Phenomenology of ESR in heavy-fermion systems: Fermi-liquid and non-Fermi-liquid regimes

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 23, 2009, Pages

  Wölfle, Peter ^a   Abrahams, Elihu ^b  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954725921     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.235112     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J. Sichelschmidt, V. A. Ivanshin, J. Ferstl, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 156401 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.156401
2. C. Krellner, T. Forster, H. Jeevan, C. Geibel, and J. Sichelschmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 066401 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.066401
3. U. Schaufuß, V. Kataev, A. A. Zvyagin, B. Büchner, J. Sichelschmidt, J. Wykhoff, C. Krellner, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 076405 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.076405
4. J. G. S. Duque, E. M. Bittar, C. Adriano, C. Giles, L. M. Holanda, R. Lora-Serrano, P. G. Pagliuoso, C. Rettori, C. A. Pérez, Rongwei Hu, C. Petrovic, S. Maquilon, Z. Fisk, D. L. Huber, and S. B. Oseroff, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035122 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.035122
5. P. Gegenwart, J. Custers, Y. Tokiwa, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 076402 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.076402
6. E. Abrahams and P. Wölfle, Phys. Rev. B 78, 104423 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.104423
7. P. Schlottmann, Phys. Rev. B 79, 045104 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79. 045104
8. S.-K. Yip, Phys. Rev. B 38, 8785 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.8785
9. G. Feher and A. F. Kip, Phys. Rev. 98, 337 (1955). 10.1103/PhysRev.98.337
10. E. Abrahams (unpublished).
11. e.g., D. L. Huber, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 322203 (2009). In this work, the g -factor anisotropy for the localized spin model was considered. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/32/322203
12. + ion, which is treated as a pseudospin 1/2 in our model. This is justified since the splitting to the next higher multiplet is much larger (≈120 K ) that the temperature of the experiments. Therefore the issue of the (pseudo)spin conservation or not in the Anderson lattice model does not arise.
13. The term proportional to m / m * was inadvertently misevaluated in Eq. (20) of AW.
14. In the familiar Fermi-liquid notation, F 0 a = - 2 N 0 Ũ.
15. J. Sichelschmidt, J. Wykhoff, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, J. Ferstl, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 116204 (2007). 10.1088/0953-8984/19/11/116204
16. See, for example, Fig. 1 of Ref..
17. S. Paschen, T. Lühmann, S. Wirth, P. Gegenwart, O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, F. Steglich, P. Coleman, and Q. Si, Nature (London) 413, 804 (2004).
18. P. Gegenwart, T. Westerkamp, C. Krellner, Y. Tokiwa, S. Paschen, C. Geibel, F. Steglich, E. Abrahams, and Q. Si, Science 315, 969 (2007). 10.1126/science.1136020
19. O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, S. Mederle, C. Langhammer, F. M. Grosche, P. Gegenwart, M. Lang, G. Sparn, and F. Steglich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 626 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.626
20. P. Gegenwart, Y. Tokiwa, T. Westerkamp, F. Weickert, J. Custers, J. Ferstl, C. Krellner, C. Geibel, P. Kerschl, K.-H. Müller, and F. Steglich, New J. Phys. 8, 171 (2006). 10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/171
21. P. Gegenwart, Y. Tokiwa, J. Custers, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 155 (2006).
22. O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Physica B: Condensed Matter 284-288, 1507 (2000). 10.1016/S0921-4526(99)02716-7
23. C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1996