Recovering uncertain mappings through structural validation and aggregation with the MoTo system

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1428-1432

  Esposito, Floriana ^a   Fanizzi, Nicola ^a   D'Amato, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDIVIDUAL PREDICTION; LINGUISTIC QUANTIFIERS; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; META-LEARNER; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MAPPING; ONTOLOGY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77954720390     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1774088.1774390     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. D. Aumueller, H. Do, S. Massmann, and E. Rahm. Schema and ontology matching with coma++. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 906-908, 2005.
2. A. Doan, P. Domingos, and A. Y. Halevy. Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine-learning approach. In SIGMOD Conf., pages 509-520, 2001.
3. K. Eckert, C. Meilicke, and H. Stuckenschmidt. Improving ontology matching using meta-level learning. In Proc. of the Europ. Semantic Web Conf., ESWC2008, volume 5444 of LNCS. Springer, 2009.
4. M. Ehrig, S. Staab, and Y. Sure. Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with apfel. In Y. Gil and et al., editors, Proc. of the Int. Semantic Web Conf., volume 3729 of LNCS, pages 186-200. Springer, 2005.
5. J. Euzenat and et al. State of the art on ontology alignment. Deliv. D2.2.3, Knowledge Web NoE, 2004.
6. J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko. Ontology matching. Springer, 2007.
7. M. Grabisch, S. Orlovski, and R. Yager. Fuzzy aggregation of numerical preferences. Fuzzy sets in decision analysis, operations research and statistics, pages 31-68, 1999.
8. B. Hariri, H. Abolhassani, and A. Khodaei. A new structural similarity measure for ontology alignment. In H. Arabnia, editor, Proc. of SWWS 2006, pages 36-42. CSREA Press, 2006.
9. Q. Ji, P. Haase, and G. Qi. Combination of similarity measures in ontology matching using the OWA operator. In L. Magdalena and et al., editors, Proc. of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, IPMU08, pages 243-250, 2008.
10. T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997.
11. P. Resnik. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:95-130, 1999.
12. P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics, IV:146-171, 2005.
13. K. Tu and Y. Yu. CMC: Combining multiple schema-matching strategies based on credibility prediction. In L. Zhou and et al., editors, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, DASFAA2005, volume 3453 of LNCS, pages 888-893. Springer, 2005.
14. D. Wolpert. Stacked generalization. Neural networks, 5:241-259, 1992.