Developing next generation ADLs through MDE techniques

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 85-94

  Di Ruscio, Davide ^a   Malavolta, Ivano ^a   Muccini, Henry ^a   Pelliccione, Patrizio ^a   Pierantonio, Alfonso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

ADL; metamodeling; model driven; modeling; software architecture

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS; ARCHITECTURE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; DESIGN DECISIONS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DOMAIN SPECIFICITY; FINE TUNING; METAMODELING; MODEL-DRIVEN; MODEL-DRIVEN TECHNIQUES; MODELING SOFTWARES; MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; SEMANTIC EXTENSIONS; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; LINGUISTICS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77954735678     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1806799.1806816     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. J. H. Bae and H. S. Chae. UMLSlicer: A tool for modularizing the UML metamodel using slicing. In CIT 2008., 2008.
2. J. Bézivin, S. Bouzitouna, M. Del Fabro, M. P. Gervais, F. Jouault, D. Kolovos, I. Kurtev, and R. F. Paige. A canonical scheme for model composition. In Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications, 2006.
3. J. Bézivin, F. Jouault, P. Rosenthal, and P. Valduriez. Modeling in the large and modeling in the small. In LNCS, Vol. 3599, 2005.
4. A. Cicchetti, D. Di Ruscio, R. Eramo, and A. Pierantonio. Automating co-evolution in model-driven engineering. In EDOC 2008, 2008.
5. A. Cicchetti, D. Di Ruscio, and A. Pierantonio. Managing dependent changes in coupled evolution. In ICMT'09, 2009.
6. K. Czarnecki and S. Helsen. Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Syst. J., 45(3), 2006.
7. E. M. Dashofy, A. v. d. Hoek, and R. N. Taylor. A comprehensive approach for the development of modular software architecture description languages. TOSEM, 14(2), 2005.
8. E. M. Dashofy, A. van der Hoek, and R. N. Taylor. A highly-extensible, xml-based architecture description language. In Proceedings of WICSA '01, 2001.
9. D. Di Ruscio, H. Muccini, A. Pierantonio, and P. Pelliccione. Towards weaving software architecture models. In MBD-MOMPES '06, 2006.
10. J. Dingel, Z. Diskin, and A. Zito. Understanding and improving UML package merge. SoSyM, 7(4), 2008.
11. G. Edwards and N. Medvidovic. A methodology and framework for creating domain-specific development infrastructures. In ASE'08, 2008.
12. P. Feiler, B. Lewis, and S. Vestal. The SAE Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL) standard. In RTAS, 2003.
13. G. Ferreira, C. M. Rubira, and R. de Lemos. Explicit Representation of Exception Handling in the Development of Dependable Componet-based Shystems. In HASE01, 2001.
14. D. Garlan, R. Monroe, and D. Wile. Acme: an architecture description interchange language. In CASCON'97, 1997.
15. D. Garlan and M. Shaw. An Introduction to Software Architecture. In Advances in Soft. Eng. and Know. Eng., volume 2, 1994.
16. ISO. Fourth working draft of Systems and Software Engineering - Architectural Description (ISO/IECWD4 42010). Working doc.: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 N 000, 2009.
17. C. Jeanneret, R. France, and B. Baudry. A reference process for model composition. In AOM '08, 2008.
18. S. John. Architecture Description Markup Language (ADML): Creating an Open Market for IT Architecture Tools. Technical report, The Open Group, 2008.
19. F. Jouault and I. Kurtev. Transforming Models with ATL. In Proceedings of the MTP, Workshop at MoDELS 2005, 2006.
20. P. Kruchten, P. Lago, and H. van Vliet. Building up and reasoning about architectural knowledge. QoSA, 2006.
21. A. Lédeczi, G. Nordstrom, G. Karsai, P. Völgyesi, and M. Maróti. On metamodel composition. In CCA '01, 2001.
22. J. Magee and J. Kramer. Dynamic structure in software architectures. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 21(6), 1996.
23. I. Malavolta, H. Muccini, P. Pelliccione, and D. A. Tamburri. Providing architectural languages and tools interoperability through model transformation technologies. IEEE TSE, 36(1), 2010.
24. N. Medvidovic, E. M. Dashofy, and R. N. Taylor. Moving architectural description from under the technology lamppost. Infor. and Software Technology, 49, 2007.
25. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. IEEE TSE, 26(1), 2000.
26. Object Management Group. OMG/Unified Modelling Language(UML) V2.0, 2004.
27. P. Pelliccione, P. Inverardi, and H. Muccini. CHARMY: A framework for designing and verifying architectural specifications. IEEE TSE, 35(3), 2009.
28. D. E. Perry and A. L. Wolf. Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture. In SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, volume 17, 1992.
29. M. Pinto, L. Fuentes, and J. M. Troya. DAOP-ADL: an architecture description language for dynamic component and aspect-based development. In GPCE'03, 2003.
30. R. A. Pottinger and P. A. Bernstein. Merging models based on given correspondences. In VLDB '2003, 2003.
31. J. Sanchez Cuadrado and J. G. Molina. A model-based approach to families of embedded domain-specific languages. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 35(6), 2009.
32. M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall, 1996.
33. T. Reiter, E. Kapsammer, W. Retschitzegger, W. Schwinger. Model integration through mega operations. In MDWE, 2005.
34. R. N. Taylor, N. Medvidovic, and E. M. Dashofy. Software Architecture: Foundations, Theory, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, January 2009.