Domestic violence-related deaths in Colorado Springs, final report 2001, 21st Century Solutions, Silver Springs, MD.
37. Sullivan C.M., Bybee D.I. Using a longitudinal data set to further our understanding of the trajectory of intimate violence over time, final report 2000, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
38. Sullivan C.M., Rumptz M.H. Adjustment and needs of African-American women who utilized a domestic violence shelter. Violence and Victims 1994, 9:275-286.
39. U.S.Census Bureau American FactFinder fact sheet: California 2000, Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/.
40. Vieraitis L.M., Williams M.R. Assessing the impact of gender inequality on female homicide victimization across U.S. cities. Violence Against Women 2002, 8:35-63.
41. Vinton L., Wilke D., Griffith A., Starks J., Heffner M., Mack J. Florida's domestic violence needs assessment for 2006-2007 2007, Florida State University, Institute for Family Violence Studies, Tallahassee.
42. Websdale N., Johnson B. Delaware rural domestic violence needs assessment 2003, (Report submitted to Wilmington: Delaware Criminal Justice Council. Violence Against Women Act Implementation Committee, State of Delaware).
43. California Penal Code § 273.5 (2009).
44. California Penal Code § 243(e) (2009).
45. Violence Against Women Act (1994).
46. Victims of Crime Act (1984).