Data conflict resolution using trust mappings

Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 219-230

  Gatterbauer, Wolfgang ^a   Suciu, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

community database; consistency; data exchange; stable model

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS; CONFLICT RESOLUTION; DATA EXCHANGE; DATA ITEMS; DATABASE CONSISTENCY; LOGIC PROGRAMS; STABLE MODEL; TRUST RELATIONSHIP; UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 77954735968     PISSN: 07308078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1807167.1807193     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. L. E. Bertossi. Consistent query answering in databases. SIGMOD Record, 35(2):68-76, 2006.
2. L. E. Bertossi and L. Bravo. The semantics of consistency and trust in peer data exchange systems. In LPAR, 2007.
3. J. Chomicki. Consistent query answering: Five easy pieces. In ICDT, 2007.
4. E. Dantsin, T. Eiter, G. Gottlob, and A. Voronkov. Complexity and expressive power of logic programming. ACM Comput. Surv., 33(3):374-425, 2001.
5. A. Fuxman, P. G. Kolaitis, R. J. Miller, and W. C. Tan. Peer data exchange. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 31(4):1454-1498, 2006.
6. M. Garey and D. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1979.
7. W. Gatterbauer, M. Balazinska, N. Khoussainova, and D. Suciu. Believe it or not: Adding belief annotations to databases. PVLDB, 2(1):1-12, 2009.
8. W. Gatterbauer and D. Suciu. Data conflict resolution using trust mappings. Technical report, UW-CSE-09-11-01, Nov. 2009. http://db.cs.washington. edu/beliefDB/.
9. T. J. Green, G. Karvounarakis, Z. G. Ives, and V. Tannen. Update exchange with mappings and provenance. In VLDB, 2007.
10. T. Imielinski and W. L. Jr. Incomplete information in relational databases. J. ACM, 31(4):761-791, 1984.
11. L. Kot and C. Koch. Cooperative update exchange in the Youtopia system. PVLDB, 2(1):193-204, 2009.
12. N. Leone, G. Pfeifer, W. Faber, T. Eiter, G. Gottlob, S. Perri, and F. Scarcello. The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning. ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 7(3):499-562, 2006.
13. V. W. Marek and M. Truszczynski. Autoepistemic logic. J. ACM, 38(3):588-619, 1991.
14. F. Naumann and M. Häussler. Declarative data merging with conflict resolution. In IQ, 2002.
15. G. L. Possehl. The Indus Age: The Writing System. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1996.
16. Y. Qi, K. S. Candan, and M. L. Sapino. FICSR: Feedback-based inconsistency resolution and query processing on misaligned data sources. In SIGMOD, 2007.
17. R. P. N. Rao, N. Yadav, M. N. Vahia, H. Joglekar, R. Adhikari, and I. Mahadevan. Entropic evidence for linguistic structure in the Indus script. Science, 324(5931):1165, May 2009.
18. R. E. Tarjan. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput., 1(2):146-160, 1972.
19. N. E. Taylor and Z. G. Ives. Reconciling while tolerating disagreement in collaborative data sharing. In SIGMOD, 2006.